Originally posted by jazz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
First Nations lay claim to all critical minerals
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
The province owns the vast majority of minerals in the province and that is shared with every taxpayer even though the Sask Party gives the oil companies really low royalty rates relative to other countries.
Anytime the provinces talk about higher royalty rates the oil companies shut it down to keep their profits as high as possible. Danny Williams got Newfoundland a better deal but the western premiers are too cosy with the oil companies to stand up against them. Taxpayers own most of the oil and its not going anywhere but the Alberta and Saskatchewan governments give them a nice handout with low rates.
First nations are saying that they deserve a larger share because rare earth minerals were not part of the treaties on ancestral lands.
The justice minister is going to take a look at Natural resource Act transfers from the Federal government to the provinces in the 1930s. First Nations reserve lands were excluded and ancestral land minerals weren't included in the treaties.
Moe wants to pick another fight with Ottawa at every opportunity. But he will be bound by federal treaties and a duty to consult and the eventual supreme court decision if it gets that far without being settled first.Last edited by chuckChuck; Apr 11, 2023, 07:50.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostFirst nations are saying that they deserve a larger share because rare earth minerals were not part of the treaties on ancestral lands.
The justice minister is going to take a look at Natural resource Act transfers from the Federal government to the provinces in the 1930s. First Nations reserve lands were excluded and ancestral land minerals weren't included in the treaties.
Natives have no more right to whats under our feet than does some yahoo in Toronto.
This is just grifting on to a industry that this group had zero contribution to. And it will end all of our natural resource investment if it goes through.Last edited by jazz; Apr 11, 2023, 09:19.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostThats some pure bullshite chuck. Every citizen shares in the wealth of our resources on an equal basis and we have rigged equalization payments to make sure of that.
Natives have no more right to whats under our feet than does some yahoo in Toronto.
This is just grifting on to a industry that this group had zero contribution to. And it will end all of our natural resource investment if it goes through.
Comment
-
Some of you are not aware that native bands are suing to open up a clause in the treaties that were supposed to provide them implements to farm back in the late 1800s. Since plows and pick axes dont qualify anymore, they are suing for pure cash in the 10s of millions.
Even bands that dont have a farmable acre are in on it.
https://lrrcn.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Final-settlement-agreement.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostSome of you are not aware that native bands are suing to open up a clause in the treaties that were supposed to provide them implements to farm back in the late 1800s. Since plows and pick axes dont qualify anymore, they are suing for pure cash in the 10s of millions.
Even bands that dont have a farmable acre are in on it.
https://lrrcn.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Final-settlement-agreement.pdf
[ATTACH]12363[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostThats some pure bullshite chuck. Every citizen shares in the wealth of our resources on an equal basis and we have rigged equalization payments to make sure of that.
Natives have no more right to whats under our feet than does some yahoo in Toronto.
This is just grifting on to a industry that this group had zero contribution to. And it will end all of our natural resource investment if it goes through.
Comment
-
The provinces have control over provincial resources except on federal lands and reserves and that wont change as it is in the constitution.
What might change is recognition that first nations are entitled to a share in further resource development on ancestral land along with some say in their development.
How that plays out in the political arena and legally is yet to be seen.
In the early part of last century several first nations saw a significant part of their reserve land base carved off and given to settlers. The treaties were signed but broken. First nations people were prevented from farming and the best land was given to settlers.
And minerals were never signed over in the treaties. So they have a legitimate claim to a share in resource development.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment