Confused?!

[Hamloc]

Or then there is the legal definition of mischief as writtern in section 430 of the criminal code of Canada

Mischief

430 (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully

(a) destroys or damages property;

(b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;

(c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or

(d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.

So do these definitions of the charge of mischief coincide with your 6 condensed aspects of the EMA that you posted earlier in your opinion?!

[WiltonRanch]

DML cleared it up.

Now the question is what happened to all the law and order conservatives? Have they gone soft on crime?.

In the end not one Conservative premier or leader was willing to say the occupation and border blockades were legal or justified. They all said go home. Since many didn't want to go home what options are left? None except the police forcing them out and arresting the organizers and those who wouldn't cooperate.

Spin it any way you want because the vast majority of Canadians were not in favour of the illegal blockades or occupation.

Yes there was illegality in the actions of protesters to a degree and it will be dealt with to the letter of the law. Law is the law but will the same implementation of the law be followed with political corruption, police brutality, excessive use of power, or other criminal acts carried out by law enforcement or politicians? That double standard is what is gross. It’s kinda like Andy McMehon being paraded in shackles for making a border run with wheat. I am sure you applauded that action but a sick bitch like Karla Homolka gets out of jail and is allowed to live a free life after murdering her own sister in cold blood. I know there is probably no getting through to you as you have to hold your position here but darnit you must think about these things?

[Guest]

And that about sums it up WR
Same as no charges in B.C. terrorism act
It’s all on camera
Everyone knows who they are
Not the first time either by a long shot
Remember , this is a LEGAL pipeline

[Partners]

Watching parliament on cpac.
Where is the TURD??
No where to bee seen on such important debate..
Anyone who supports liberals is totally NUTS....

[TOM4CWB]

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/tamara-lich-bail-hearing-february-19-1.6358307

Chuckle… it can’t be more obvious than her defence lawyers were either drones for the Federal Government or there was no legitimate defence counsel what so ever.

Was this guy acting as legal defence counsel… obviously not an articled lawyer from Ontario?? Obviously he had no legal clue whatsoever… and he said that so eloquently…which any reasonable person would recognize in one second.

How did the judge allow this hearing to go forward … She as judge is dangerously close to bringing Justice into disrepute.

In CWB court hearings …there is no way that this would have been acceptable protocol for a bail hearing.

[Crestliner]

A first year law student can win this argument that there was no mischief. You tubers have hundreds of hours of footage at all angles for 20 days attesting to the peaceful natured protest.

CBC/CTV have spun a different story that most have bought into. The charges are a intimidation tactic that was part of the cleanup Op’s that worked.

I get a kick out of the Chris Barber judge’s comments about that she hasn’t learnt anymore from the hearing that she has already learned from reading the paper. Wow!

Barber and Lich need to get their lawyers to have the cases transferred to Saskatchewan and Alberta where they have a better chance of having it independently adjudicated and away from the swamp creatures.

[chuckChuck]

So do you think the diagolon terrorists with guns in Coutts will get a lenient judge?

Judges don't seem to have much tolerance for a conspiracy to kill cops.

[Hamloc]

So do you think the diagolon terrorists with guns in Coutts will get a lenient judge?

Judges don't seem to have much tolerance for a conspiracy to kill cops.

As far as I know the only place guns were found was at Coutts and let’s be clear the guns were not on site. Coutts was handled and cleared before the imposition of the EMA. Chuck2 to my knowledge you haven't given any real justification for the EMA. Just a bunch of drivel on far right extremism.

[dmlfarmer]

As far as I know the only place guns were found was at Coutts and let’s be clear the guns were not on site. Coutts was handled and cleared before the imposition of the EMA. Chuck2 to my knowledge you haven't given any real justification for the EMA. Just a bunch of drivel on far right extremism.

Hamloc, I am wondering where you are getting your timeline from re ending blockades and the ema.

Friday feb 11. judge grants injunction against ambassador bridge blockade.
Saturday feb 12 police try to clear bridge but fail as protestor numbers continue to grow
Sunday feb 13 night, mounties find the guns in Coutts, border still closed
Monday feb 14th at 7:54 AM EST CBC reports the enactment of the EMA.
Tues 15th ambassador bridge reopens
Tues 15th coutts reopens
wed 16th emerson reopens

I put forward that that police were likely notified before it was publically announced that the EMA would be appliied and that the ema accelerated the police removal of blocklades at all crossing and the opening of the borders

[Hamloc]

Hamloc, I am wondering where you are getting your timeline from re ending blockades and the ema.

Friday feb 11. judge grants injunction against ambassador bridge blockade.
Saturday feb 12 police try to clear bridge but fail as protestor numbers continue to grow
Sunday feb 13 night, mounties find the guns in Coutts, border still closed
Monday feb 14th at 7:54 AM EST CBC reports the enactment of the EMA.
Tues 15th ambassador bridge reopens
Tues 15th coutts reopens
wed 16th emerson reopens

I put forward that that police were likely notified before it was publically announced that the EMA would be appliied and that the ema accelerated the police removal of blocklades at all crossing and the opening of the borders

Dml I challenge you to show me one charge that was laid against protesters that didn’t exist in the existing criminal code before the imposition of the EMA.

Another fact is that during Chrystia Freeland’s announcement of the Emergencies Act she did announce some aspects of the EMA will be made permanent with further legislation. “As of today, all crowdfunding platforms, and the payment service providers they use, must register with FINTRAC and they must report large and suspicious transactions to FINTRAC. The government will also bring forward legislation to provide these authorities to FINTRAC on a permanent basis”.

Are you ok with people that donated $50 or $100 when the protests were considered legal having their bank account frozen? How do we know that the Liberal’s won’t make other aspects of the EMA permanent?