• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First Nations lay claim to all critical minerals

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Enjoy the free open debate no matter how much you offend someone or get offended. Only intolerance shuts it down.

    Comment


      #12
      So jazz starts a post the majority of us should be concerned about and a few asshats want it shut down and start deflecting?

      I’m not sure why the Indians think this their land, it never was, we are all native to this world, unless we were dropped off by aliens.

      Comment


        #13
        Think there’s lot of baiting and trolling which goes on to antagonize one particular member because even their Mensa intellect does not see the obvious and likewise it goes back. This is the reason reality tv is so popular and why a heel of questionable moral character and intelligence with a big mouth is needed for conflict. Saskfarmer and Grassfarmer would battle over stupid shit but grass was at least bright enough to know the score and bow out before it consumed him. He wasn’t such a radical partisan that he found clarity and the ability to walk away. Some are so radical they can’t.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
          What is a saying about One bad Apple.
          I dont know, I just think that 50c fluctuations in canola or change in urea prices is far less impactful than the regulations and polices being thrown at this industry now and supported by people who should know better. I think that needs more awareness but apparently some dont. Thats trolling to them.

          Imagine a police whereby the natives redefine treaties as mineral rights like they are pushing in that article and get a direct royalty cut from these REEs that will be pulled from potash tailings and abandoned wells and the farmer doesnt. Thats a slippery slope to getting a cut of your canola crop to which they have proposed as well. Resource reparations.

          I mean thats fine, lets farm in ignorance then and let the chips fall.
          Last edited by jazz; Apr 2, 2023, 17:30.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by jazz View Post
            I dont know, I just think that 50c fluctuations in canola or change in urea prices is far less impactful than the regulations and polices being thrown at this industry now and supported by people who should know better. I think that needs more awareness but apparently some dont. Thats trolling to them.

            Imagine a police whereby the natives redefine treaties as mineral rights like they are pushing in that article and get a direct royalty cut from these REEs that will be pulled from potash tailings and abandoned wells and the farmer doesnt. Thats a slippery slope to getting a cut of your canola crop to which they have proposed as well. Resource reparations.

            I mean thats fine, lets farm in ignorance then and let the chips fall.
            While I don't always agree with you, you are certainly not the bad apple I was referring to.

            Thanks for bringing these issues to our attention.

            Comment


              #16
              And to think I got called a troll for bringing this up. More than just a rumor now if Moe is sounding the alarm.

              https://windspeaker.com/news/windspe...ements-will-be

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	102.1 KB
ID:	774880

              Comment


                #17
                Another example of why Canada will now be considered politically unstable for investors.

                When you have made investments and the few in leadership make wholesale changes to laws leaving you money stranded investments will soon dry up.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
                  Another example of why Canada will now be considered politically unstable for investors.

                  When you have made investments and the few in leadership make wholesale changes to laws leaving you money stranded investments will soon dry up.
                  The argument against separation is that the process will scare away investment. For a short period of time while the process is under way. Absolutely correct.
                  But the alternative is that perpetual state of instability, which becomes a permanent state of political instability.
                  Short term pain for long term gain.
                  We aren't Quebec relying on secondary or tertiary industries(before they became entirely reliant on government industries), this is primary resource extraction. The resources will still be there a few years later after we have removed the cancer known as Ottawa. The capital will come back.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    This is an example of what the current leadership will do to pick up a few % points.

                    Don't underestimate their ability's to play politics.

                    They have their media lap dogs and they will have a clear plan of attack.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      USA here we come.

                      Or just maybe it’s the reason the turd wants our guns, there’s a reason he’s not getting the guns.

                      Farmland will be next on the list.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...