Question for SK

[blackpowder]

And really at the end of the day, you Upper Canada Loyalists see a one way street. Us buying from you.

[goalieguy847]

This is excellent. The small nuclear reactor bit.. not the coal thing. Burning coal is dumb. Its bad for everyone except for the company selling it.

my grandparents burnt coal in the house we live in now. They went away from it in the 40s because it was, and i quote, " dirty as shit".

Nuclear.
natural gas.

Solar. Hydro. Etc etc. So many better sources.
but.. whatever to make a buck i suppose.

Big question is.. will it make electricity cheaper?

( it wont)

Just lIke the genesis plant or a local urea plant wont bring down fertilizer price.
so.. under the guise of jobs.
may as well burn coal like my grandparents did.... 100 yrs ago.

Real smart.
i get.. i do. Because of the situation we are in..
westmoreland coal. Same.company thats filed for bankruptcy 3 times in the .u.s.a and has cut benefits of almost 400 million $$ to retired workers?
same one thats been lobbying the alberta govt on the definition of " open pit " mining?



Same one?

Yeah. What a Huge win for sask..
Yayyyyy!!!!!!!!!¡!!!!!!!!!!

Get bent.

honestly.

[chuckChuck]

Coal is the past, just like Moe and Smith who want to protect the old jobs and economy at the expense of diversifying to future jobs and prosperity.

Moe now knows nuclear is a long way off and very expensive. So lets just keep aging coal plants.

Alberta built lots of gas plants and renewables a way ahead of schedule. They now have several new gas plants that cover needs and are at least 50% cleaner when it comes to emmissions.

We are still going to need fossil fuels for some time. Oil will be available for petro chemicals and other uses. Gas is a decent option for the interim because it allows for flexibilty with more renewables.

Build enough renewables at a much lower cost. Back them up with hydro and gas and strong connections to other provinces and you can reduce emissions and keep costs down.

But Alberta and Saskatchewan are laggards and using all kinds of excuses that it can't be done.

[cropgrower]

are you simple minded enough to think your plan will work when everybody is also charging their EV s cc ? their will need to be a huge increase in energy produced

[shtferbrains]

Think these people are going home to charge their EV's.

And solar drop off at 5pm.

[furrowtickler]

And really at the end of the day, you Upper Canada Loyalists see a one way street. Us buying from you.

That’s a huge part of this , they want to control the energy money .
they detest Alberta and Sask because of it . You can see it in every one of their posts clear as day

[Hamloc]

The ENERGY Corridor that Carney talks about in Canada.... Should mean clean Hydro from Manitoba,B.C and Quebec. Here in Sask we need more Electricity and Manitoba has LOTS.
Instead of investing BILLIONS on small nuclear plants that wont be here for 30 years get talking to Manitoba. But no these idiots want to go back to the 1800's and extend coal

You need to do more research, Quebec, B.C. and Manitoba are to the point, especially in B.C. where hydro production and electricity demand are almost equal. There is little excess left for export. This belief that there is excess hydro production that could be exported across Canada is a load of B.S.
In fact read this: vancouversun.com/opinion/op-ed/opinion-just-as-b-c-has-less-water-to-make-electricity-we-have-more-demand.
From article, referring to the snowpack “Once again that means less water to generate electricity and another year where B.C. Hydro is projecting to be a net importer of power.”
Rastafarian you are living in a green dream!