SARM is an embrassment with CO2 resolution!

[fjlip]

Answer CC...How does the 97% natural C02 NOT drive global climate, but 3% man made does?

Can you TELL them apart? They smell different? Different color? Heavier?

[chuckChuck]

So Flipper you don't seem understand that CO2 levels have risen from 280 ppm in 1750 to over 420ppm and the majority of that increase has come from burning fossil fuels?

"Atmospheric carbon dioxide is now 50 percent higher than it was before the Industrial Revolution."

The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (blue line) has increased along with human emissions (gray line) since the start of the Industrial Revolution in 1750. Emissions rose slowly to about 5 gigatons—one gigaton is a billion metric tons—per year in the mid-20^th century before skyrocketing to more than 35 billion tons per year by the end of the century. NOAA Climate.gov graph, adapted from original by Dr. Howard Diamond (NOAA ARL). Atmospheric CO₂ data from NOAA ([url]https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html[/url]) and ETHZ ([url]https://iac.ethz.ch/[/url]). CO₂ emissions data from Our World in Data ([url]https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions#how-have-global-co2-emissions-changed-over-time[/url]) and the Global Carbon Project ([url]https://www.globalcarbonproject.org/).[/url]

[Hamloc]

Chuck2, interesting article on [url]www.science.smith.edu[/url] : “The effects of the little Ice Age(c. 1300-1850).”

A two degree Celsius drop in temperature. Your comparing levels of C02 to 1750. Are you also comparing today’s temperature to 1750? Obviously higher now after exiting the little Ice Age.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck2, interesting article on [url]www.science.smith.edu[/url] : “The effects of the little Ice Age(c. 1300-1850).”

A two degree Celsius drop in temperature. Your comparing levels of C02 to 1750. Are you also comparing today’s temperature to 1750? Obviously higher now after exiting the little Ice Age.

And that is why Micheal Mann has to defend the hockey Schtick at all costs. To erase the little ice age, and the Medieval warm period before that. Otherwise, comparing todays temperatures to the depth of the little ice age would look a lot like cherry picking.

[shtferbrains]

Your graph look much like this one but this one gets into much more detail.
I don't like to post anything to complicated as you don't seem to interested in actual data but it shouldn't be to hard to figure out.
Now what are we going to do about it?
If we pay higher carbon tax will it start dropping in a few years like our environment minister promised?

[furrowtickler]

That chart is a hard reality check as carbon tax increases 23% shortly again

[sumdumguy]

Would like to bury the Carbon Scam with the Liberals and NDP. ????

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Would like to bury the Carbon Scam with the Liberals and NDP. ????

I don't want to it buried. I want criminal investigation to see how many liberal friends and family have been on the take.
If you thought the arrive scam fraud was bad, wait until we dig into this one..

[fjlip]

"So Flipper you don't seem understand that CO2 levels have risen from 280 ppm in 1750 to over 420ppm and the majority of that increase has come from burning fossil fuels?"

Still amounts to SFA of the air....Not dangerous, NOT pollution, and what about the other 96%?????

[chuckChuck]

Sure Flipper! You and BL and the other flat earthers have no credibility and obviously don't understand the basics of climate change science! You can lead em to water but you can't make em drink. Where is BL by the way?

[chuckChuck]

[url]https://climatewest.ca/publications/a-snapshot-of-the-changing-prairie-climate/[/url]

The Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative (PARC), the Prairie
Climate Centre (PCC), and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)

Here is a list of the risks and opportunities for prairie climate change from 3 research organizations from their Executive Summary

And a lot of the risks we are already experiencing.


Executive Summary
The Canadian Prairies is a hotspot for climate change—not just
within Canada, but across the world.
The region is projected to warm much faster than the global average.
Risks to ecosystems, communities, and economies will be substantial.
The Prairies are projected to continue warming even if large-scale,
international emission reduction efforts are made today.
Along with global mitigation efforts, local adaptation to climate change
will be essential for future prosperity in the Prairies.

Forest fire
1. Hotter, drier conditions;
increased evaporation creates
drier fuel
2. Longer fire season
3. More lightning strikes igniting
more fires

Drought and flood
1. Increased frequency
and intensity of heavy
rain events
2. Decrease in summer rainfall,
increase in drought
3. Increase in risk of
flash flooding

Extreme weather
1. Hotter summers
conducive to warm-season
extreme weather events
2. Milder winters, more
rain-on-snow events
3. Weather whiplash events
becoming more frequent

Agriculture
1. Favourable conditions for
pests and disease, both new
and established
2. More heat stress and variable
water supply
3. Longer growing season

Ecosystems and wildlife
1. Vegetation zones and
ecosystem shifting northward
2. Loss of alpine habitat
3. New invasive species
and pests

Health
1. Extreme heat increasing
heat-related stresses
2. More wildfire smoke,
more respiratory problems
3. New and growing
insect-borne disease

Transportation and
infrastructure
1. Unstable permafrost
2. Potholes and cracks
3. Road and bridge washouts

Tourism and recreation
1. Travel restrictions
from forest fires
2. Poorer quality of snow
and ice due to warmer
winters
3. Reduced winter tourism
season

Urban and rural
communities
1. Impacts on water availability
2. Damage to infrastructure
3. Impacts on community health

[fjlip]

I guess we are PHUCKED, carbon tax not working, maybe by 2060, at this rate we are TOAST!

You never answered, is this due to the 3.225% of C02?

Or the 96.775%?

[chuckChuck]

Are you going to ignore all the extreme weather records set in the past few years and the record forest fire season along with a record smashing hottest planetary year on record in 2023?

[cropgrower]

Yes we wont forget that their was idiots starting fires , and idiots telling us it was climate change

[chuckChuck]

So it was only arson that contributed to the record number and area by a wide margin of forest fires in 2023!

It wouldn't have anything to do with a hot and dry spring and summer?

Nobody takes the arson is the only cause seriously Crop! Thats just more crap!