Originally posted by fjlip
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Climate Clown Planet
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 25, 2023, 12:27.
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostYes and you forgot to mention the economic cost of human caused climate change and the risk of irreversible tipping points that make the cost of adaptation and mitigation look small in comparison.
You guys think its all a socialist plot! Just like Steve said.
Ignore the science and the cost and it will all go away! LOL
Can you indicate in the historical record when these climate tipping points were reached previous times? For example when CO2 was 10 times higher than today, was the tipping point reached?
Comment
-
Originally posted by biglentil View PostScience
[ATTACH]12249[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
So you had to go back 70 years to produce evidence that the current climate science can't be "settled" or trusted? LOL Good one!
So this is evidence that we shouldn't rely on the overwhelming science of today to make informed decisions about anything? That all of climate science will someday be proven wrong!
It's not as if the capability of humans and technological advancements along with our scientific knowledge have advanced since 1950? Naw that wouldn't be the case would it?
So when you are invited to speak at a climate science climate conference or any science conference and your argument is that the psychiatric science of 70 years ago was wrong and that because of this, we know for sure that all the current science is also wrong. That's going to be your evidence? You will have them rolling in fits of laughter in the aisles!
I think the problem for some of you guys is your thinking and knowledge is from about 70 years ago and your logic is missing!
You really got to work on some better excuses.
Give the f..k up!Last edited by chuckChuck; Mar 26, 2023, 08:21.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostSo you had to go back 70 years to produce evidence that the current climate science can't be "settled" or trusted? LOL Good one!
So this is evidence that we shouldn't rely on the overwhelming science of today to make informed decisions about anything? That all of climate science will someday be proven wrong!
It's not as if the capability of humans and technological advancements along with our scientific knowledge have advanced since 1950? Naw that wouldn't be the case would it?
So when you are invited to speak at a climate science climate conference or any science conference and your argument is that the psychiatric science of 70 years ago was wrong and that because of this, we know for sure that all the current science is also wrong. That's going to be your evidence? You will have them rolling in fits of laughter in the aisles!
I think the problem for some of you guys is your thinking and knowledge is from about 70 years ago and your logic is missing!
You really got to work on some better excuses.
Give the f..k up!
Comment
-
Speaking of missing logic and dumb climate change ideas! Perfect timing A5 and Hamloc.
And you have never sworn and are offended by those who do? It's a point of emphasis. Not that it will work. LOL
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostSteve Harper "its a socialist plot" LOL
So why does he get to be called Steve, but every other conservative politician gets a y added to their name, Polly and Danny and Scotty etc.?
Comment
-
Stevey in 2015 also signed a G7 agreement to end the use of fossil fuels for energy by the year 2100.
Oh shit you forgot about that didn't you! Stevey was visionary, even if a bit slow, compared to most of the flat earthers of today. LOL He must have been party to the socialist plot!
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-commits-to-ending-fossil-fuel-use-by-2100/article24844340/
Canada commits to G7 plan to end use of fossil fuels
Comment
-
-
Now I have no idea what you were talking about. What socialist plot are you referring to? Is it recent, I haven't heard anything about this.
And, thank you for being consistent with the additional Y. I was beginning to suspect there was some sort of hierarchy amongst the conservative politicians as to who does and doesn't deserve a Y.
Although honestly, I am a little jealous that you often refer to Hammy and Willy, etc, but I I haven't earned a cute nickname of my own yet.Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 26, 2023, 10:04.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment