• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three Big Energy Wins In 2019 weather.com Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Three Big Energy Wins In 2019 weather.com Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from

    Three Big Energy Wins In 2019
    weather.com
    Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from renewable sources now?

    https://weather.com/en-CA/international/videos/video/three-big-energy-wins-in-2019

    #2
    Originally posted by Integrity_Farmer View Post
    Three Big Energy Wins In 2019
    weather.com
    Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from renewable sources now?

    https://weather.com/en-CA/international/videos/video/three-big-energy-wins-in-2019
    Perhaps you should learn to read before posting on Agriville. That is not what it says.

    Renewable energy sources now account for a third of global power capacity
    Power being electricity, not total of all energy. And capacity being nameplate capacity, whereas what is defined as a renewable( solar and wind), typically have actual output in the 20-30% range compared to nameplate capacity(edit, UK solar is down in the single digit range). And the vast majority of what they are including as renewables is hydroelectric(not considered renewable by most of the greens), wind and solar are still in the very low single digits. And even if we ignore all of that, it still is nowhere near 1/3 according to any of the recognized energy agencies.

    But it sure sounds impressive when you twist a few words around like you did.
    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Dec 22, 2019, 01:41.

    Comment


      #3
      Norway is a good example Integrity Farmer. If you look up Norway 98% of their electricity comes from renewable energy but when you look at the breakdown 95% is from hydroelectricity, 3% wind and solar, 2% fossil fuels. Look at Canada 82% of our electrical generation is GHG free. 60% hydro, 15% nuclear and 7% non-hydro renewables. When you look at it Canada is doing quite well yet we continue to beat ourselves up!

      Comment


        #4
        You lost me as soon as Leo Decrapio gave his endorsement

        Comment


          #5
          God damn details , eh IF ?

          Comment


            #6
            Keep shaming "those people", thanks guys.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
              When you look at it Canada is doing quite well yet we continue to beat ourselves up!
              You mean beat up AB and Sask.

              natural gas and fossil fuels were found before the first hydro dams went up in this country. Of course it made sense to use those resources rather than go build a lot of dams.

              Comment


                #8
                Jazz you are wrong again! Don't let facts get in the way of your arguments! LOL

                https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/hydroelectricity https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/hydroelectricity

                Hydroelectricity History: 1900-1945

                Beginning in the early 1900s, there was rapid growth in the development of hydroelectric-power sites and progressive increases in transmission-voltage levels. More remote sites were exploited and transmission lines were extended to supply the gradual but strong growth in demand for electric power. In 1903 electric power was transmitted to Montréal from a hydro station at Shawinigan, QC, via a 135 km long, 50,000-volt transmission line; by 1910 Ontario Hydro was transmitting hydroelectric power from Niagara Falls on 110,000-volt line.

                By 1900 a total of 133,000 kilowatts (kW) of hydroelectric-generating capacity had been installed in Canada. Most of this capacity was in Québec and Ontario, where attractive hydroelectric-power sites were found near urban centres, though there were some smaller developments in the Maritimes, Alberta, and BC. In the next 10 years, major hydro-generating stations were established in all provinces except for PEI and Saskatchewan. In 1906, the Yukon Gold Company developed a hydro plant on the territory’s Little 12 Mile River. By the early 1950s, hydro facilities were serving both northern territories. Hydroelectric generation was not developed in Saskatchewan until the early 1960s, when the South Saskatchewan River Development provided control and regulation of the province's major river system.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                  Jazz you are wrong again! Don't let facts get in the way of your arguments! LOL
                  We are talking about modern mega concrete buttress style dams that can produce the same type of power that fossil fuels can. They have only been around since the late 50s early 60s. Oil and gas found 10 yrs before that.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    "natural gas and fossil fuels were found before the first hydro dams went up in this country. Of course it made sense to use those resources rather than go build a lot of dams."

                    Jazz you made the above statement which was totally wrong. And then you tried to change what you said. Nice try but like a lot of your statements you get your facts wrong!

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...