• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Great article on wind and solar

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Great article on wind and solar

    Financial Post: “Bjorn Lomborg: Why solar and Wind power aren’t winning.”

    From the article: “It is often reported that emerging industrial powers like China, India, Indonesia and Bangladesh are getting more power from solar and wind. But these countries get much more additional power from coal. Last year China got more additional power from coal than it did from solar and wind. India got three times more electricity from coal than from green energy sources. Bangladesh 13 times more and Indonesia an astonishing 90 times more. If solar and wind really were cheaper, why would these countries not use them? Because reliability matters.”

    More: “A new study shows that to achieve 100 per cent solar or wind electricity with sufficient backup, the U.S. would need to be able to store 3 months worth of electricity every year. It currently has seven minutes worth of battery storage. The required batteries would cost the U.S. five times of its current GDP. And it would have to replace them all when they expired after just 15 years.”

    #2
    Wind and solar are capable of supplying significant amounts of electricity. Great Britain, Denmark, and Germany already have large amounts of renewable generation.

    In Alberta the amount is already about 20%.

    Danny Smith and her petro partners are so worried about ever increasing amounts of renewable electricity she had to slow it down with a fake claim it was putting good farmland at risk. Which is a bold faced lie.

    The Alberta Utilities Commission clearly said the loss of land to renewables is very low when compared to oil and gas and industrial and urban development. And the environmental risk also very low compared to oil and gas.

    The UCP opposed to the gate keepers wants to pick and choose winners in the freemarket? Now that is called being a gatekeeper! LOL

    Now she is opposed to well insulated houses that use less energy! Lets bring back single pane windows and stop insulating just so she can sell more natural gas?

    The sewage runs deep in the UCP!


    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
      Wind and solar are capable of supplying significant amounts of electricity. Great Britain, Denmark, and Germany already have large amounts of renewable generation.

      In Alberta the amount is already about 20%.

      Danny Smith and her petro partners are so worried about ever increasing amounts of renewable electricity she had to slow it down with a fake claim it was putting good farmland at risk. Which is a bold faced lie.

      The Alberta Utilities Commission clearly said the loss of land to renewables is very low when compared to oil and gas and industrial and urban development. And the environmental risk also very low compared to oil and gas.

      The UCP opposed to the gate keepers wants to pick and choose winners in the freemarket? Now that is called being a gatekeeper! LOL

      Now she is opposed to well insulated houses that use less energy! Lets bring back single pane windows and stop insulating just so she can sell more natural gas?

      The sewage runs deep in the UCP!

      It is as if you are taking part in a completely different conversation, which the rest of us aren't privileged to reading. You post responses that have almost nothing to do with the original posts. Are these replies to the voices in your head, and you can't differentiate between the real world and your internal hallucinations?

      Comment


        #4
        I just gave you several examples of where renewables are strong in response to the Financial Post: “Bjorn Lomborg: Why solar and Wind power aren’t winning.”

        And according to the IEA wind and solar are winning as the lowest cost new generation capacity in many countries.

        Its a long transition so what do you expect in a few years?

        Comment


          #5
          People were signing contracts that no oil company has gotten away with for half a century.
          Where's your outrage now?

          Comment


            #6
            Great Britain, Germany and Denmark have some of the highest electricity rates in the world .

            Comment


              #7
              I agree that for better or worse, it will be a long transition. Civilizations rise and fall on access to affordable energy. It will take an as yet unseen development to provide this differently.
              As for oil itself. The great proportion of which is used for other than personal transportation. A lot of talk about oils' demise. None about a replacement.
              Current replacement concepts aren't even close to removal strategies. Oil demand with us for a few generations yet.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
                Great Britain, Germany and Denmark have some of the highest electricity rates in the world .
                Just like Alberta relative to other Provinces thanks to deregulation and market manipulation!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                  Just like Alberta relative to other Provinces thanks to deregulation and market manipulation!
                  Actually, similar to the extent that higher inclusion rates of solar and wind have increased electricity prices but from a regulation standpoint, Great Britain, Germany and Denmark would have regulated power rates which Alberta does not. Still the fact remains adding solar and wind to the electrical production mix does not lower the cost of electricity.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Related question. We drove through southern AB yesterday. Went past one solar farm mid morning and all the panels were facing east. They appeared to be long rows, not individual panels that could easily rotate.
                    Are these able to track the sun and rotate?
                    Are some farms setting up to maximize production during the morning or evenings to take advantage of higher electricity prices as the midday glut gets worse?
                    This was south east of Lethbridge.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I have posted in the past that in real world application, stand alone solar requires 3 months of energy storage. This is based on information from the people installing the systems.
                      Here is a peer reviewed journal article coming to the same conclusion.

                      Moving away from fossil fuels is essential for a sustainable future. Carrying out this transition without reversing the improvements in the quality of life is the ultimate challenge. While minimizing the anticipated impacts of climate change is the primary driver of decarbonization, the inevitable exhaustion of fossil energy sources should provide just as strong or perhaps even stronger incentives. The vast majority of publications outlining the pathways to “net-zero carbon emission” fall short from leading to a truly “fossil fuel-free” future without falling back to some level of dependence on fossil fuels with carbon capture and sequestration. While carbon capture and sequestration might be a necessary step toward decarbonization, such intermediate goals might turn into a dead end without defining the end point. The main obstacle to wider adoption of renewable energy resources is their inherent intermittency. Solar and wind are, by far, the most abundant renewable energy sources that are expected to take the lion share in transitioning to a sustainable future. Intermittency arises at multiple levels. The most recognized are the short-term (minute-by-minute, hourly, or diurnal) variations that should be the easiest to address. Less frequently realized are the seasonal and inter-annual variabilities. Seasonality poses far greater challenges than minute-by-minute or hourly variations because they lead to the absence of energy resources for prolonged periods of time. Our int...


                      This works out to 5 times the entire US annual GDP. Needing replaced every 15 years.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Renewables are already generating large amounts of electricity in many countries that contradicts the assumption that they can't be relied on to significantly reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels.

                        About 80% of Canada's electricity is already from non emitting sources with renewable hydro, wind, solar, and nuclear.

                        Renewables are growing at a rapid pace in many parts the world because they are the lowest cost source of new generation capacity.

                        Storage will be part of the solution. Transalta recently cancelled plans for a large storage project, but Danny the gatekeeper put up road blocks to scare away more investment so that Alberta can burn more gas.

                        Danny and the UCP don't like competition from lower cost renewables. So she makes up bogus arguments that are dismissed by the Alberta Utilities Commission!


                        [url]https://calgaryherald.com/business/energy/alberta-commission-renewables-little-threat-agriculture-environment[/url]

                        Renewables pose little threat to agriculture, environment: report
                        The Alberta Utilities Commission found renewable power is much less of a threat to the province's farmland than other forms of energy development and urban spread.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          How about we replace the coal we are using with the wood pellets we send to Britain.
                          Science says it's a renewable and carbon neutral.
                          We already have the coal plant just change them over to a proven renewable energy source.
                          We could easily make our 2030 targets and Alberta Saskatchewan could be the cleanest places on earth.

                          How about it Chuck?
                          It's all ready to go!
                          Sound Science.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Sounds good! I have 600+ acres of dead and dying climax Boreal forest that could be used. Before it goes up in smoke preferably.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                              Renewables are already generating large amounts of electricity in many countries that contradicts the assumption that they can't be relied on to significantly reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels.

                              About 80% of Canada's electricity is already from non emitting sources with renewable hydro, wind, solar, and nuclear.

                              Renewables are growing at a rapid pace in many parts the world because they are the lowest cost source of new generation capacity.

                              Storage will be part of the solution. Transalta recently cancelled plans for a large storage project, but Danny the gatekeeper put up road blocks to scare away more investment so that Alberta can burn more gas.

                              Danny and the UCP don't like competition from lower cost renewables. So she makes up bogus arguments that are dismissed by the Alberta Utilities Commission!


                              [url]https://calgaryherald.com/business/energy/alberta-commission-renewables-little-threat-agriculture-environment[/url]

                              Renewables pose little threat to agriculture, environment: report
                              The Alberta Utilities Commission found renewable power is much less of a threat to the province's farmland than other forms of energy development and urban spread.
                              Perhaps if you were to share the voices in your head with the rest of us, we would understand where these posts come from.

                              I shared information from a credible source about the amount of storage required for the renewable revolution.
                              And in response, you ramble on about Danny, Urban sprawl, farmland, natural gas, you repeat the words low cost twice, completely contradicting the information in the paper I posted. Then you managed to make one mention of storage has been part of the solution, again, contradicting the paper provided above.
                              The only explanation I can come up with for your unrelated responses is that you are responding to the demons in your head, and you are unable to differentiate between those voices and reality.
                              Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; May 5, 2024, 15:59.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...