Three Big Energy Wins In 2019 weather.com Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Not sure why I bothered responding to Lack of Integrity Farmer, since he never seems to have the integrity to respond when I call out the errors in his hit and run posts.

But Chuck, you usually stick around and defend the undefendable. Instead of arguing with Jazz about whose definition of hydro is right, do you have an information source that proves Integrity's post correct, and my debunking of it to be wrong?

[Guest]

And the dams are great also
Tobin lake is a great fishery and a lake that is used by 1000’s
But these enviro mentals dont want anything
But just shut their heat and power off and watch them squeal
Most of the dumb bastards dont even know where power and heat comes from
Probably think it comes out of the wall and food out of a supermarket
Best thing that could happen is a complete reset
When that happens it will be survival of the fittest and most of these enviro mental types wont get far
And we will start over
Same as every other time
And strong men will make good times again
Too bad history takes so long and has to be repeated over and over and over again

[jazz]

Someone said that Diefenbaker could take a handful more turbines on it. So could Alameda. Not sure about Tobin and others. Sask could easily expand it hydro pretty fast.

Nukes will go where the coal plants are at Boundary and Cornach.

I am all for it so long as the money and projects stay here in Sask. I will even support money losing windmills and solar panels so long as that money is deployed here.

I will not support any carbon tax type UN directive type policies, no how, never.

[chuckChuck]

Probably cheaper to buy excess hydro from Manitoba which is in the works.

Maybe there are some opportunities for hydro in Sask but Alameda is not one of them as the seasonal water flows are too small and irregular. It is mostly used for recreation and water management on the lower souris watershed into North Dakota. In other words flood control for Minot. Which in 2011 actually didn't work very well.

Nukes are not going to happen anytime soon. Gas first then see how the rest works out. Any affordable storage systems for wind and some solar would make a big difference. But we are not there yet.

[blackpowder]

Something tells me the solar hot water tanks on every roof in rural China wouldn't go over well here.
And the Grand Coulee Dam would never have supplied the Arsenal of Democracy with power if some on here had been in charge.
Same shit different day here on Wienerville.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Maybe there are some opportunities for hydro in Sask but Alameda is not one of them as the seasonal water flows are too small and irregular.

Yes, you are probably right, seasonal and irregular energy sources just aren't going to be viable against consistent reliable sources.
Kind of funny really. For how many years have we been trying to explain this simple concept to you , No suddenly you think it's your own idea.

[samhill]

I’m as far from technology and electric power as you can get https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-ion_battery was used in vehicles 19teens. My neighbour had one in a vehicle and one day government guys showed up and confiscated it. Apparently was a powerful long lasting battery. Wikipedia says was developed in 2004? or something. Not true.
Go figure.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

The saying about a lie being half way around the world before the truth even gets its shoes on rings truer than ever.

So, these alarmists repeat ( with some added embellishments, and outright lies), an untrue, and highly suggestively written piece of propaganda. But leave it in the public domain, with no corrections, or acknowledgement of the mistake, or that their gullibility has been exploited. Just keep passing on the same lies and false information.

[Integrity_Farmer]

Perhaps you should learn to read before posting on Agriville. That is not what it says.



Power being electricity, not total of all energy. And capacity being nameplate capacity, whereas what is defined as a renewable( solar and wind), typically have actual output in the 20-30% range compared to nameplate capacity(edit, UK solar is down in the single digit range). And the vast majority of what they are including as renewables is hydroelectric(not considered renewable by most of the greens), wind and solar are still in the very low single digits. And even if we ignore all of that, it still is nowhere near 1/3 according to any of the recognized energy agencies.

But it sure sounds impressive when you twist a few words around like you did.

GLOBAL VIDEOS3 days ago

I posted this directly from Weather.com I do not make up their headlines you might want to argue with them
Here is the direct post from there site or do you want me to make up the headline for them

Three Big Energy Wins In 2019
weather.com
Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from renewable sources now?

[fjlip]

And because "infallible genius all knowing god" Leonardo says so?

F*ck the SOB crook, liar, billionaire cultist!