• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

As construction of first small modular reactor looms, buyers wait for the final tally

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shtferbrains
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2017
    • 5301

    #31
    Chuck only looks at renewables.

    The 55% coal goes unnoticed
    Last edited by shtferbrains; Jan 5, 2025, 16:33.

    Comment

    • sumdumguy
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 12046

      #32
      Chuck is as dense as a fence post.

      Comment

      • chuckChuck
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2006
        • 13075

        #33
        But the flat earthers still can't figure out that with electrical generation you can have all types including renewables during the transition!

        Over 60% of Canada's electricity is already renewable hydro. Quebec and Manitoba lead the way with the lowest cost electricity in the country by far because of renewable hydro.

        In Alberta they don't want any more low cost wind and solar because then they can sell more gas.

        Smith is is not following free market economics, she wants to pick winners and losers and sell more gas. Alberta is closed for billions in business investment that dosen't fit her plan!






        Last edited by chuckChuck; Jan 6, 2025, 08:38.

        Comment

        • chuckChuck
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2006
          • 13075

          #35
          Who said anything about not needing base load?

          Apparently Texas and North Dakota have figured it out and still have a lot of renewables and backup!

          Comment

          • fjlip
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2002
            • 9887

            #36
            So lets have two systems, double triple the costs when ONE would do!


            Idiot

            Comment

            • chuckChuck
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2006
              • 13075

              #37
              So are Quebec, Manitoba, North Dakota, and Texas rates double or triple? Nope!

              Renewables prices are based on zero fuel costs. A big advantage over fossil fuels.

              Comment

              • Hamloc
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2014
                • 3994

                #38
                Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                So are Quebec, Manitoba, North Dakota, and Texas rates double or triple? Nope!

                Renewables prices are based on zero fuel costs. A big advantage over fossil fuels.
                Comparing abundant hydro resources in Quebec and Manitoba to solar and wind is ridiculous. Certainly hydro in those two provinces have proven to be affordable. Hydro is a dependable source of base load power, wind and solar are far from it.

                Comment

                • shtferbrains
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2017
                  • 5301

                  #39
                  There is no point in debating a flat earther.
                  He is not open to any facts.

                  The wind and sun are free.
                  Can't beat free.

                  Comment

                  • blackpowder
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 9372

                    #40
                    CYA when a socialist says free.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...