• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alberta public health system losing staff, funding, spending on private facilities

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Alberta public health system losing staff, funding, spending on private facilities

    Alberta public health system losing staff, funding as province increases spending on private facilities

    Alanna Smith
    [url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-alberta-public-health-system-losing-staff-funding-as-province/[/url]

    ​Private surgical facilities in Alberta are starving the public system of staff and funding to perform priority procedures, according to a new report that concludes the province has yet to increase surgical capacity or reduce wait times as pledged.

    The 20-page analysis, published Wednesday by the Parkland Institute, showed provincial spending on private surgical facilities increased nearly three-fold to $55.8-million in 2023-24 from $20-million in 2019-20. By comparison, spending in public facilities increased marginally.

    During the same time period, the average cost of outsourced procedures nearly doubled, while wait times jumped for priority procedures, such as cancer surgeries, which are only performed in the public system. In all, roughly 16,500 more procedures were performed over those five years in Alberta, but the increase was “exclusively” in private facilities.

    “For-profit providers are being paid inflated prices to deliver the easiest, most profitable procedures at the expense of our public hospitals,” said Andrew Longhurst, a health policy researcher and the report’s author, in an interview.

    “The consequence to that is what we’re seeing in cancer surgical care. You’re seeing those wait times balloon … and they have very real effects on people’s lives.”

    The Alberta government has been under fire over its deals for chartered surgical facilities (CSFs) since The Globe and Mail reported ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-alberta-ousted-health-services-ceo-amid-probe-into-medical-contracts/[/url]) allegations, now contained in a wrongful dismissal lawsuit, of government interference into health contracts last month. Athana Mentzelopoulos, the former chief executive of Alberta Health Services (AHS), alleges she faced political pressure to sign inflated contracts for CSFs.

    CSFs are privately-owned centres where surgeons perform operations paid for by the public health care system. Two private facilities at the centre of Ms. Mentzelopoulos’s allegations were negotiating rates more than double what a competitor was charged, The Globe previously revealed ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-alberta-surgical-companies-with-contracts-under-scrutiny-linked-to/[/url]) after obtaining an AHS pricing document. The price comparison also showed that the proposed fees surpassed what it cost AHS to perform the same surgeries.

    The United Conservative government has argued that private facilities add capacity and can help reduce wait times. Critics say CSFs can play a role in surgical care but run the risk of scraping crucial resources, such as anesthesiologists, from the public system.

    Mr. Longhurst noted in his report that the public and private facilities are pulling from the same limited staffing pool. He said most public operating rooms in Alberta are not currently funded and staffed to perform surgeries during evenings or weekends.

    “Paying for-profit providers a premium rate simply diverts staff from hospitals to the for-profit sector,” he said.
    More stories below advertisement


















    Health Minister Adriana LaGrange, in a statement on Wednesday, dismissed the report.

    “The use of chartered surgical facilities has played a key role in reducing wait times and improving patient care, yet these successes are often dismissed or downplayed in favor of an ideological stance that does not reflect the actual progress we’ve made,” she said.

    The UCP government, under former premier Jason Kenney, announced the Alberta Surgical Initiative (ASI) in December, 2019. The aim was to meet wait-time targets and fund an additional 80,000 surgeries over four years by expanding contracts with private facilities. The UCP said it wanted independent providers to perform 30 per cent of all procedures by 2023, double that of 2019.

    That goal has not been reached. About 22 per cent of all surgeries performed in Alberta last year were scheduled in CSFs, according to government data. The provincial dashboard also shows that 42.5 per cent of patients are waiting for surgeries outside of the recommended target, as of February.

    Mr. Longhurst’s report shows median wait times for nine of 11 priority procedures tracked by the Canadian Institute for Health Information have increased since ASI was introduced. Lung cancer patients in 2023 waited on average 31 days for surgery, up from 21 in 2019. Over the same period, wait times for breast cancer surgery rose to 22 days from 17.

    There were also longer wait times for prostate, bladder and colorectal cancer surgeries. Cancer surgeries are performed exclusively in public hospitals.

    Cataract and hip surgeries – both of which are partly outsourced to CSFs – were the only two procedures that saw median wait times decrease, by 31 per cent and 1 per cent. Knee replacements, one of the main procedures outsourced to private facilities, saw a 27-per-cent increase in wait times.

    The report also highlights that government spending on private facilities outpaced funding for public operating rooms.

    “Public hospitals have been put in the untenable position of serving a growing and aging population with fewer resources,” the report says. “While the Alberta government seems committed to deepening the role of investors in Alberta’s health system, this approach is proving costly for both the government and patients.”

    #2
    Alberta expands use of private surgical centres in bid to shorten procedure wait-lists
    Matthew Scace

    [url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-alberta-private-surgical-centres-danielle-smith-wait-lists/[/url]


    Alberta Premier Danielle Smith ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/danielle-smith/[/url]) is expanding the province’s use of private surgical centres to perform thousands of procedures, with the goal of increasing operating-room capacity and shortening wait-lists.

    Ms. Smith announced Friday her government’s plan to improve access to acute care, which will include constructing three buildings, each adjoined to hospitals in Calgary and Edmonton. Together, the buildings will hold more than 1,000 new hospital beds. They will be added to Grey Nuns and Misericordia Community hospitals in Edmonton and South Health Campus hospital in Calgary.

    Critics said the announcement was an example of the government doubling down on private surgeries, and that it doesn’t address a shortage of health care workers in Alberta ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/[/url]).

    Ms. Smith’s government has been under fire since early this year over deals for private surgical facilities, when The Globe and Mail first reported allegations – now contained in a wrongful dismissal lawsuit – of government interference into health contracts. The former chief executive of Alberta Health Services, Athana Mentzelopoulos, alleges she faced political pressure to sign inflated contracts for certain facilities. The government alleges she was fired for incompetence.

    None of the allegations have been tested in court.

    Last month, an independent review by retired Manitoba judge Raymond Wyant found AHS didn’t follow its own policies for opening a private surgical clinic in Edmonton. Though Mr. Wyant did not find evidence of political interference, he did not interview elected officials in his investigation and said his conclusions came with limitations, partly because he didn’t have the power to subpoena or hear testimony under oath.

    Ms. Smith did not say which private surgical centres, formally known as chartered surgical facilities, will be contracted as part of the plan. CSFs are privately owned facilities where surgeons perform operations that are paid for by the public health care system.

    CSFs have increased the number of surgeries they can perform annually since 2019, Ms. Smith told reporters Friday, up to 65,000 surgeries per year from 40,000.

    “When we went out and asked not only our public hospital providers, but also surgical centres, ‘Do you have room to do more?’ Their answer was overwhelmingly yes,” she said.

    Ms. Smith’s government has argued private facilities add capacity and can help reduce wait times, and critics say while they can play a role in surgical care, they risk pulling resources away from the public system. A report published in March by the Parkland Institute found private surgical facilities in Alberta were starving the public system of staff and funding ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-alberta-public-health-system-losing-staff-funding-as-province/[/url]) to perform priority procedures.

    As of September, there were more than 83,000 Albertans waiting for surgeries – the highest number recorded since January, 2022, according to the Alberta Surgical Initiative dashboard. That number has been rising steadily since April, 2023, when more than 71,500 residents were waiting for surgery.

    The province did not say how it intends to staff the new spaces. Matt Jones, Alberta’s Minister of Hospital and Surgical Health Services, said the province has recruited more than 1,000 registered and licensed nurses and 600 new physicians over the past year.

    “I think the value proposition here is significant,” Mr. Jones said. He also foreshadowed two “very significant” health care commitments to be announced before the end of November. Twelve new psychiatric beds were included in Friday’s announcement.

    The province said the plan to increase access to acute care is expected to cost $82.5-million, but did not provide a breakdown of the costs, nor how much it will need to spend to staff the new spaces. It also did not outline a timeline for the plan’s rollout.

    Sarah Hoffman, an Opposition health critic from the Alberta NDP, criticized the government for expanding on a strategy “that’s already under all these investigations and allegations.”

    “I think having somebody to blame for things not being good enough in public health care, and a road map to be able to further privatization is her goal,” Ms. Hoffman said of Ms. Smith.

    Friends of Medicare, a public health care advocacy group, in a statement said the announcement was “cover” for the province to spend more on private surgical contracts.


    Comment


      #3
      So where is the respectful debate on this subject? I raise an important issue and all we get is crickets? Typical!

      Comment


        #4
        We know the demographics of the baby boom are the real cause of long wait times for elective surgery.

        Paul Kershaw explained it well:

        "I began sharing the arithmetic in my last column ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/article-how-younger-canadians-end-up-paying-more-for-boomers-medical-care/[/url]). Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information ([url]https://www.cihi.ca/en/national-health-expenditure-trends[/url]) reveal that Canadians under 50 on average use about $3,000 annually in publicly funded medical care. By the early 70s, average costs exceed $10,000. By age 90, they approach $37,000. Altogether, a typical senior roughly consumes more care than four Canadians under 50 combined.

        Knowing this ratio lets us compare medical demand when boomers were young versus today, accounting for both population growth and aging. The idea is simple: count how many under-50s it would take to match the medical spending generated by the population’s age distribution in any given year.

        In 1976, Canada’s 23.5 million people, with only 9 per cent over 64, generated the demand of 32.2 million under-50 patients. By 2024, the country’s headcount increased to 41.3 million. If the senior share had stayed at 9 per cent, demand would equal 56.7 million under-50 equivalents.

        But with nearly one in five Canadians now over 64, demand has climbed to 75.6 million. Aging added the equivalent of 18.9 million more younger patients, over and above population growth.

        Run these age-adjusted pressures through provincial budgets, and the result is stark. Holding today’s spending patterns constant but swapping in the 1976 age distribution, most provinces would move from deficit to surplus. With Ontario’s aging-related medical costs now exceeding $22 billion annually, that would be enough to flip $15-billion in red ink into $8-billion in the black."

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          So where is the respectful debate on this subject? I raise an important issue and all we get is crickets? Typical!
          Lifelong friend and neighbour has a really bad knee. Sees his family doc a couple months ago. Gets an appointment with an orthopaedic surgeon last week. Certainly agrees he needs a knee replacement. On the list he goes. Doctor says it will be about 2 years. My sister has an arthritic hip, she lives in Australia. Started seeing a surgeon last year. She decides this year to go ahead with a hip replacement, she got the surgery a couple months after she decided to do it. The difference? In Australia you can buy health insurance essentially from the government that gives you access to an expedited level of health care. She hasn’t said what the timeline would have been without this. But she is very thankful she has lived the last 25 years in Australia.. I am guessing similar demographics related to baby boomers.

          One thing not discussed is the influence of increased immigration under Justin Trudeau pressuring the health systems across Canada. Regardless of what Chuck2 focuses on Alberta isn’t the only province with problems.

          Comment


            #6
            Alberta is the province that is aggressively promoting for profit private health care.

            Where does the profit come from Hamloc? Don't run away!

            It will come from overcharging like the kind that was brought to light by the resignation of Athana Mentzelopoulos CEO of AHS who said that the Danny Smith government was corruptly signing more expensive contracts with private for profit healthcare who had close connections to the UCP and Smiths government!

            There is evidence of corruption and conflicts of interest that will lead to higher cost from for profit healthcare and no evidence that wait times will decrease.

            In fact there is evidence that wait times and outcomes for non elective surgeries will be negative.


            Comment


              #7
              Nice to hear you are ignored!

              Comment


                #8
                2 tiered healthcare works around the world, why not in Canada. European countries have used it for years. In US, cash is king. 130000 operation for a friend, asked if he should buy health care insurance, hospital asked if he could raise 20,000, when he said he could they said they preferred that. He is now fixed up and home.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by RD414 View Post
                  2 tiered healthcare works around the world, why not in Canada. European countries have used it for years. In US, cash is king. 130000 operation for a friend, asked if he should buy health care insurance, hospital asked if he could raise 20,000, when he said he could they said they preferred that. He is now fixed up and home.
                  A friend of mine took his wife to the Mayo clinic. Appointments for 5 days. Up to 2 hrs at a time, no rushing, ask as many questions as you want. 7 vials of blood for blood work and a CT scan. $10,000 cdn. They think they have an answer to her problems that have plagued her for 3 yrs.

                  Best $10k he ever spent.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The well off who can afford it have no problem with 2 tiered healthcare?

                    What a surprise! LOL

                    But what about the other 95% of the public?

                    And most of the healthcare spending goes to seniors as they age and the Mayo clinic doesn't help much with aging issues and long term care costs.

                    So you better rethink your idea that 2 tiered healthcare will be better for everyone!

                    Because it won't.

                    Where does the profit in providing quality health care to seniors come from?



                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...