SARM is an embrassment with CO2 resolution!

[fjlip]

Answer CC...How does the 97% natural C02 NOT drive global climate, but 3% man made does?

Can you TELL them apart? They smell different? Different color? Heavier?

[chuckChuck]

So Flipper you don't seem understand that CO2 levels have risen from 280 ppm in 1750 to over 420ppm and the majority of that increase has come from burning fossil fuels?

"Atmospheric carbon dioxide is now 50 percent higher than it was before the Industrial Revolution."

The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (blue line) has increased along with human emissions (gray line) since the start of the Industrial Revolution in 1750. Emissions rose slowly to about 5 gigatons—one gigaton is a billion metric tons—per year in the mid-20^th century before skyrocketing to more than 35 billion tons per year by the end of the century. NOAA Climate.gov graph, adapted from original by Dr. Howard Diamond (NOAA ARL). Atmospheric CO₂ data from NOAA ([url]https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html[/url]) and ETHZ ([url]https://iac.ethz.ch/[/url]). CO₂ emissions data from Our World in Data ([url]https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions#how-have-global-co2-emissions-changed-over-time[/url]) and the Global Carbon Project ([url]https://www.globalcarbonproject.org/).[/url]

[Hamloc]

Chuck2, interesting article on [url]www.science.smith.edu[/url] : “The effects of the little Ice Age(c. 1300-1850).”

A two degree Celsius drop in temperature. Your comparing levels of C02 to 1750. Are you also comparing today’s temperature to 1750? Obviously higher now after exiting the little Ice Age.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck2, interesting article on [url]www.science.smith.edu[/url] : “The effects of the little Ice Age(c. 1300-1850).”

A two degree Celsius drop in temperature. Your comparing levels of C02 to 1750. Are you also comparing today’s temperature to 1750? Obviously higher now after exiting the little Ice Age.

And that is why Micheal Mann has to defend the hockey Schtick at all costs. To erase the little ice age, and the Medieval warm period before that. Otherwise, comparing todays temperatures to the depth of the little ice age would look a lot like cherry picking.

[shtferbrains]

Your graph look much like this one but this one gets into much more detail.
I don't like to post anything to complicated as you don't seem to interested in actual data but it shouldn't be to hard to figure out.
Now what are we going to do about it?
If we pay higher carbon tax will it start dropping in a few years like our environment minister promised?

[furrowtickler]

That chart is a hard reality check as carbon tax increases 23% shortly again

[sumdumguy]

Would like to bury the Carbon Scam with the Liberals and NDP. ????

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Would like to bury the Carbon Scam with the Liberals and NDP. ????

I don't want to it buried. I want criminal investigation to see how many liberal friends and family have been on the take.
If you thought the arrive scam fraud was bad, wait until we dig into this one..

[fjlip]

"So Flipper you don't seem understand that CO2 levels have risen from 280 ppm in 1750 to over 420ppm and the majority of that increase has come from burning fossil fuels?"

Still amounts to SFA of the air....Not dangerous, NOT pollution, and what about the other 96%?????

[chuckChuck]

Sure Flipper! You and BL and the other flat earthers have no credibility and obviously don't understand the basics of climate change science! You can lead em to water but you can't make em drink. Where is BL by the way?