Cheap wind power ????

[furrowtickler]

Sorry Chuck the gig is up
your constant pouring over oil companies and subsidies pales in comparison

[furrowtickler]

And whine about how oil companies get rich constantly but I bet you have not said a word about this ..

[furrowtickler]

Renewables , Cheapest form of energy….. lol

[Hamloc]

Thanks for the truth Furrow. Now of course Chuck2 will post many cut and pastes telling how Wind is one of the cheapest forms of electricity generation. What I can’t figure out is the left always goes on about the problem with disinformation. It has nothing to do with disinformation, but it has a lot to do with left trying to suppress anything that disagrees with their partisan load of crap!!!

[goalieguy847]

Proof of the suppression?
oh . Right. RFK speech the other day when cnn cuts his feed when he talks about media suppression.

Incredible.

[chuckChuck]

Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario are all installing more wind.

Doug Ford has changed his tune on renewables. Why?

Because they are one of the most economical options that brings new capacity relatively quickly.

North Dakota and Texas both have considerable onshore wind generation.

And New York is just one example out of many. An offshore example.

And Lazards 2024 LCOE shows onshore wind from $27-$73 per MWh in the US. Offshore $74-$139 MWh.

[url]https://www.lazard.com/media/xemfey0k/lazards-lcoeplus-june-2024-_vf.pdf[/url]

[shtferbrains]

And Lazards 2024 LCOE shows onshore wind from $27-$73 per MWh in the US. Offshore $74-$139 MWh.

[url]https://www.lazard.com/media/xemfey0k/lazards-lcoeplus-june-2024-_vf.pdf[/url]

Did you post that just to confirm what we have been trying to teach you about lazard?

Totally irrelevant?

[chuckChuck]

Irrelevant just like you and Agrisilly when it comes to utilities and governments making energy decisions!

[Hamloc]

Proof of the suppression?
oh . Right. RFK speech the other day when cnn cuts his feed when he talks about media suppression.

Incredible.

Actually I look closer to home. Justin Trudeau talks a lot about disinformation. Unfortunately looking at an issue through what he considers the wrong partisan lens is disinformation. If I am an oil company and I have reduced my GHG emissions I can no longer promote that because he considers that disinformation. I am sure he would consider what Furrow posted about how expensive the electricity will be from these Wind Turbines to be misinformation. Unfortunately we all look at the source now and believe or discount the information based on our own political bias. The move away from practical centrist governance in either direction has nasty side affects. What I meant to say is that moving away from governing for the benefit of all Canadians to governing for only certain regions and special interests divides and in the end creates resentment and failure.

[chuckChuck]

Hamloc. Oil companies can no longer promote green claims that are not true. If they are backed up by evidence, no restrictions.

Big tobacco did everything they could to deny the harm of tobacco. Big oil has used some of the same techniques to spread disinformation.