• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Confused?!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Confused?!

    On CBC Tamara Lich, convoy organizer charged with counselling to commit mischief. Chris Barber charged with the same. If we go back to Dml’s post about the EMA, he kept talking about terrorism related reasons for the implementation being necessary. Therefore I must be missing something. Is there a new charge for terrorism called mischief?! Or does Justin Trudeau now consider acts of terrorism mischief?! Can all you great defenders of the EMA and Justin Trudeau please clear this up for me!!!

    #2
    Yes confused is the right word for many of the convoy supporters and organizers.

    In due time the courts will make clear the case against all the organizers and define what mischief in this case is. There will likely also be other charges laid against protestors and organizers.

    When Tamara had her bail hearing her husband Dwayne Lich seem to not know which laws applied in Canada or the US.

    "He also questioned whether the Emergencies Act — which was debated Saturday in the House of Commons — was implemented legally, at times confusing the numbered amendments found in the U.S. Constitution with Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    "Honestly? I thought it was a peaceful protest and based on my first amendment, I thought that was part of our rights," he told the court.

    "What do you mean, first amendment? What's that?" Judge Julie Bourgeois asked him.


    "I don't know. I don't know politics. I don't know," he said. "I wasn't supportive of the blockade or the whatever, but I didn't realize that it was criminal to do what they were doing. I thought it was part of our freedoms to be able to do stuff like that."

    No bail decision yet for Tamara Lich, convoy protest organizer
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/tamara-lich-bail-hearing-february-19-1.6358307

    Comment


      #3
      Mischief sounds like egging a house at Halloween.
      JT and the liberals are all idiots...
      Proof is right here on this site..lol...

      Comment


        #4
        Why won't they let her out on bail?

        She might get interviews that keep the heat on.
        Bury her for a while and hope it blows over?

        What harm can she do Chuck?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Yes confused is the right word for many of the convoy supporters and organizers.

          In due time the courts will make clear the case against all the organizers and define what mischief in this case is. There will likely also be other charges laid against protestors and organizers.

          When Tamara had her bail hearing her husband Dwayne Lich seem to not know which laws applied in Canada or the US.

          "He also questioned whether the Emergencies Act — which was debated Saturday in the House of Commons — was implemented legally, at times confusing the numbered amendments found in the U.S. Constitution with Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

          "Honestly? I thought it was a peaceful protest and based on my first amendment, I thought that was part of our rights," he told the court.

          "What do you mean, first amendment? What's that?" Judge Julie Bourgeois asked him.


          "I don't know. I don't know politics. I don't know," he said. "I wasn't supportive of the blockade or the whatever, but I didn't realize that it was criminal to do what they were doing. I thought it was part of our freedoms to be able to do stuff like that."

          No bail decision yet for Tamara Lich, convoy protest organizer
          https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/tamara-lich-bail-hearing-february-19-1.6358307
          Just curious Chuck2 how exactly does that address my question? The justification for the implementation was suspected terrorist activity or was it insurrection or was it sedition or was it illegally obtained donor information or was it all fabrication?!

          Comment


            #6
            hmmm...

            Definition of mischief

            1: a specific injury or damage attributed to a particular agent
            the polished floor … often causes mischiefs—bruises, sprains, dislocations
            — Herbert Spencer

            2: a cause or source of harm, evil, or irritation
            especially : a person who causes mischief
            He's a real mischief to his family.


            3a: action that annoys or irritates
            Halloween mischiefs

            b: the quality or state of being mischievous : MISCHIEVOUSNESS
            had mischief in his eyes

            warning! NEVER annoy or irritate a Lieberal!

            Comment


              #7
              Or then there is the legal definition of mischief as writtern in section 430 of the criminal code of Canada

              Mischief

              430 (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully

              (a) destroys or damages property;

              (b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;

              (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or

              (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.

              Comment


                #8
                Mischief is a catch all charge in these circumstances. Yes what these folks were doing could be deemed mischief but apart from that there isn’t a lot more than that. The gravity is the judges decision as to how harsh the punishment is. Right now Ottawa police are cracking down on businesses who served the convoy people and not letting people film them. Tempers and moods are stretched and owly. Authorities are like the taliban going door to door shooting people who cooperated with the allies. Tying up loose ends so to speak. Argue about mischief and other bs but we are in a police state now. Any of you for the liberals or ndp and for the crackdowns it is only a matter of time before they come for you too. Get your heads out of the sand.

                Comment


                  #9
                  DML cleared it up.

                  Now the question is what happened to all the law and order conservatives? Have they gone soft on crime?.

                  In the end not one Conservative premier or leader was willing to say the occupation and border blockades were legal or justified. They all said go home. Since many didn't want to go home what options are left? None except the police forcing them out and arresting the organizers and those who wouldn't cooperate.

                  Spin it any way you want because the vast majority of Canadians were not in favour of the illegal blockades or occupation.
                  Last edited by chuckChuck; Feb 20, 2022, 16:08.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    https://rumble.com/embed/vs48fc/?pub=4&fbclid=IwAR2WqzggzldBlIZU2Yoep3vPBGHr8A84qL JcNMsFKoPvVds54Ju1GzHPIRI

                    It may take a few years, but proper justice will be served. “I was just doing my job” won’t cut it!

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...