Supply management was an answer to a problem at the time but ended up creating other problems as big as the original problem. Quota values are crazy and we now have to find so way to unwind ourselves from this wreck. From my understanding many supply management people have mortgages to the eyeballs to buy quota. Create a plan to extract Canada from this mess. As almost all other countries with supply management have ended their programs it is obvious that this is the direction that Canada should move too. If parliament is willing to unanimously vote support to supply management at the cost of other ag industries, which they just did, they crossed a line that can and will make things worse for grain, oilseed and cattle producers that want to sell around the world. It is a sad state we are in .
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How a few rich dairy farmers....
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
The values have been pushed so far past anything reasonable that buyouts would irresponsible and frankly impossible. Also the quota holders want it both ways they want to keep getting issued essentially free quota in the form of increases and then have a safety net at the insane levels quota is currently trading at.
As an example Saskatchewan broiler quota trades around $170 a bird. This allows you to produce 11.5 KG’s of chicken per year. A good return is .70 cents per KG after chick and feed. So think about this for a minute, that is a 4.7% return on your investment. This does NOT include insurance, utilities, labour, facility, catching, repairs, vet etc. Give these numbers a fair value and the return is negative. People paying this much for an asset should not be bailed out in anyway. It’s like yacht owner meets equestrian rider and collects rare Pokémon cards.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by 13stripe View Post
It was like any other investment, I have yet to be made "whole" on my investments that didn't turn out. The fact that it was an investment that was at the whim of trade negotiations made it risky. The closest would be the crow payout which was gone in the first year with higher freight.
When you make a deal with a government you have to expect that at any time it will be retracted. Governments change and priorities change. Agriinvest nad agristability will now have "climate change" goals to follow if you want to get any money. I am sure they will happily take the premiums but when its time to payout well you know they'll use a microscope to find a reason not to.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
U raise good points and I'm certainly no expert. Although I think the Crow and CWB on paper are not the same as quota. More myth than tangible.
If those two any indication.
Dismantling has as yet little to no support anywhere.
It was SM that constantly supported no change for grain in Ottawa.
In short, 80 years of stupidity in grain.
At least the two processors would secretly be on board.
Dairy will not happen overnight.
Possibly generations due to deep political power.
They have time to fund their own buyout package. That time will be dithered as well.
Any package will appear cheap to the industry when looking back.
I say whatever it takes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackpowder View PostU raise good points and I'm certainly no expert. Although I think the Crow and CWB on paper are not the same as quota. More myth than tangible.
If those two any indication.
Dismantling has as yet little to no support anywhere.
It was SM that constantly supported no change for grain in Ottawa.
In short, 80 years of stupidity in grain.
At least the two processors would secretly be on board.
Dairy will not happen overnight.
Possibly generations due to deep political power.
They have time to fund their own buyout package. That time will be dithered as well.
Any package will appear cheap to the industry when looking back.
I say whatever it takes.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
The biggest issue is the guarantee is too high on the supply managed items in Canada. It is based on the costs of a very inefficent, small operation using outdated equipment and technology. And then the price is set to guarantee those guys a profit, while everyone else makes out like bandits and hence over pays for quota.
That price set for supply managed items needs to be done with more of an average sized operation and then profits to producers and costs to consumers would be more realistic.
I think supply managed items and prices in Canada is a good thing (and I am only a grain farmer) but right now it is too good of a thing.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by poorboy View PostThe biggest issue is the guarantee is too high on the supply managed items in Canada. It is based on the costs of a very inefficent, small operation using outdated equipment and technology. And then the price is set to guarantee those guys a profit, while everyone else makes out like bandits and hence over pays for quota.
That price set for supply managed items needs to be done with more of an average sized operation and then profits to producers and costs to consumers would be more realistic.
I think supply managed items and prices in Canada is a good thing (and I am only a grain farmer) but right now it is too good of a thing.Last edited by dirt farmer; Jul 10, 2025, 13:29.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment