• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Danielle Smith’s attack on clean power is an attack on free enterprise

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Danielle Smith’s attack on clean power is an attack on free enterprise

    opinion Danielle Smith’s attack on clean power is an attack on free enterprise

    [url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-danielle-smiths-attack-on-clean-power-is-an-attack-on-free-enterprise/[/url]

    The Editorial Board
    Published 1 hour ago

    Alberta is endowed with abundant resources.

    The province’s economy of course is built on fossil fuels. But throughout Alberta’s southern expanses – as anyone who lives there or has visited can attest – there’s a lot of sunshine ([url]https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy/energy-sources-distribution/renewables/solar-photovoltaic-energy/tools-solar-photovoltaic-energy/photovoltaic-and-solar-resource-maps/18366[/url]) and a lot of wind ([url]https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy/renewable-electricity/wind/7323[/url]). These natural resources are part of the reason Alberta last year attracted almost all of the private capital invested in solar and wind power in Canada.

    Potential resources aren’t enough. Alberta is also well known – usually – for its business-orientated culture that rewards taking risks. In the late 1940s, Imperial Oil drilled a series of 133 wells. All of them came up empty. Then, near Edmonton, a gusher erupted at Leduc No. 1, launching Alberta’s oil industry.

    What helped launch solar and wind power in Alberta was the province’s electricity market, unique in Canada, where sellers of power can strike deals directly with buyers. This propelled renewable power, including in 2021 when Amazon agreed to buy the majority of the power from what would become the country’s largest solar farm. That underpinned Amazon’s plans to invest more than $3-billion at a new facility in Calgary and Alberta was dubbed ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-the-capital-of-wind-and-solar-power-in-canada-its-alberta/[/url]) the country’s capital of wind and solar power.

    It seemed like a perfect story: the province that was Canada’s leader in the 20th century energy of fossil fuels would be the country’s leader in the 21st century fuels of solar and wind.

    That ended last summer, when Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservative Party halted solar and wind project approvals. The government said the industry was growing too fast. Alberta has never shut down new oil projects in the face of breakneck development, not even in the mid-2000s when growth in the oil sands was unruly and former premier Peter Lougheed called for a pause.

    Last week, the province lifted the clean power halt but issued new rules (with more to come) that apply only to one industry. It is an attack on private business and it’s an attack on landowners’ rights. It is un-Albertan – the exact opposite of the principles the province holds dear.

    The main restrictions limit where projects can be built but the UCP hasn’t released key details. There is talk of “pristine viewscapes,” affecting as much as three-quarters of ([url]https://twitter.com/SimonJDyer/status/1762905814749053122[/url]) southern Alberta, yet the only certainty at present is fossil fuels will not face the same restrictions. The bottom line is the Alberta government will prevent private landowners from doing deals of their own volition with developers of renewable power. It’s hard to imagine Ms. Smith preventing an oil or natural gas well on private land in the Foothills because it would mar the view of the Rocky Mountains.

    This government attack on one industry is not a random event. While Ms. Smith says she supports net zero emissions by 2050, her actions are effectively working to ensure Alberta falls short. She opposes Ottawa’s goal to cut most emissions from power generation by 2035. Alberta is, she claims ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-why-are-the-provinces-so-resistant-to-clean-power/[/url]), “a natural-gas province.” Favouring fossil fuels and slowing clean power is the UCP strategy.

    This thinking isn’t new. When Jason Kenney was premier, and Amazon invested in Alberta because of clean power, the government didn’t even mention solar power. In last week’s provincial budget, the word oil appears 126 times. The word solar appears once.

    There are absolutely challenges in the development of renewable power, the same as with any form of energy. There are questions of transmission infrastructure and the need for widespread battery storage. Alberta is investing billions of dollars to subsidize carbon capture for the fossil fuel industry. Where is the public money for solar and wind?

    There’s plenty of investor money. Companies plowed $6.3-billion into clean power in Alberta since 2019, according to ([url]https://businessrenewables.ca/news/business-renewables-centre-canada-disappointed-cloud-uncertainty-continues-renewable-energy[/url]) Business Renewables Centre-Canada. Proposed projects through to 2028, if they can proceed, could attract $36-billion. That’s big-time money on the scale of the oil sands boom of the 2000s.

    Clean power is taking off across the country ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-canada-is-poised-to-power-up/[/url]) and around the world. British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec are all readying major investments. More than half the electricity in the industrial powerhouse of Germany is generated by renewables ([url]https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2024/public-electricity-generation-2023-renewable-energies-cover-the-majority-of-german-electricity-consumption-for-the-first-time.html[/url]).

    In Alberta, it’s less than 20 per cent. It could be much more – if Ms. Smith and the UCP weren’t purposefully trying to prevent a burgeoning industry from succeeding.
    ?

    #2
    Oh oh! Big government in Alberta is now picking winners and losers?

    Danny and the gatekeepers are opposed to free market investments and free enterprise?

    What happened to their free market Alberta is open for business mantra?

    What an embarrassment for Alberta to be seen as anti business and anti investment!



    Comment


      #3
      More Carbon please, the staff of green life on earth. ????

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        Oh oh! Big government in Alberta is now picking winners and losers?

        Danny and the gatekeepers are opposed to free market investments and free enterprise?

        What happened to their free market Alberta is open for business mantra?

        What an embarrassment for Alberta to be seen as anti business and anti investment!


        Chuck2, you keep repeating yourself lol. So Chuck2 in B.C. there is B.C. Hydro, in Saskatchewan there is Sask Power, Manitoba there is Manitoba Hydro, in Quebec Quebec Hydro. In all provinces electrical utilities are directed by government on what to build. The federal government has the proposed so called clean energy regulations. All these pick winners and losers, yet you continually attack Alberta, over and over, with the same messaging. Get a life!

        Comment


          #5
          More drought and higher temperatures and extreme weather too! Is that what you are asking for Sumdumb?

          Are you sure that's exactly what southern alberta needs this year?

          Comment


            #6
            Well done Danelle , nobody wants them eye sore bird choppers anywhere and everywhere , also madness putting junk pannels on good land , both useless anyhow when needed most

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Hamloc View Post

              Chuck2, you keep repeating yourself lol. So Chuck2 in B.C. there is B.C. Hydro, in Saskatchewan there is Sask Power, Manitoba there is Manitoba Hydro, in Quebec Quebec Hydro. In all provinces electrical utilities are directed by government on what to build. The federal government has the proposed so called clean energy regulations. All these pick winners and losers, yet you continually attack Alberta, over and over, with the same messaging. Get a life!
              Yes but Alberta chose a deregulated free market for electricity and says the market should decide what gets built. But now you are opposed to the free market? LOL

              Comment


                #8
                Glad to see we have a few premiers wth common sense.Need a little more of that with the Feds.

                Comment


                  #9
                  This seems repetitive.
                  Neither the writer nor the whiner own land in AB, nor were they ever approached to sign a contract.

                  Certified land agents weren't used.
                  Contracts were garbage. Income was not guaranteed and speculative. And cleanup only above ground and only if company existed.
                  Landowners who signed made assumptions based on safe experience with O&G and were duped. Just like '47.

                  And again, some highly productive land was being taken out.
                  Definitely a victory for land owners and agriculture. Maybe write some thoughts on Right to Farm. Fanatics are incredibly intellectually lazy.
                  Let's see if the govt has fixed it properly.
                  Last edited by blackpowder; Mar 5, 2024, 08:33.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    A premier in Alberta who dosen't like the free market!

                    Smith just another gatekeeper that little PP complains about?

                    What happened to get government out of the way?

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                      More drought and higher temperatures and extreme weather too! Is that what you are asking for Sumdumb?

                      Are you sure that's exactly what southern alberta needs this year?
                      Chuck2 I asked you this question on a previous thread, you did not respond. Are you saying covering good cultivated land with solar panels will make it rain? With Canada producing 1.5% of the worlds C02 emissions, do you believe decreasing our emissions say 20 or 30 or even 40% will affect the weather, the extreme weather? Do you think all the new coal fired electricity plants that China and India plan to build by 2030 will produce far more emissions than Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax will eliminate? If all the emissions from Canada vanished tomorrow would it make it rain in southern Alberta? I look forward to your response.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Why are you opposed to the free market Hamloc and against business investment?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                          Yes but Alberta chose a deregulated free market for electricity and says the market should decide what gets built. But now you are opposed to the free market? LOL
                          Has the Alberta government said it doesn’t want any new solar fields or windmills? It has said after consultation with stakeholders that number one and number 2 soil cultivated land is not the place to build a solar field. Governments aren’t allowed to regulate Chuck?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Hamloc View Post

                            Chuck2 I asked you this question on a previous thread, you did not respond. Are you saying covering good cultivated land with solar panels will make it rain? With Canada producing 1.5% of the worlds C02 emissions, do you believe decreasing our emissions say 20 or 30 or even 40% will affect the weather, the extreme weather? Do you think all the new coal fired electricity plants that China and India plan to build by 2030 will produce far more emissions than Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax will eliminate? If all the emissions from Canada vanished tomorrow would it make it rain in southern Alberta? I look forward to your response.
                            Actually, installing big enough solar farms could make it rain.

                            A new study suggests that gigantic solar farms could be used to create “heat islands” that make rain locally.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                              More drought and higher temperatures and extreme weather too! Is that what you are asking for Sumdumb?

                              Are you sure that's exactly what southern alberta needs this year?
                              please tell us approximately what level of carbon taxes are required to stop high temperatures and droughts? $100, $200, $1000? inquiring minds would like to know.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...