When you say "“that the appointment should consider what the individual has given to Canada, it should be an honor bestowed on a deserving Canadian that has made contributions to the country in some significant way.” what are we really appointing a GG for? Aren't we appointing someone to do a job, albeit one with a rather unusual job description, rather than bestowing an honorary position on someone for deeds past?
If that's the case maybe it's right that we should appoint someone with hopefully their best days ahead of them in terms of making a career and reputation for themselves rather than someone who is already "famous" and has been successful in another field?
If that's the case maybe it's right that we should appoint someone with hopefully their best days ahead of them in terms of making a career and reputation for themselves rather than someone who is already "famous" and has been successful in another field?
Comment