Bucket,
As I, in my last post to "Walterm,
I agree this whole levy royalty discussion... has been rather pointless. With Upov 91 and PBR in place... the folks who actually plan and provide valuable genetics... have all the tools needed to be fairly compensated for the Intellectual Property they would be sharing with farmers in western Canada growing cereals with new advanced productivity and quality enhancements that would deserve added income payments."
The 11 to 1 return on public investments... is generally meant to show productivity enhancements, profitability increases.... to commercial grain growers/endusers who enjoy 95% of these ROI gains. As CSGA seed farmer/growers... do not share in levy/royalty revenues collected from All pedigreed seed production... from select seed [down the 7 possible generations to Certified cereal seed sales]... farmer pedigreed multipliers are only collecting and paying the often $1.50/bu royalty... paying 100% to seed co's with the contracts with the plant breeder/institutions... Again for clarity...Cereal pedigreed seed production for farmers who multiply seed to the certified seed level... only involves PAYING ROYALTIES[not getting any portion of these royalties themselves]. As well...Trailing contract royalties would not be a revenue generation source either; for Pedigreed stock seed increases; by farmer pedigreed seed growers[no financial gain projected or expected]...
With a very major seed co[contracting [with plant breeders/institutions] being Secan[who is a non-profit]...as 100% of the increased 'new' royalties will flow into new seed R&D...
And as no funds are paid out to any shareholder/members...
Then This results in our Canadian co-operative based pedigreed seed distribution system itself... naturally as a matter of course... creates a Canadian seed system 'discipline' in our varietal cereal development models... as private profit seed co.s must compete with our Canadian seed co-ops... that are non-profit and return 100% of royalty revenues back to R&D... just as you asked be a part of a future seed system model.
Have a good day, Sincerely Tom
As I, in my last post to "Walterm,
I agree this whole levy royalty discussion... has been rather pointless. With Upov 91 and PBR in place... the folks who actually plan and provide valuable genetics... have all the tools needed to be fairly compensated for the Intellectual Property they would be sharing with farmers in western Canada growing cereals with new advanced productivity and quality enhancements that would deserve added income payments."
The 11 to 1 return on public investments... is generally meant to show productivity enhancements, profitability increases.... to commercial grain growers/endusers who enjoy 95% of these ROI gains. As CSGA seed farmer/growers... do not share in levy/royalty revenues collected from All pedigreed seed production... from select seed [down the 7 possible generations to Certified cereal seed sales]... farmer pedigreed multipliers are only collecting and paying the often $1.50/bu royalty... paying 100% to seed co's with the contracts with the plant breeder/institutions... Again for clarity...Cereal pedigreed seed production for farmers who multiply seed to the certified seed level... only involves PAYING ROYALTIES[not getting any portion of these royalties themselves]. As well...Trailing contract royalties would not be a revenue generation source either; for Pedigreed stock seed increases; by farmer pedigreed seed growers[no financial gain projected or expected]...
With a very major seed co[contracting [with plant breeders/institutions] being Secan[who is a non-profit]...as 100% of the increased 'new' royalties will flow into new seed R&D...
And as no funds are paid out to any shareholder/members...
Then This results in our Canadian co-operative based pedigreed seed distribution system itself... naturally as a matter of course... creates a Canadian seed system 'discipline' in our varietal cereal development models... as private profit seed co.s must compete with our Canadian seed co-ops... that are non-profit and return 100% of royalty revenues back to R&D... just as you asked be a part of a future seed system model.
Have a good day, Sincerely Tom
Originally posted by bucket
View Post
Comment