101, you are one of the few here that can still think. I know the spreads vary but at the worst in your chart they are still $5/%. In '12 - '13 they were almost nothing. My research historically compared #2, 14.5% to feed and showed an average spread of $79/t. It was never worse than $40/t. My numbers also show spreads very narrow in the summer, wider the other 3 seasons. Don't know why.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bet on the CWB
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by CptnObvious View PostThe only time the CWB was subsidized by the taxpayer was once in 1935.
The PPO program was flying high in 07/08 until the short position in Minneapolis caused a 467 million dollar loss and a hit to the whole program to the tune of 89.5 million
Comment
-
101, the program had its' hazards and was replaced. Are you saying that that one $89.5 million loss( not subsidized by the taxpayer as was the original point... but not important...Oh wait, I see your emphasis) was worse than the $1b, $2b, and sometimes $3 billion losses in every year since the end of the CWB?
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by CptnObvious View PostThe CWB was proven a fair trader more than a dozen times in U.S. courts. A five year survey done not long before the CWB was murdered showed that Canadian wheat priced higher than U.S. wheat in American mills 59/60 months. The only time the CWB was subsidized by the taxpayer was once in 1935. The CWB was able to use its' reputation for quality to differentially price into different markets, and to make customers want 'Canadian' brand wheat. To say the CWB wouldn't work today because nobody cares where the grain is from because the CWB isn't there to make a difference is circular reasoning.
Comment
-
The Pease was part of the CWB. Ontario grew medium protein wheat and sold most of it very close to home. I'm sure you've had the exact same point explained to you a dozen times. Different place, different problems, different solutions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sumdumguy View PostIf the CWB was so frickin great, why weren't Ontario and Peace River farmers screaming to be included? Just to answer my own question - they knew how Western farmers were being hosed and wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sumdumguy View PostIf the CWB was so frickin great, why weren't Ontario and Peace River farmers screaming to be included? Just to answer my own question - they knew how Western farmers were being hosed and wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole!
BUT the Eastern MP's did mount a united front to divorce Quebec and Ontario from ever being part of the initial Designated area legislation
They weren't stupid. Nor socialists. Tommy Douglas was the loudmouth loser who pushed for Western farmers' grain to be nationally governed.
Yup. Another Saskatchewan premier, remember him?, tried to corral Saskies into state farming, just as China does. Communism.
Both Eastern provinces were delighted to see their grain sell anywhere in Canada, or anywhere in the world, with all licensing requirements fulfilled by the CWB; the licensing costs paid for by only Western farmers, no buybacks, and no licensing refusals
Suckers. Pars.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment