• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Canada has been sold a false promise of being an ‘energy superpower’

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blackpowder
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 9386

    #61
    Agree with Land.
    Norway has done a good job, we have not.
    But it's not a simple comparison.
    Well head to refinery different.
    Size of political jurisdiction as beneficiary.
    A miniscule mountain country with one identity.
    A lot more political spillage and far more production cost.
    Far less people living off the fat.
    I'd say the whole of Canada is squandering it's oil income.
    More than AB produce. All spend.

    Honestly, we could live like Norwegians here and it wouldn't be enough and still our fault.

    Comment

    • furrowtickler
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2004
      • 22362

      #62
      Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
      Agree with Land.
      Norway has done a good job, we have not.
      But it's not a simple comparison.
      Well head to refinery different.
      Size of political jurisdiction as beneficiary.
      A miniscule mountain country with one identity.
      A lot more political spillage and far more production cost.
      Far less people living off the fat.
      I'd say the whole of Canada is squandering it's oil income.
      More than AB produce. All spend.

      Honestly, we could live like Norwegians here and it wouldn't be enough and still our fault.
      About as common sense post as one can get about this thread

      Comment

      • blackpowder
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 9386

        #63
        And AB gets the blame exclusively.
        Sick of it.

        Comment

        • chuckChuck
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2006
          • 13136

          #64
          Alberta has chosen not to save their one time resource revenue. Instead they have given lower taxes and spend it on core spending instead of saving it for when the oil revenues decline and investing in diversification.

          Saskatchewan has the same mentality.

          Low royalties, low taxes. Treat the non renewable resources as owned by the resource sector instead of owned by the citizens and province.

          Neither province is requiring the industry to clean up the mess of orphan wells.

          Its take the money and run!

          Comment

          • shtferbrains
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2017
            • 5332

            #65
            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
            Alberta has chosen not to save their one time resource revenue. Instead they have given lower taxes and spend it on core spending instead of saving it for when the oil revenues decline and investing in diversification

            Low royalties, low taxes.
            Chuck, you should do a little more than read what CBC pushes to you?
            Norway has 10 yrs of reserves.
            Alberta has 100 yrs +++
            Think about that before you give us your Norway pitch for the 50th time.

            Comment

            • chuckChuck
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2006
              • 13136

              #66
              Yeah and most of those reserves will stay in the ground.

              Harper said we would stop burning fossil fuels by the year 2100.

              The tar sands are some of the dirtiest, most energy intensive oil on earth to extract.






              Comment

              • shtferbrains
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2017
                • 5332

                #67
                And right back with some more CBC facts?

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...