• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'This is possible. We did it': the week Portugal ran on renewables

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    'This is possible. We did it': the week Portugal ran on renewables

    'This is possible. We did it': the week Portugal ran on renewables

    Campaigners say the 107 hours when the country was powered by wind, sun and water show they can replace fossil fuels

    Sam Jones in Alto Minho
    @swajones

    Monday 26 December 2016 08.00 GMT
    Last modified on Monday 26 December 2016 08.02 GMT
    Comments
    214

    If you can keep your gaze off the hilltops, imagine away the pylons and forget the occasional tractor of an uncertain vintage coughing along the narrow roads, little appears to have changed in the valleys of north-eastern Portugal for decades, perhaps even centuries.

    The gnarled alvarinho vines have been relieved of their fruit to make vinho verde, an old woman in black herds her sheep through a hamlet and hungry eagles hover over the fields, scanning the land for lunch.

    But look up, past the villages, the clumps of stout ponies and the wolf-haunted forests of pine, oak and eucalyptus, and the harbingers of an environmental revolution are silhouetted against the December sky.

    The 130 giant wind turbines that sprout from the peaks, slicing the air with a rhythmic sigh, have helped Portugal to a remarkable achievement. For four and a half days in May the country ran entirely on electricity from renewable sources: wind, hydro and solar power.

    Despite fears of a blackout, the lights stayed on for a record 107 hours between 6.45am on Saturday 7 May and 5.45pm the following Wednesday.

    Francisco Ferreira, president of the Portuguese environmental NGO Zero, got wind of what was going on when a friend called that weekend. “He said: ‘I’ve been looking at the graphs and for the past two days we’ve been 100% renewable on electricity production.’ After that, we looked at the data and arrived at 107 hours. We confirmed it with the national energy network, who said we’d had 4.5 days.

    “It was great to see that the system was working; to see that we could manage all these renewables even though the circumstances were quite challenging.”

    Ferreira and his fellow clean energy advocates hold up those few days as further proof that renewables can reliably replace fossil fuels.

    Things may have been helped along by the fact that a good chunk of the 107 hours fell over the weekend – when demand is lower – and by an unusually co-operative Mother Nature, who saw to it that the sun shone and the wind blew favourably.

    But supporters of renewable power insist it was down to much more than luck. António Sá da Costa, managing director of the Portuguese renewable energy association Apren, argues it was the result of years of investment and cooperation.

    “It was the coming together of three factors, without which none if it would have been possible,” he says. “The first was that we had the power plants in place to take advantage of the natural conditions during that period; second, it was only possible because of the wind, water and sun. The third was that we had the operational grid capability – in terms of both distribution and transportation – to manage this type of situation.”

    Yes, the timing was lucky, he adds. But that does not lessen the achievement of linking up hundreds of dispersed renewable power plants instead of taking the easier option of relying on production from one large thermal one.

    Or, to put it a little more pithily: “When Cristiano Ronaldo scores a goal, people say it was lucky. No. It wasn’t lucky. It was a lot of training, a lot of preparation and a lot of things. In our case it wasn’t just luck.”

    Sá da Costa traces Portugal’s interest in renewable energy back to 1970, when almost all the electricity consumed in the country was from renewable hydropower plants.

    However, as the country developed economically, demand outstripped supply, forcing it to look to more conventional sources. It wasn’t until the end of the last century when windfarms appeared in Madeira and, later, on the mainland, that people started to take renewables more seriously.

    Although Portugal has been a frontrunner on clean energy for more than a decade – Altos Minhos was Europe’s largest onshore windfarm when it opened eight years ago – the country’s weather and geography have yet to be fully harnessed.

    Portugal’s climate varies between wet and dry years. In wet years, hydropower is the main source of energy, followed by wind and coal. In dry years, however, coal is first, followed by wind and hydro.

    According to Apren’s figures, renewable energy has been responsible for 59% of national energy production during a wet 2016, with 41% from fossil fuels. Hydro power has yielded 32%, wind 25%, and solar close to 2%.

    Efforts to increase the renewable sector have been hit by Portugal’s economic crisis, which has spooked would-be investors and slowed growth.

    Sá de Costa and Ferreira both say the country has to do far more to exploit its thousands of annual hours of sunshine through the creation of more solar farms.

    “That’s the real push we need for the future,” says Ferreira. “In the winter, between November and June, hydro and wind can probably guarantee [things]. But from May or June to October and November, we could rely less on wind, and much less on hydro.”

    Despite the slowdown, Sá de Costa is bullish about Portugal’s capacity to comfortably meet and exceed EU targets for member states to have at least a 27% share of renewable energy consumption by 2030. With sufficient investment and construction – more windfarms and many more solar farms – he believes that Portugal could be on course to generate 60% of its energy through renewables by 2020 and 100% by 2040.

    Jorge Seguro Sanches, Portugal’s energy secretary, says the country is on track to see renewable energy accounting for 31% of its energy use by 2020. He also says the government is heavily promoting a solar power programme as part of its plans to reduce dependence on oil imports and foster the development of a sustainable technology hub.

    “In the past few years, we have seen a prosperous boom in windfarms,” he says. “Nevertheless, the market nowadays is oriented towards photovoltaic solar energy, as a result of its high technological development and the decline of investment costs. This is a new path for the near future, [and] will guarantee the sustainability of the Portuguese electricity system.”

    In the misty valleys of Alto Minho, the windfarm is gradually becoming part of the landscape. Long-horned barrosã cattle graze among the 80-metre-high turbines and seek out their shade in summer. Hunters in pursuit of boar, rabbits and birds still crisscross the hillsides but keep a respectful distance from the technicians who service the plant. Sometimes, the odd wolf is glimpsed far below the sweeping blades.

    For Sá da Costa, who has something of the glee of a prophet seeing his predictions coming true, those four and a half days in May were the best possible riposte to the naysayers.

    “Now no one can come along and say in good conscience that this is impossible. No. This is possible. Because we did it. And if we did it, it’s also possible in other countries. It’s just a question of finding how to do it.”

    #2
    Chuck2 this is a quote from an article by John Miller on theenergycollective.com:"wind and solar power have average capacity factors of 33% and 20-25% respectively. This means during a given period of time(day,week,etc) renewables wind/solar is only capable of supplying full design power generation capacity to the grid on-average about 20-33% of the time. Since wind and solar are variable and unpredictable, peaking power must be online 100% of the time. Peaking power must be online at some minimum rate and available to quickly adjust to variable renewables power supply changes as required to continuously control power grids supply-demand balances within operating safe limits". So if I understand system design correctly you must first have a base load supplied by hydro or nuclear or coal which supplies your minimum required power to keep the lights on. Then you add generation like renewables to supply some of the demands as power demands peak. Then natural gas can be used to make up the lack of power due to renewables variability. Natural gas works well because it can be ramped up quickly.

    As for bragging Portugal ran for 4 1/2 days on renewables, you make me laugh. It stated Portugal was in a wet year which increased hydro and 4 1/2 days fits within the 20-33% parameter. If geographically Alberta was suited to producing a lot of hydro electricity I think 100% renewable could be done. We are not, so therefore this is a dead end road that will cost us a lot of money with a less than ideal end result.

    Comment


      #3
      List of power stations in Portugal
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      [show]Map all coordinates using OSM
      Map all coordinates using Google
      Map up to 200 coordinates using Bing
      The following page lists some power stations in Portugal.

      Contents [hide]
      1 Cogeneration
      2 Geothermal
      3 Hydroelectric
      4 Thermal
      5 See also
      6 References
      Cogeneration[edit]
      Station District Capacity (MW) Primary fuel Coordinates Year commissioned Status
      Barreiro Cogeneration Station Setúbal 64,5 MW Fuel oil 38.675434°N 9.054489°W 1979 Operational
      Geothermal[edit]
      Station District Coordinates Capacity (MW) Year commissioned Status
      Pico Vermelho Power Station[1] 12 Operational
      Ribeira Grande Power Station[2] 16 Operational
      Hydroelectric[edit]
      Main article: List of hydroelectric power stations in Portugal
      Station District Capacity (MW) River Type Coordinates Year commissioned Status
      Aguieira Dam Coimbra 336 MW Mondego Pumped-storage 40.340200°N 8.197000°W 1981 Operational
      Alto Lindoso Dam Viana do Castelo 630 MW Limia Pumped-storage 41.872835°N 8.204075°W 1992 Operational
      Alto Rabagão Dam Montalegre 68? MW Rabagão River Pumped-storage 41.7395°N 7.857611°W 1964 Operational
      Alqueva Dam Évora/Beja 259.2 MW (Stage 1)
      259.2 MW (Stage 2) Guadiana Pumped-storage 38.195562°N 7.497708°W 2004 (Stage 1)
      2013 (Stage 2) Operational
      Bemposta Dam Bragança 240 MW (Stage 1)
      191 MW (Stage 2) Douro Run-of-the-river 41.300991°N 6.470025°W 1964 (Stage 1)
      2011 (Stage 2) Operational
      Cabril Dam Castelo Branco/Leiria 108 MW Zêzere Conventional 39.917270°N 8.132440°W 1954 Operational
      Carrapatelo Dam Porto/Viseu 201 MW Douro Run-of-the-river 41.084871°N 8.130218°W 1971 Operational
      Castelo de Bode Dam Santarém 159 MW Zêzere Conventional 39.543772°N 8.319936°W 1951 Operational
      Crestuma-Lever Dam Porto 117 MW Douro Run-of-the-river 41.070882°N 8.485744°W 1985 Operational
      Miranda Dam Bragança 180 MW (Stage 1)
      189 MW (Stage 2) Douro Run-of-the-river 41.488600°N 6.265600°W 1960 (Stage 1)
      1995 (Stage 2) Operational
      Picote Dam Bragança 195 MW (Stage 1)
      246 MW (Stage 2) Douro Run-of-the-river 41.378302°N 6.351589°W 1958 (Stage 1)
      2011 (Stage 2) Operational
      Pocinho Dam Guarda 186 MW Douro Run-of-the-river 41.134103°N 7.114131°W 1982 Operational
      Régua Dam Vila Real 180 MW Douro Run-of-the-river 41.147998°N 7.739552°W 1973 Operational
      Salamonde Dam Braga 42 MW (Stage 1)
      207 MW (Stage 2) Cávado Conventional 41.690886°N 8.091744°W 1953 (Stage 1)
      2015 (Stage 2) Operational
      Santa Luzia Dam Coimbra 32 MW Unhais Conventional 40.089233°N 7.857365°W 1942 Operational
      Valeira Dam Viseu 240 MW Douro Run-of-the-river 41.160763°N 7.377368°W 1976 Operational
      Vilarinho das Furnas Dam Braga 125 MW Homem Conventional 41.762177°N 8.208314°W 1972 Operational
      Thermal[edit]
      Station District Capacity (MW) Primary fuel Coordinates Year commissioned Status
      Carregado Power Station Lisbon 710 MW Fuel oil 39.013575°N 8.956032°W 1969 Decommissioned (2010)?
      Lares Power Station Coimbra 826 MW Natural gas 40.124642°N 8.775103°W 2009 Operational
      Pego I Power Station Santarém 576 MW Coal 39.468189°N 8.109219°W 1993 Operational
      Pego II Power Station Santarém 837 MW Natural gas 39.468189°N 8.109219°W 2010 Operational
      Ribatejo Power Station Lisbon 1176 MW Natural gas 39.011486°N 8.951413°W 2005 Operational
      Setúbal Power Station Setúbal 946 MW Fuel oil / Natural gas 38.509280°N 8.844791°W 1979 Decommissioned (09/2012)?
      Sines Power Station Setúbal 1180 MW Coal 37.932423°N 8.803992°W 1985 Operational
      Tapada do Outeiro I Power Station Porto 150 MW Coal 41.067306°N 8.459356°W 1959 Decommissioned (2004)
      Tapado do Outeiro II Power Station Porto 990 MW Natural gas 41.069651°N 8.459734°W 1999 Operational
      Tunes Power Station Faro 165 MW Diesel 37.165166°N 8.263410°W 1973 Operational

      Comment


        #4
        It was of note in Portugal because they had hydro wind and solar working together and managed to make it work for a short period of time. Quebec and Manitoba have excess hydro capacity.

        Changing to renewables will occur over a long period of time. You and I will be dead in the next decades before all this happens. All systems need to be rebuilt at some point including coal. Renewables can't replace fossil at this point but can reduce the amount of coal or gas used.

        I will leave it to the experts to design and operate the system. It will be a unique system suited to each country, province, region, city, town,village, and farm.

        The point is, much of technology is in place to adopt alot more renewables and that is what is happening in many countries.

        Comment


          #5
          Good on them for what they have done. But factor in "combined with the recent financial crisis was responsible for the stable consumption over the last 10 years"; Then there is the deserved or undeserved "Three pigs " comment about certain EU countries if I'm not mistaken. And as admitted "transportation sector" needs a lot of changes before its all green. So they've made progress in some areas greater than other parts of the world. But 30 km range for electric cars just doesn't cut it for farm trucks in two and three foot snowdrifts I've got to navigate this morning. The pond is frozen over to my hydroelectric plant; the sun isn't shining and the wind does blow. There being a slight problem that windmills may never be in sight for reasons of it still being considered by wind experts as still not the appropriate area to invest and place such structures (due to overall wind speeds and continuous dependability concerns)

          [B]None the less it does show that proper conditions and the will to implement are most important factors in moving "forward"/B] But is it premature to call for the draining of those dams; mothballing and recycling the backup infrastructure? Remember the dams may indeed become useful to pump water into (uphill to store and later reuse.)


          Portugal – Moving to 100% renewables
          by Energiewende Team
          06 Jun 2016
          In April 2016, Portugal’s electricity generation came almost entirely from renewable energies (95,5%) and ran in early May on RES generation exclusively for 107 hours straight. A transition to 100% renewable energies is thus closer than ever in the country. Rita Antunes and Francisco Ferreira from ZERO – Association for the Sustainability of the Earth System explain.

          The Alto Lindoso dam in Portugal looks like a usual lake.
          The Alto Lindoso dam is the largest hydroelectric power station in Portugal. (Photo by PatríciaR / Patrícia, modified, CC BY-SA 3.0)

          In 2005, renewable electricity in Portugal achieved only 16% of the total production of electricity – 8616 GWh. Back then, half of the renewables electricity production came form large dams (>30 MW), while wind power and biomass represented 20% each and PV only a very small share (3 GWh).

          In 2010, Portugal crossed the threshold of 50% of renewable sources in electricity production. This achievement was the result of government policies implemented in the beginning of the century. This policy resulted in a wind power capacity increase of 3.5 times and almost 45 times of PV from 2005 to 2010. At the same time, large dams were retrofitted to increase the possibility of pumped storage to enable better management of electricity production.

          Since 2010, electricity from renewable energy sources has remained steadily above 50% with an overall upward trend, even though actual figures varied throughout the years depending on the amount of rainfall and the consequent final contribution of hydropower. In 2014, Portugal had 63% of electricity demand assured by renewable sources.

          2016 has been an impressive year with new records. With 6024 MW capacity installed in hydro (5360 MW in large dams), 5033 MW in wind, 566 MW in biomass, 474 MW in PV, and 29 MW in geothermal, a transition to 100% is already happening in Portugal. In April 2016, renewable sources provided 95.5% of the electricity demand (the second best month overall in this century). Recently, Portugal broke the record for the most number of hours running straight on 100 percent renewable electricity energy sources. The country ran on wind, hydro, and hydropower energy for 107-hours straight from 6:45 a.m. May 7 to 5:45 p.m. May 11. Throughout this four-day period, Portugal managed to provide 575 GWh of electricity without the contribution of any non-renewable sources, such as gas and coal. Portugal has set a new renewable energy milestone with the combination of renewable sources and the capacity to manage the grid with very limited international interconnections, particularly between Spain and France.

          Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (also called “RES Directive”) sets the objective of meeting at least 20% of the EU’s final energy consumption with renewable energy sources by 2020. Portugal committed itself to a share of renewable sources of 31% of final energy consumption by then. Eurostat figures for 2014 show that 27% of Portugal’s total energy consumption (not just electricity) already came from renewable sources.

          The main challenge continues to be the GHG emissions from the transport sector where the large-scale introduction of electric vehicles did not happen yet, despite early investments in a public charging infrastructure. This shift is crucial in order to meet the target in this sector.

          On the supply side, it is necessary and urgent to increase PV production. It is necessary to combine the wind and hydro production (mostly during winter and spring) with PV (mostly during summer), to achieve a higher average of renewable production along the year. The new auto-consumption law privileges PV technology, even though there are some legal barriers to achieve “one roof, one PV panel”.

          Portugal has been investing in energy efficiency in the past years, which, combined with the recent financial crisis was responsible for the stable consumption over the last 10 years. Continuing efforts on energy efficiency and energy savings are crucial to meet the renewable targets. The transport sector and in particular the implementation of soft modes of transportation is very important.

          For 2015, Portugal achieved under its green growth commitment already a 30 to 40% GHG reduction from 2005, 40% renewables in final energy consumption, and a 30% reduction of the energy demand compared with the reference scenario.

          The above described achievements show that Portugal is heading in the right direction and can accelerate in 2016 the transition for 100% renewables. These results show that policy measures taken 10-15 years ago can make the difference. That is why it is now necessary to set a new package of increasingly ambitious measures to get results in 2030. To accelerate this transition, it is necessary to shift the demand from primary energy on fossil fuels to electricity, to get a higher share of renewable electricity in final energy consumption. The transport sector is one of the most important ones in this transition.

          Portugal, without yet clearly assuming a transition to a zero emissions society, is on track. The Portuguese Environment Minister, Mr. João Matos Fernandes, said during the signature ceremony of the Paris Agreement in the United Nations: “Portugal is prepared to go forward. Our goal is a future without carbon emissions”. Now, we need to move from talk to action. We need a plan to continue this transition along the next decades, but a cleaner future is becoming a reality in Portugal.

          Comment


            #6
            QUOTE
            When Cristiano Ronaldo scores a goal, people say it was lucky. No. It wasn’t lucky. It was a lot of training, a lot of preparation and a lot of things. In our case it wasn’t just luck
            UNQUOTE

            Oh so true.

            Comment


              #7
              QUOTE
              I will leave it to the experts to design and operate the system. It will be a unique system suited to each country, province, region, city, town,village, and farm.
              UNQUOTE

              If it is all left to the experts they will design the least complicated system and stifle bidirectional meters and thousands of little interconnections that sap a considerable revenue stream off their bottom line; complicate their lives and interfere with corporate self interests. The proof is how little has been done (until maybe recently) with implementing non conventional solutions; cogeneration and even non utilization and examples of outright wastes of most energy sources.
              Just to keep those experts honest.. there need to be entry options available (with access as simple as safety considerations allow); for access to your required necessary backup (which is going to usually be your electrical supplier.) Sure its not for everyone; but innovation comes from the most unexpected sources.

              There are good reasons why red tape is seen as too onerous as much as reasons red tape must be present.

              Comment


                #8
                Let's follow the money!

                Portugal is part of the pigs the bankrupt countries in Europe.

                Portugal
                Italy
                Greece
                Spain

                Ah all these ideas of not working and living off the grid work so well.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well good for ****ing Portugal. What's the temp there today and how deep is the snow? I'm in the middle of a blizzard. The snow on the flat is too deep for a JD 7520 MFD tractor. Electric tractors wouldn't go 10 feet and the battery would be dead. It won't ****ing work here.

                  Photovoltaic? Hah. The sun isn't shining and the snow is so deep on every roof there would be no hope to capture solar.

                  Six miles south of me, in ND, there is a wind farm. There you can find dead birds easily on the ground around them. All over. Different species from small songbirds up. They are already ugly. Just wait til they get rusty like the older ones in Kansas.

                  Portugal can do what they want, but forcing us to renewables just because a privileged dufus got elected with pie in the sky ideas about what Canada should look like, and no real understanding of our geographies and realities, is just wrong.

                  Today I want diesel power, deleted emissions shit, more hp and all those granola munchers can move to Portugal.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Take a look at Sweden's energy system which has a climate more like Canada's.
                    https://sweden.se/society/energy-use-in-sweden/

                    Large share of renewable energy

                    Sweden managed to reach its goal of a 50 per cent renewable energy share several years ahead of the Swedish government’s 2020 schedule, in 2012. The most recent figure of 52 per cent for renewable energy – including electricity, district heating and fuel – is the highest in the EU.

                    Sweden introduced green electricity certification in 2003 to promote renewable energy. To qualify, electricity must come from wind, solar, geothermal or wave power, biofuels or small-scale hydroelectric plants. Electricity retailers are required to buy a proportion of ‘green electricity’ as part of their normal supply, while power producers receive certification for the renewable electricity they generate.

                    The goal is to boost renewable generation by 25 TWh from 2002 to 2020. At present, Sweden is slightly more than halfway to this target, due chiefly to the increased use of biofuels and a steadily expanding wind power programme.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Was just gonna say that SF3. Too many deadbeats sitting on there ass in that country. More worried about renewable shit that costs a ton of money that they can't afford.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        cc.

                        How far along their path would Sweden be if instead of occupying 450,000 km2, they were spread out over 9,985000 km2?
                        Now I'm asking you to be realistic with your %ages.

                        Nuclear, hydroelectric, and biofuel have many detractors of a proper heat source.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          So ChuckChuck is partly going to depend on MB Hydro for his renewables. Every span of hydro line there's what used to be a tree that was probably 200 years old. How many tons of carbon did that sequester over a lifetime? If Chuck is going to depend on the workers of the IBEW to keep the lights on and the heat pumping he'll shivering in the dark a lot. The grid out here can't even support the aeration fans most of us now have let alone Justin and Chuck's electric car chargers.

                          Wind? It costs more to build a wind farm than can be returned in revenue to cover the capital costs within the lifetime of the equipment. Most of the projects here were pushed by farmers that were struggling financially it was their "hope" for outside revenue. The other side of wind farms wanted to build for the carbon credits. Now ugly windmills are blocking what used to a pretty unspoiled skyline.

                          I support biofuels but how long will it be before the food before fuel crowd quashes advances there?

                          Emissions from engines? We traded emissions for extra urea production, packaging, transportation of DEF. Also, DEF engines seem to have higher fuel consumption, how does that help? Plus, they just don't work well. Thanks Kyoto Asshole Accord.

                          As far as renewables AT THIS TIME, all we are doing is trading energy sources at a net cost, with poorer performance.

                          Re Sweden, I don't care about Sweden. Sweden isn't Canada. We shouldn't compare ourselves to any nation on this issue. Our challenges and solutions must be our own.

                          Do the right thing and change your name to ChuckJustin before it's too late and our economy and nation are ruined.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Braveheart

                            The Keeyask Project is a 695-megawatt which will be ready for 2021, just wondering why you feel MB Hydro will not have more than enough power for Manitobain's along with plenty for export? Not saying the whole province can be heated entirely on Hydro.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Delivery of the service and maintenance (hydro). Businesses and industries are waiting months or up to a year for service installation. Latest example is an Inetlink internet tower that was 4 months behind in hookup.

                              Locally, the wiring inspector went into a local farm equipment dealer and told him to quit selling aeration fans as the rural grid can't handle any more load here. He was told to screw off. I know at least 2 farmers that installed gen sets when hydro denied their permits for a pair of new single phase fans that were only 15 hp. They (hydro) said the starting would draw too many amps for the local grid.

                              My brother in law works for MB Hydro and says that staff such as lineman have not been replaced as retirements happened and staff levels here are at 50-60% of a few years ago, yet aging transmission lines are requiring more maintenance.

                              So, do I have faith that those 2 ton service trucks parked at curling rinks, hockey arenas and grocery stores can deliver extra power from a new generating station, I say not hardly.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...