• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll suggests narrow race between NDP, Sask. Party in general election

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Its long past time to wake up to the lies

    Comment


      #22
      Always two truths and a lie. At best.
      Public transportation, you bet.
      But what do the evil rail monopolies have to do with it? High speed would need new, dedicated track anyway.

      Comment


        #23
        Furthermore.
        New infrastructure like high speed rail needs lots of money to build.
        Calgary Edmonton talked about for decades. It takes a long commitment. Especially here.
        Next, pay for it.
        Not sure if China charging high fees for public transportation, charging high taxes on mostly poor public.
        Or relying on a robust economy to pay for it??
        No new resource development, no new industries yet, no new rail. Make sense?
        We wasted money in the 70s and 80s here, but we paved every bloody road. Every county councilor had right to his door.
        It's the economy and it's sales that buys railroads or anything else public. The lies have to get ever bigger I guess.

        Comment


          #24
          All sounds great in theory but truth is nowadays in the areas that really need the public transit most people won't get on a bus or subway as there are too many incidence with street people and getting caught in gang violence.

          The risk doesn't justify the reward.

          Comment


            #25
            Shake my head at the asinine comments coming out of the mouths of the federal environment minister or Charlie Angus. Especially angus as he represents a riding which benefits from roads and resources. Guilbert is an eco terrorist so he’s radicalized and I am quite frankly surprised he’s gone this long without saying something dumb.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
              Shake my head at the asinine comments coming out of the mouths of the federal environment minister or Charlie Angus. Especially angus as he represents a riding which benefits from roads and resources. Guilbert is an eco terrorist so he’s radicalized and I am quite frankly surprised he’s gone this long without saying something dumb.
              Guilbert has said/done stupid things before this while in office.
              Seems to me, people with level heads and non-biased opinions would be very beneficial in a political/cabinet position. But then again, would we have much of a cabinet?

              Comment


                #27
                Angry Moe sent a bill of over 100 grand to the NDP for them to get information released on conflict of interest issues.while Sask party has no problem buying ads with Brandt industry and oil company donations.At the beginning when the conservatives and liberal parties joined together to create the sask party cause the crooked Devine government ruined the conservatives they were very good.Now Moe and Devine governments have a lot in common.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by newguy View Post
                  Angry Moe sent a bill of over 100 grand to the NDP for them to get information released on conflict of interest issues.while Sask party has no problem buying ads with Brandt industry and oil company donations.At the beginning when the conservatives and liberal parties joined together to create the sask party cause the crooked Devine government ruined the conservatives they were very good.Now Moe and Devine governments have a lot in common.
                  Appears to be that way but does is warrant electing the ndp back in? We’re caught between a rock and a hard place. Be nice if we had an alternative that didn’t stink of the past and communism.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post

                    Appears to be that way but does is warrant electing the ndp back in? We’re caught between a rock and a hard place. Be nice if we had an alternative that didn’t stink of the past and communism.
                    Exactly. Perhaps 10 new candidates will help bring a better attitude.

                    I think there needs to be a sharper focus on the economy healthcare and education. Maybe skip the multi billion dollar investment in irrigation at this time.

                    A new NDP government would be mostly newbies in addition to the existing uninspiring candidates. Definitely a recipe for disaster.
                    Last edited by LEP; Feb 16, 2024, 22:38.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post

                      Appears to be that way but does is warrant electing the ndp back in? We’re caught between a rock and a hard place. Be nice if we had an alternative that didn’t stink of the past and communism.
                      NDP party has changed in Sask.would have never thought I would vote that way but if Sask does not get a political correction I am afraid when Moe forms a sask revenue of its own he will put massive farm corporation and capital gains tax on farmers thinking he will keep their vote anyway.Education and health care need some attention in sask for a few years before another sask party government comes back in with a fresh new slate of people To run the province.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...