• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Global energy investment to reach record US$3.3-trillion, IEA says

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Global energy investment to reach record US$3.3-trillion, IEA says


    [/URL]
    Global energy investment is leaning toward clean sources of power, such as these windmills near Fort Macleod, Alta., a new IEA report says.Todd Korol/Reuters

    [url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-global-energy-investment-to-reach-record-us33-trillion/[/url]

    Global energy ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/energy/[/url]) investment is set to increase to a record US$3.3-trillion this year, with clean technologies attracting twice as much capital as fossil fuels, according to a new report.

    Forecasts in the 2025 World Energy Investment report, released Thursday by the International Energy Agency ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/international-energy-agency/[/url]), underscore how global investment trends are leaning toward clean energy ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/renewable-energy/[/url]), even at a time of geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainties.

    Fatih Birol, executive director of the IEA, said the fact clean energy will amount to two-thirds of investment this year is driven by a significant drop in the cost of many green technologies, combined with countries seeing them as a key part of their energy security strategies.

    “In Canada, in the U.S., we still need oil and gas ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/oil-and-gas/[/url]). We will need them for years to come. But we also need nuclear power. We need wind, we need solar. We need all these technologies for a secure energy system,” Dr. Birol said in an interview from Paris ahead of the report’s release.


    Lower oil prices and demand expectations will result in a 6-per-cent fall in upstream oil investment in 2025 – the first year-on-year decline since the COVID-19 slump in 2020 and the largest since 2016, the report says.

    Canada’s canola farmers stand to gain from U.S. tax breaks for clean fuel ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/economy/article-canadas-canola-farmers-stand-to-gain-from-us-tax-breaks-for-clean-fuel/[/url])

    Global refinery investment in 2025 is set to fall to its lowest level in 10 years.

    The IEA said in the report it initially expected oil and gas spending to be flat in 2025, based on company announcements, but investment sentiment has become more downbeat as oil prices come under pressure.

    The report projects overall investment in oil and gas production this year to total just under US$570-billion.

    By contrast, the global liquefied natural gas market is set to experience its largest-ever capacity growth between 2026 and 2028, with investment in new LNG facilities boosted by projects preparing to come online in the United States, Qatar, Canada and elsewhere.

    Canada is a cornerstone of the global energy market, Dr. Birol said, and he applauded the country’s efforts reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in the oil and gas sector.

    Report finds Alberta’s restrictive renewables policies dampened investment ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-alberta-restrictive-renewables-policies-dampened-investment/[/url])

    But if oil and gas are to remain a significant part of the global energy mix, fossil fuel companies will need to continue investing in those emissions-reducing technologies, he said.

    “There is an excellent track record for methane emissions, for example, in Canada. And I hope that we see similar trends in the carbon emissions thanks to carbon capture and storage,” he said.

    Per-barrel emissions from Alberta’s oil sands dropped by 26 per cent between 2012 and 2023, according to the most recent Oil Sands Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity Analysis, released Wednesday. That’s a 4-per-cent improvement over 2022.

    Alberta’s natural gas production and processing emissions have declined by 24 per cent since 2015, and methane emissions by 52 per cent since 2014, according to the analysis.

    On the electricity front, never before has there been such massive growth in global demand, Dr. Birol said. Between now and 2030, demand will increase as much as the current consumption in the U.S. and China ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/china/[/url]) combined.

    Editorial: Free the market for renewable energy in Alberta ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-renewable-energy-alberta-oil-gas-danielle-smith/[/url])

    The cost of utility-scale batteries has fallen by two-thirds over the past decade, and global battery investment is approaching the level of gas-fired power generation investment, the report notes.

    But investment in electricity grids, now at US$400-billion per year, is failing to keep pace with overall spending on generation and electrification.

    As demand for energy continues to grow, more countries are embracing homegrown energy sources, Dr. Birol said.

    Take nuclear, for example. Capital flows to the sector have increased by 50 per cent over the past five years and are on track to reach around US$75-billion in 2025, according to the report.

    Dr. Birol attributes that growth to Russia’s war against Ukraine ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/ukraine/[/url]), which “reminded Europeans how important it is to increase domestic electricity generation.”

    In Europe, countries are extending the lifetime of existing nuclear power plants and building new ones. There is also huge interest in small modular reactors, including in Canada ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-federal-regulator-approves-canadas-first-small-modular-reactor/[/url]).

    “I think this is good news for the world, both in terms of energy security, but also addressing our climate challenges,” Dr. Birol said.
    ?
    Last edited by chuckChuck; Jun 5, 2025, 08:05.

    #2
    Global energy ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/topics/energy/[/url]) investment is set to increase to a record US$3.3-trillion this year, with clean technologies attracting twice as much capital as fossil fuels, according to a new report.
    ?

    Comment


      #3
      Congratulations Chuck, you just posted yet another article contradicting your ridiculous claim that renewables are the cheapest energy.

      Wind and solar now provide 3% of global energy.

      Fossil fuels still provide 81%.

      So for half as much investment we get 27 times more energy

      It only makes wind and solar 54 times more expensive than fossil fuels. Perhaps you should repeat your mantra about cheapest generation a few more times..

      Comment


        #4
        Huh? Nuclear, hydro and other clean investments, technology and infrastructure are in that estimate. And those are investments are for 2025, so its projects that are not built yet let alone generating. Silly you!

        So you should come up with some different math than taking current production divided by the cost of investments in 2025. That's really a stupid claim and really bad thinking!

        Par for the course from Absurd 5!

        Comment


          #5
          So now nuclear is renewable? How fast is the uranium renewing itself?

          Let's use your numbers. Hydro, nuclear and all other renewables 16.9% of global primary energy production. All other renewables of course includes all of the cow dung being burnt.

          Using those numbers, fossil fuels only produce five times more primary energy than all of the others combined. For half the cost. Making fossil fuels only 10 times less expensive.

          Comment


            #6
            This week John Ivison interviews a senior advisor from the Business council of Canada. Very interesting video about where and what Carney should be going with legislation and investment. Worth the watch.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
              So now nuclear is renewable? How fast is the uranium renewing itself?

              Let's use your numbers. Hydro, nuclear and all other renewables 16.9% of global primary energy production. All other renewables of course includes all of the cow dung being burnt.

              Using those numbers, fossil fuels only produce five times more primary energy than all of the others combined. For half the cost. Making fossil fuels only 10 times less expensive.
              Nuclear is not a carbon emitting source of energy. And nobody is arguing that fossil fuels are not still producing most of the worlds energy.

              And since your earlier post was really effing stupid math nobody is interested or believes any of your lame attempts at math.

              Investments in energy sources and clean energy technology other than fossil fuels are currently significantly larger than fossil fuel investment according to IEA.

              And poor Absurd 5 will make all kinds of absurd arguments that don't change that fact one bit!

              Comment


                #8
                Yes. You keep repeating the point that renewable energy costs a lot more. And you've been telling us that for years now. And for years, fossil fuels have continued to produce multiple times more energy for a fraction if the cost.

                On your pretend farm, if the cost of growing a crop that provides 16.9% of your revenue was "significantly larger" than the cost to grow the crop that provides 81% of your revenue, year after year after year, how long would you be in pretend business?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                  Nuclear is not a carbon emitting source of energy.
                  goal post moved yet again.
                  Remember all the anti-nuclear posts you've made?
                  Now suddenly it's not about the environment, or cost, or being renewable or being green, just as long as it's not fossil fuels.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post


                    And since your earlier post was really effing stupid math nobody is interested or believes any of your lame attempts at math.
                    Of course. Who needs math when you have blind ideology and religious dogmatic belief.
                    That paragraph really sums up Chuck Chuck economics in one sentence.

                    That post was just a gold mine of material for ridiculing you. Thank you for your contribution.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...