• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

99% of humans are about to experience sunlight at the same time tomorrow

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • biglentil
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 3258

    #51
    Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
    The airlines haven't been using their sprayers as there are no con-trails for most days now.

    We must be at maximum dose of stupid juice or whatever it is they spray us with?
    I don't know about contrails but definitely alot rocks in peoples heads. Too hard headed to look out over the plain into the distance at the horizontal eyezone (horizon) and ask themselves the simple question, "If Earth is a globe why can I see the horizon out 20 miles or further?" When the 'Science' of a globe earth states the horizon is only visible for 3 or so miles while standing at ground level.
    Last edited by biglentil; Jul 10, 2023, 11:18.

    Comment

    • Blaithin
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2016
      • 2511

      #52
      Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
      The airlines haven't been using their sprayers as there are no con-trails for most days now.

      We must be at maximum dose of stupid juice or whatever it is they spray us with?
      They’re out spraying here right now.

      Little seeders everywhere.

      Comment

      • goalieguy847
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2017
        • 656

        #53
        At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

        Sincerely,

        Billy

        Comment

        • biglentil
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2015
          • 3258

          #54
          Originally posted by goalieguy847 View Post
          At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

          Sincerely,

          Billy
          The Iq 80 peanut gallery arrived. Yay!

          Comment

          • Blaithin
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2016
            • 2511

            #55
            Originally posted by biglentil View Post
            The Iq 80 peanut gallery arrived. Yay!
            Disagreeing doesn’t equal low IQ.

            Complete and easy agreement over something would be more of an indication of low IQ than any disagreeing.

            Comment

            • biglentil
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2015
              • 3258

              #56
              Originally posted by Blaithin View Post
              Disagreeing doesn’t equal low IQ.

              Complete and easy agreement over something would be more of an indication of low IQ than any disagreeing.
              I do not recall Goalieguy offering any valuable insight on either side of any debate. I call it how I see it.

              Comment

              • Blaithin
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2016
                • 2511

                #57
                No offering valuable insight doesn’t reflect IQ, just how much energy a person is willing to spend.

                Comment

                • biglentil
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2015
                  • 3258

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Blaithin View Post
                  No offering valuable insight doesn’t reflect IQ, just how much energy a person is willing to spend.
                  Most of the energy required by this individual in this circumstance was the act of typing or cut and paste. Valuable input to either side of the debate could have been achieved by even fewer characters and thus a lower energy input. So would you agree "troll" is a more accurate description?

                  Comment

                  • Blaithin
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2016
                    • 2511

                    #59
                    If he continues to do it, sure, troll fits.

                    One time? Sharing his opinion.

                    Comment

                    • biglentil
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 3258

                      #60
                      Here is a court case msm would never report on. Court found that there is no proof of curvature, not once but twice.

                      https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZM2QveyxU/

                      Last edited by biglentil; Jul 11, 2023, 22:11.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...