• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three Big Energy Wins In 2019 weather.com Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Integrity_Farmer View Post
    GLOBAL VIDEOS3 days ago

    I posted this directly from Weather.com I do not make up their headlines you might want to argue with them
    Here is the direct post from there site or do you want me to make up the headline for them

    Three Big Energy Wins In 2019
    weather.com
    Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from renewable sources now?
    Perhaps you should consider fact checking your sources. And not spread misinformation before checking its validity. If you had read anything posted on this site in recent years, you would have been aware that the headline couldn't possibly be correct.

    This clickbait type headline is so common in the climate alarmist media, that is has become mandatory to read the actual article, since they rarely say the same thing as the headlines.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
      Yes, you are probably right, seasonal and irregular energy sources just aren't going to be viable against consistent reliable sources.
      Kind of funny really. For how many years have we been trying to explain this simple concept to you , No suddenly you think it's your own idea.
      Hydro decisions are based on water flows. This has nothing to do with intermittent supplies of solar and wind.

      I have never said solar or wind were going to replace all other supplies of electricity. But according to the IEA and Bloomberg they will become significant sources of electricity. But you obviously know more than the IEA and Bloomberg global energy analysis teams!

      But you continue to deny their viability even in the face of their current existence and further implemention across North America, around the world and here on the prairies.

      Remember Saskpower 50% renewables by 2030? They are building significant wind capacity at the moment. Why would they do that if it doesn't work?

      Comment


        #23
        First rule, dont believe fact perpetrated by weathermen.

        Renewable energy is roughly 10% of the entire energy mix in the world. That is sources from solar, wind, hydro and biofuels.

        Burning wood and natural biomass should not be considered renewable. If you cut down a tree and burn it now, you have a carbon balance within the past few decades or so. Its is the exact same thing as burning plant life thats millions of years old and turned to coal or oil, just balancing carbon from a different timeline. One cannot be considered carbon neutral and the other not, they are the same thing.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Remember Saskpower 50% renewables by 2030? They are building significant wind capacity at the moment. Why would they do that if it doesn't work?
          Just trying to duck an economy killing tax.

          if they works so well why didn't skippy buy them? Climate change is a global threat so that means the feds need to find the solution.

          He could have invested in carbon sequestration. Nope, wants to plant a billion more trees to add to our trillion trees.

          Stop defending the indefensible. If its a climate emergency then why isn't the govt putting all infrastructure spending to solar and wind?

          Nope its all about the carbon tax. Its the ultimate squeeze, keep raising it and keep tightening the screws while people have no alternatives.
          Last edited by jazz; Dec 23, 2019, 10:40.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by jazz View Post
            First rule, dont believe fact perpetrated by weathermen.

            Renewable energy is roughly 10% of the entire energy mix in the world. That is sources from solar, wind, hydro and biofuels.

            Burning wood and natural biomass should not be considered renewable. If you cut down a tree and burn it now, you have a carbon balance within the past few decades or so. Its is the exact same thing as burning plant life thats millions of years old and turned to coal or oil, just balancing carbon from a different timeline. One cannot be considered carbon neutral and the other not, they are the same thing.
            Weathermen? You said the same about economists! You probably don't believe anybody with specialized training and expertise if their expertise or facts don't suit your political views.

            Its the flat earth society at work.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              Weathermen? You said the same about economists! You probably don't believe anybody with specialized training and expertise if their expertise or facts don't suit your political views.

              Its the flat earth society at work.
              Yup and still waiting for that super cold winter big snow forecast to come to fruition. Above average temps now predicted into the mid of January, but that will be climate change then wont it.

              These guys have no clue no matter how many phds they add to their name.

              As soon as they gave their dire winter forecast, I knew it would be exactly the opposite. Only in weather and climate studies can you be wrong 100% of the time and still get paid.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	jan.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	70.1 KB
ID:	769237
              Last edited by jazz; Dec 23, 2019, 10:49.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by jazz View Post
                Just trying to duck an economy killing tax.

                if they works so well why didn't skippy buy them? Climate change is a global threat so that means the feds need to find the solution.

                He could have invested in carbon sequestration. Nope, wants to plant a billion more trees to add to our trillion trees.

                Stop defending the indefensible. If its a climate emergency then why isn't the govt putting all infrastructure spending to solar and wind?

                Nope its all about the carbon tax. Its the ultimate squeeze, keep raising it and keep tightening the screws while people have no alternatives.
                Wrong again Einstein. BC has had a carbon tax for a long time and their economy is strong.

                Alberta and Saskatchewan both have a carbon tax on large emitters and a plan to reduce carbon emissions!

                Provinces are responsible for their electricity grids not the federal government.

                Brad Wall invested in CCS at Boundary with federal and provincial government support paid for by taxpayers. It was expensive way to capture carbon and didn't work as planned.

                Trees capture carbon just like crops except they hold it for much longer than annual crops. Wood used in buildings can sequester carbon for many decades.

                Preston Manning supports a carbon tax. He must be a climate radical! LMAO

                Comment


                  #28
                  And this is why you never believe a forecast or a climate study accompanied by a scaremongering headline.

                  https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/canadas-winter-forecast-update-2019-2020-winter-pattern-locks-in-for-january UPDATED: Most of Canada still on track for cold winter

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	jan1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	57.8 KB
ID:	769238
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	feb.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	57.6 KB
ID:	769239
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	mar.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	53.5 KB
ID:	769240
                  Last edited by jazz; Dec 23, 2019, 11:04.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    You are easily distracted Chuck. Much to my surprise, Integrity actually responded, yet you have nothing at all to say about the fake headline about the fake news, just deflecting about CO2 taxes and politicians boondoggles.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by jazz View Post
                      So same question why didn't skippy buy up 500k acres of land in sask and plant trees, solar panels and windmills. Half a million acres dedicated to your wonderful ideas should have solved our problems right?

                      Its so entertaining when hypocrits double down.
                      He doesn't have to Sask Power is busy installing cleaner capacity and reducing emissions on its own.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...