• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Albertans want federal climate regulation – just don’t tell Danielle Smith

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Albertans want federal climate regulation – just don’t tell Danielle Smith

    Albertans want federal climate regulation – just don’t tell Danielle Smith

    Jared Wesley
    Contributed to The Globe and Mail

    Professor Jared Wesley is a professor of political science at the University of Alberta and lead of the Common Ground initiative.

    The Alberta government has made a sport of fighting federal climate policy, claiming it infringes on the rights of Albertans. Under former premier Jason Kenney, Alberta fought the national carbon tax. More recently, Premier Danielle Smith threatened to use the Sovereignty Act if the federal government doesn’t stay out of Alberta’s energy business. A few weeks ago, Ms. Smith accused the federal Environment Minister of displaying “utter contempt” for Alberta through its plans to cap oil and gas emissions, and warned the federal government to “refrain from testing our government’s or Albertans’ resolve in this regard.”

    Whose resolve is she referring to?

    Ms. Smith, like others before her, is invoking a narrow stereotype of the average Albertan to project the popular will. In reality, most Albertans are supportive of working with the rest of the country on issues like climate change.

    Polls from Leger and Research Co. released this week show a majority of Albertans (around 60 per cent) want a national cap on oil and gas emissions. Support is especially strong among younger Albertans, with 76 per cent wanting a national cap, or the oil industry regulated at the federal level.

    After a frightening summer of wildfires that displaced thousands of Albertans from their homes, Albertans are making the link and growing personally concerned about climate change. According to the two polls, around 7 in 10 Albertans say they are personally concerned about climate change.

    Our Viewpoint Alberta survey from August, 2023, shows similar results. More than three-quarters of Albertans indicated they are concerned about climate change with nearly half attributing the severity of this summer’s wildfires to global warming. These opinions span the political spectrum, and while they are less prominent in rural than urban areas, demonstrate widespread worry about our environmental and economic future.

    In earlier Common Ground research at the University of Alberta, we’ve learned that Albertans are not enraged with the federal government, as the Premier’s talking points suggest. While most feel that their province is misunderstood and sometimes taken for granted in Confederation, the vast majority of Albertans want to build stronger relationships with the rest of Canada. They want to see their governments work together to solve problems (not fight), they want more input into national decision making (not less) and they want to strengthen national institutions (not withdraw from them).

    These sentiments are not reflected in the government’s messaging, however. Instead, we see a distortion of the public will with political narratives that speak to a small base of supporters.

    Ms. Smith is not speaking on behalf of a majority of Albertans when she turns her back on wind and solar, or when she maligns the federal government as a threat to the province’s interests. She is not advocating on behalf of many in Alberta’s business community, and definitely not the desires of our youth.

    Our Common Ground team has spent four years studying the gap between who Albertans actually are as individuals and how they see themselves as a community. Our surveys show the average Albertan is moderate and in many ways progressive when it comes to social and environmental policy. Yet, when asked to describe the attitudes of the “typical” Albertan, our participants peg their political culture as far more conservative.

    In our January, 2023, survey, nearly half of all respondents (46 per cent) backed plans to “transition Alberta’s economy away from oil and gas,” with only one in four (23 per cent) opposing the move. In a follow up question, we asked people what proportion of Albertans they thought would back such a transition. The average response was 29 percent, indicating a 17 point gap between actual and perceived support. In other words, Albertans are more supportive of environmental measures than they see themselves to be.

    This false sense of social reality stands in the way of reform. If Albertans don’t think their views are mainstream, they’re less likely to advocate for them and more likely to consider environmentalists as “extreme.” And if residents believe the typical Albertan is unlikely to support collective action, they’re less likely to push for it themselves regardless of their own, personal views.

    The Smith government’s rhetoric flies in the face of public opinion, typecasting Albertans as shills for the oil and gas industry and enraged at the idea of federal climate regulation. If enough residents realize their own views are in the mainstream, they can begin to throw off these stereotypes and demand more than bluster and foot-dragging from their provincial government. And, more than a distortion of who they really are.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-albertans-want-federal-climate-regulation-just-dont-tell-danielle/

    #2
    Of course a percentage of young people polled and a professor would want more "federal mandates".

    Comment


      #3
      I do NOT want federal climate regulation.

      I’m open to provincial regulations. Feds can piss off.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Blaithin View Post
        I do NOT want federal climate regulation.

        I’m open to provincial regulations. Feds can piss off.
        We had a provincial Carbon Tax plan ready to be implemented and the UCP decided to go with the Fed plan when they got elected. Why didn't they want a provincial plan?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by walterm View Post
          We had a provincial Carbon Tax plan ready to be implemented and the UCP decided to go with the Fed plan when they got elected. Why didn't they want a provincial plan?
          I doubt it was that they didn’t want a provincial plan. They ran their platform on the promise to get rid of the provincial one and look all wonderful by kicking Notley’s initiative to the curb.

          That was absolutely more of a party politics action than an actual for the people action. It’s too bad they didn’t more seriously consider the ramifications of it.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by walterm View Post
            We had a provincial Carbon Tax plan ready to be implemented and the UCP decided to go with the Fed plan when they got elected. Why didn't they want a provincial plan?
            A carbon tax at any level is fraudulent because it is based on utter BS. So any government who tries to be honest can't be party to one. That is why the UCP, having a shred of decency, removed the carbon tax. Then the hopelessly corrupt feds implemented one because there is no evil they wont do.

            Comment


              #7
              If nobody is going to put up a true fight against this insanity, might as well just copy Quebecs fake cap and trade plan with California. They have nice little grift going there.

              The carbon tax is unconstitutional because it’s not applied or rebated equitably. But that didn’t stop our corrupt SCC.

              Smith is already taking about allowing some interim emmisions cap. I knew she would cave. Another Kenny in the works.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by jazz View Post
                If nobody is going to put up a true fight against this insanity, might as well just copy Quebecs fake cap and trade plan with California. They have nice little grift going there.

                The carbon tax is unconstitutional because it’s not applied or rebated equitably. But that didn’t stop our corrupt SCC.

                Smith is already taking about allowing some interim emmisions cap. I knew she would cave. Another Kenny in the works.
                Originally posted by jazz View Post
                If nobody is going to put up a true fight against this insanity, might as well just copy Quebecs fake cap and trade plan with California. They have nice little grift going there.

                The carbon tax is unconstitutional because it’s not applied or rebated equitably. But that didn’t stop our corrupt SCC.

                Smith is already taking about allowing some interim emmisions cap. I knew she would cave. Another Kenny in the works.



                Was it a blind survey or did they only survey people in edmonton ( a more left leaning city).
                Rural people? What age groups?
                Need some.statistical reference here because i can easily run a survey that can be skewed.

                For instance.

                " is chuckchuck an internet troll ?"

                If the survey was put up on agriville then i think we know how the results would go....
                Throw it out there onto the streets of Calgary and it would be wildly different results but both would technically be a blind survey.

                One of the brightest ag minds in Alberta, who worked for pretty much every big Ag company out there, told me he had never been to a trial where the companies product didnt finish first...point being. We can skew the results however we want!

                Comment


                  #9
                  The Supreme court already ruled the carbon tax is constitutional.

                  Skippy will ditch it and replace it with watered down regulations and some vague promise that technology will do the hard lifting of reducing carbon emissions.

                  And PP agrees human caused climate change is real and so does Daniel Smith. But they don't want to give up the goose that lays the golden eggs in Alberta.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Goalie. Almost half of Alberta voted for the NDP.

                    But when the polls show PP in the lead they must be right? LOL

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                      The Supreme court already ruled the carbon tax is constitutional.

                      Skippy will ditch it and replace it with watered down regulations and some vague promise that technology will do the hard lifting of reducing carbon emissions.

                      And PP agrees human caused climate change is real and so does Daniel Smith. But they don't want to give up the goose that lays the golden eggs in Alberta.
                      Just get another cheque from Justin or Jagmeet? You have been fairly quiet. Now a sudden flurry of cut and pastes! I find responding pointless. It is the same as when a reporter asks Justin Trudeau a question and his answer doesn’t address the question in any way, just a waste of time. Hope your harvest is going well Chuck. One day I tried running my combine on unicorn farts, damn thing wouldn’t even start lol. Enjoy your Sunday.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Hamloc did you just get another check from Danny Smith or PP? LOL

                        You don't want to believe the polls on the attitudes of your fellow Albertan's? Or whats your problem?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                          Goalie. Almost half of Alberta voted for the NDP.

                          But when the polls show PP in the lead they must be right? LOL
                          Almost half the people who voted, voted for the NDP.

                          That doesn’t mean half of Alberta. Just as this poll doesn’t mean it’s representative.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                            Goalie. Almost half of Alberta voted for the NDP.

                            But when the polls show PP in the lead they must be right? LOL
                            A lot of Albertans , I hope by now have figured out that a vote for the NDP is a vote for Justin . If they want to go back to the dark ages , just vote for the NDP again.

                            Just my 2 cents Chuck

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Alberta is changing and is much more progressive on many issues. Much to the chagrin of many rural conservatives.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...