Moe says BC coast is Canada's Coast!

[chuckChuck]

You gotta laugh at Moe the guy who fights the perceived over reach of the Federal government when it comes to the carbon emissions and climate policy that know no borders which he says are a provincial responsibility, but when it come to the BC coast he said in an obvious about face, that it's Canada's coast and responsibility?

Scotty can't have it both ways! You are either for more provincial autonomy or you are not.

Eby said all the billions of investments he has going are at risk if they try to ram through another imaginary oil pipeline and piss of first nations and the province that doesn't want oil spills on the north coast. LNG is more acceptable.

At least wait for an actual solid pipeline business case from the private sector to appear. Instead of the distracting political theater of Danny Smith!

And Saskatchewan won't even use a new pipeline to the north coast!

Go figure!

[sumdumguy]

American tankers go up and down the BC coast several times a day but heaven forbid a Canadian tanker should go there.

[GALAXIE500]

EBY is an NDP premier who is being told/paid to not give a rats arse about the betterment of Canada! It is time to put some of these projects through for the betterment of the entire country and get the Liberal/NDP mindset out of the conversation.

10 years of Trudeau/liberal policies have put a stranglehold on this country and ruined our reputation globally. Sorry that I had to give you a reality check there Chuck.

Really not sure why you don't get it , but maybe one day you will.

[sumdumguy]

Next time Sask Power wants to put an obstructive line across my field, I’ll disallow, see how far I get with that. Eby, wake-up!

[wmoebis]

American tankers go up and down the BC coast several times a day but heaven forbid a Canadian tanker should go there.

And yet CPC gave the ports themselves to Saudi Gov't even tho there were Canadians that wanted in on them. What about the USA and other countries that also own ports on both coasts.

[LEP]

And yet CPC gave the ports themselves to Saudi Gov't even tho there were Canadians that wanted in on them. What about the USA and other countries that also own ports on both coasts.

No ports are owned by Saudi Arabia. DP World operates some terminals at some Canadian ports. They are from UAE. There are several terminals at every port.

[wmoebis]

G3 owns port on north shore of Burrard Inlet and ports in East they got from Bunge deal. G3 major owner is Saudi Gov't.

[LEP]

Canada has 550 port facilities in Canada according to the Government of Canada website. What G3 owns are port facilities. That are located beside other port facilities.

[chuckChuck]

Loaded US tankers don't go in the "exclusion zone" or dock at any ports on the north coast. They go well west of it to reduce the chance of serious spill.

They don't have enough oil to fill another pipeline and one energy economist estimates that the pipeline and ramping up oil production will take $130 billion and at least 10 years.

But Danny Smith says it all has to be decided in a few weeks? LOL

She is just using more political theater and sowing more division with her my way or the highway threats to distract from her terrible mismanagement of education healthcare corruption at the highest level.

And separation will make it harder to build a pipeline through the rest of Canada to BC ports!

[shtferbrains]

Loaded US tankers don't go in the "exclusion zone" or dock at any ports on the north coast. They go well west of it to reduce the chance of serious

Your right on this Chuck.
As you point out, even if tankers go further west as the super tankers that travel from Valdez to Pugget Sound just south of Vancouver, they can't dock on the north coast.
So it is much more than a ban on tankers traveling the inside passage. It's a ban on loading tankers on the north BC coast no matter if they head straight out to sea toward Asia like they do when they load off the TMX near Vancouver.

How does that make sense?