• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Leaked SaskPower documents show 'extreme' risk in $26B coal refurbishment plan

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chuckChuck
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 12940

    Leaked SaskPower documents show 'extreme' risk in $26B coal refurbishment plan

    Leaked SaskPower documents show 'extreme' risk in $26B coal refurbishment plan

    A leaked SaskPower document indicates SaskPower was told the provincial government's decision to double down on coal would bring an "extreme" risk.

    The NDP Opposition says the document it shared with media on Wednesday should raise more concerns about the province's 25-year, $26 billion plan ([url]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-coal-power-cost-9.7191232[/url]) to refurbish and extend the life of its coal-fired power plants.

    "There is no way to make this make sense," said Aleana Young, the NDP's critic for the Crown Investments Corporation.

    The document was a decision item presented to SaskPower's audit and finance committee on Nov. 5, 2025, and then its board of directors on Nov. 20. The executive summary calls it "a transitional plan that reflects Government of Saskatchewan direction to life extend coal-fired generation for up to 25 years."

    It indicates that SaskPower's finance department had prepared an estimate of the rate impact if the plan was adopted.

    "In absolute terms relative to rates in 2025, the average cost of electricity is projected to be 20% higher in 2030 and 95% higher in 2040," it reads.

    That calculation was made with the assumption that the federal industrial carbon tax would not be in place. The province may have stopped collecting carbon pricing from SaskPower customers, but it still has obligations under the federal regime ([url]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-industrial-carbon-tax-sask-power-9.7035079[/url]).

    The document indicates that coal units are high-emitting and the corresponding carbon tax payments on coal generation "are extremely large."
    • Price estimate for Sask.'s refit of coal-fired power plants climbs to $26B ([url]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-coal-power-cost-9.7191232[/url])
    Although the briefing note says the provincial and federal governments are negotiating on industrial emissions, Young said she believes the news Alberta will still have to pay industrial carbon pricing ([url]https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/alberta-mou-carbon-pricing-9.7197919[/url]) means Saskatchewan will not be spared.

    "I cannot fathom where rates would go," Young said. Minister not made available


    Since obtaining a copy of the document, CBC News has made repeated attempts to get a response from Crown Investments Corporation Minister Jeremy Harrison.

    Harrison did not directly respond when asked by the NDP about the document on Wednesday in question period, and he was not made available to media after question period.

    Instead, the government provided a prepared statement from SaskPower CEO Rupen Pandya, who seemed to confirm the document's authenticity, saying that various scenarios, analyses and options are reviewed internally before decisions are made.

    The Saskatchewan NDP released new, leaked documents from SaskPower that show the Crown corporation was advised of the "extreme" risks associated with the government's $26 billion plan to refurbish and extend the life of its coal-fired power plants.

    "Those decisions should not be confused with finalized government direction or policy," his statement said.

    "Public confidence is not served when confidential internal deliberations are taken out of context." Plan has 'extreme' risk: document


    The document shows the "residual risk profile" is extreme, with a chart breaking down specific concerns.

    Reliability is listed three times, with the inherent risk level described as medium or high. The latter is the result of relying on coal plants "that have had reduced investment leading up to their previously expected retirements," it says.

    The document indicates that may increase the risk for "simultaneous forced outages and frequency of forced outages."

    That concern will be mitigated through sustained capital investment to make them as reliable as possible, the chart reads.

    There are also "extreme" risks around financial and regulatory areas. Mitigation for financial concerns will be reliant on the outcome of negotiations over the carbon tax.

    The decision to double down on coal means the province would be in violation of the federal Clean Electricity Regulations, the document reads. Harrison has previously insisted the regulations are "illegal."

    The extreme regulatory risk is because the province would be in violation of an equivalency agreement that exempts it from coal regulations.

    The equivalency agreement expires at the end of 2026 and would mean certain facilities would immediately not be permitted to operate, with restrictions on the remaining coal facilities coming into effect after 2030, according to the document.

    Harrison has previously insisted the Clean Electricity Regulations are "illegal."

    Young said the risk section highlights poor decision-making by the government.

    "All of these risks identified, whether it's reliability, whether it's reputational, whether it's fiscal, there's not a low-risk option among them," she said.

    The document also indicates that because of the province's direction, SaskPower is terminating "previous corporate commitments related to renewable capacity and emissions reductions."

    Young said that means renewable energy projects will be cancelled. 'Massive impacts'


    The current legislative session is set to end this week. Young said the NDP's efforts to highlight the province's poor decision-making are not going to stop.

    "This is going to have massive impacts in every single corner of the province," she said.

    "You cannot run a business without affordable electricity, and we are going to spend this summer making sure that every single community, every single business, every single voter in Saskatchewan knows."

    Young also called for Premier Scott Moe to "find his backbone" and fire Harrison.
    ​
  • chuckChuck
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 12940

    #2
    Holy crap! the price of electricity doubles under Moe's stupid plan? And there are more affordable options than burning coal.
    Gas with renewables are better choice instead of rebuilding coal plants that are already out of date.

    Moe and Harrison look like fools and were never going to release Sask Powers internal analysis that shows that coal is a high risk very expensive option that makes no sense for a few hundred coal jobs ands 13 billion in fuel costs over 25 years.

    "In absolute terms relative to rates in 2025, the average cost of electricity is projected to be 20% higher in 2030 and 95% higher in 2040," it reads.

    Comment

    • rodd
      Member
      • Apr 2017
      • 70

      #3
      By doing nothing, wage increases (unions) cost of trucks, inflation on everything will have power costs doubling by 2040, plus will have worn out power system. NDP wants us to run on fairy dust? WE NEED ELECTRICY! Coal will efficiently produce it until nuclear takes over.

      Comment

      • shtferbrains
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2017
        • 5252

        #4
        What the NDP are talking about is peaker gas plants that are basically a jet engine driving a generator that can fire up and cover when unreliable drop off.
        Obviously not a cheap way to generate power.
        Highest cost gas.
        Like agreeing to have your power bill go up by 50%.
        Cheap gas comes from Combined Cycle where they use the exhaust from the gas turbine to make steam to power a steam turbine.
        Takes 3 to 4 hrs to get into operation.
        Quicker than boilers like older coal or gas plants.

        NDP did a great job of getting days of "news" about the $29 billion but it's all bullshit.
        MSM loved it because it was sensational and got lots of clicks.

        Comment

        • chuckChuck
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2006
          • 12940

          #5
          Moe and Harrison shouldn't be afraid to show us the numbers if they are confident this is the best plan. Sask power calls it a high risk plan.

          They didn't even take into account the industrial carbon tax that Alberta just agreed to. This will drive the cost of coal much higher.

          Rebuilding the coal plants is like rebuilding the steam engines in 1950 when diesel and gas tractors were powering farms.

          CCS gas plants are not the same as peaker plants.

          And every Levelized Cost of Electricity shows wind and solar as the cheapest new electricity capacity.

          On our farm solar cut our electricity costs in half.

          Gas for baseload and backup. Inter connections with Alberta and Manitoba. It can work. Instead Moe is picking coal as the winner. WTF? Even after Sask Power told him it is expensive and high risk!

          Comment

          • shtferbrains
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2017
            • 5252

            #6
            Did you every consider that the leak came from a disgruntled climate crusader at Sask Power who wrote the report?
            I have no doubt there are lots on payroll there that were hired when Trudeau was proclaiming all the net zero bs that never achieved anything.
            They have no roll anymore and nowhere to go.

            Why spread unreliable renewables from China all over when planning to go Nuclear with Cameco right in Saskatoon?
            We can sell clean Power on the interconnect for premium prices when others that went renewable inevitably need it.
            And buy renewable power when the sun is shining for near zero or less.
            Last edited by shtferbrains; May 16, 2026, 16:08.

            Comment

            • fjlip
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2002
              • 9877

              #8
              Excellent picture summarized the INSANITY, just to FIT carnage/brookfield bulls#it! EV kills da planet CC!

              Comment

              • chuckChuck
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2006
                • 12940

                #9
                Grain farmer and Flipper complain about the environmental foot print of EVs but then cheer on the global fossil fuel industry and resource and mining sector which they seem to think is harmless for all other uses? LOL

                You got a laugh at all the knobs who complain about EVs because of mining, energy use and all the impacts of building batteries, but have never said a thing about about the environmental impact of industry untill EVs! WTF are they smokin?

                The fringe thinkers only care about the impact of EVs which is a legitimate concern, but still are much better than ICE vehicles.

                And you wonder why I call it Agrisilly?



                Comment

                • Grain Farmer
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2025
                  • 658

                  #10
                  You are the SILLY!!!
                  it shows no difference
                  So why change what's working??
                  Libtard idea..

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...