World’s top climate scientists expect global heating to blast past 1.5C target

[jazz]

You can see where the tides and waves stop, that’s where the green starts, I guess it doesn’t fit chuckroach’s propaganda.

Sure is a lot more people living on that sand bar in the past 100 yrs. For people who watch the sea every day, thye dont seem too concerned. Sort of the same as chucks hero Gates and Obama who have multiple seas side homes.

[furrowtickler]

Ohhh chuck give up already and get to work

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Ohhh chuck give up already and get to work

What if he is already at work? Maybe this is his work?
Definitely not a results based compensation package.

[furrowtickler]

Liberals pay well to spread misinformation

[jazz]

Isnt that a strange coincidence. A solar storm, pink sky aurora, GPS and cell coverage knocked for a loop and then a few dozen spontaneous fires kick off all located in the northern oil areas in Ab and BC.

Sounds like another maui attack.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Good job A5 you are starting to understand climate vs weather! 30 years equals climate.

And that still doesn't change the remarkable last 5 years on the prairies that have been getting drier which contradicts your arm chair opinion that we are getting wetter.

You just finished lecturing me that climate is measured over 30 years.
Then you contradict yourself by claiming once again that five dry years in the near desert palliser triangle is evidence of climate change.

Have you ever considered that perhaps debating wasn't the best career choice for someone with your lack of skill set?

[chuckChuck]

I never said that 5 years is the measure of climate. Did I?

But it doesn't matter how long or how short of time span you look at, you deny that CO2 and other greenhouse gases cause climate change.

And in fact you say more CO2 is going to be good for us?

So which scientific organization is recommending we increase CO2 emissions to make the world a better place?

We are waiting A5! If you so sure you are right there must be some science to back you up? Right?

[Hamloc]

I never said that 5 years is the measure of climate. Did I?

But it doesn't matter how long or how short of time span you look at, you deny that CO2 and other greenhouse gases cause climate change.

And in fact you say more CO2 is going to be good for us?

So which scientific organization is recommending we increase CO2 emissions to make the world a better place?

We are waiting A5! If you so sure you are right there must be some science to back you up? Right?

I will be honest, I glanced at the original post and I haven’t read any responses. Time is short this time of year. My only thought is that if you are a true believer you must have always expected the average temperature increase to surpass 1.5 degrees over pre industrial levels(1850, as earth exited the little ice age). Let’s be realistic, countries like China and India(most populous countries on earth) are not cutting back emissions, in fact their emissions are increasing as they increase coal consumption year over year. Daily consumption worldwide of oil is in the 100 million barrels a day range. Governments spending and taxing their populous into lower standards of living won’t change this trajectory. Plan for the future, spend and research on adaptation!!

[chuckChuck]

The cost of doing nothing will be much higher that will be paid for by future generations. Out of control climate change is not an option. And that's where we are headed unless we reduce carbon emissions. Its a long transition.

[jazz]

Daily consumption worldwide of oil is in the 100 million barrels a day range. Governments spending and taxing their populous into lower standards of living won’t change this trajectory. Plan for the future, spend and research on adaptation!!

Wait until chuck finds out how much more oil the world will use once AI and automation take hold.