• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Martins grand plans

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Martins grand plans

    December 22, 2003

    TITLE: Martin will have trouble with the premiers, Parliament and the U.S.

    Enough now has been said by and about Paul Martin for all of us to guess where he will steer the grand national bus.

    He gave an interesting outline of his thinking in Toronto on December 9.

    "Fundamentally," he declared, "what we have to do is change the way that Ottawa works."

    There are three priorities. First, Canada must be at the leading edge of the 21st century economy; second, social programs must meet Canada's evolving needs; and third, Canada must enhance its international prestige and influence.

    Note that these are "the nation's objectives," not just his. They are now yours and mine.

    The first priority in achieving the three basic priorities, Martin elaborated, is to review and measure every single national program and expenditure against two over-riding priorities--is this expenditure achieving its ends, and are its ends still worth achieving?

    After all, "government has to understand that a dollar misspent is a dollar taken away from a Canadian who really needs it." (No, Paul, it's a dollar taken away from a Canadian who OWNS it--whether or not you think he "needs" it.)

    This dynamic program review will free up resources for three very exciting new priorities.

    The first priority is "changing the way Ottawa works with the other governments you elect." This means better central government relations with the provinces and a "New Deal" for cities.

    Even though cities are within the constitutional "ambit" of the provinces, Martin acknowledged, "the fate of our country and of our cities is inextricably linked." So, regardless of the constitution, Ottawa really, really wants to help.

    The second main priority is making Parliament and the national government "more accountable." Fundamentally, he said, this means more free votes in Parliament. "It means we have to reengage Canadians in the political process. Parliament must become the front line in the debate of new ideas."

    The third main priority is to make globalization work for all of humanity. "Because of the incredible diversity of our population," he told his Toronto audience, "we are where the world is going, not where it has been--and we are so much the richer for it. For this reason, we have a moral responsibility--reflective of our values as a people--to provide the catalyst that will cause the sovereign nations of the planet to assume their collective responsibility to the world as a whole."

    Make of that what you can.

    From this speech and what he has done since, several things seem obvious.

    Martin will not have peace with the provinces. All the social programs and urban responsibilities he has such grand designs for are in the sovereign jurisdiction of provincial governments, which can and will angrily resist his encroachments.

    He will not reform democracy. Anyone seeking rapid change can't afford to wait around while 301 MPs say what their constituents think about the new activities of 39 ministers and 26 parliamentary secretaries. Martin will have to increase, not reduce, the power of Ottawa's two central super-agencies, the Prime Minister's Office and the Privy Council Office.

    As Donald Savoie points out in his book Governing from the Centre, you can have a large, bureaucratic government, or you can have a vibrant democracy, but not both. The golden age of modern democracy was the era of small, limited government.

    Finally, Martin's enthusiasm for globalism, if it ever amounts to anything resembling policy, will offend the Americans, who reject Kyoto, despise UN social policy, and resent Canada's holier-than-thou abandonment of the Anglo-American alliance of the last century. And they can kill us economically.

    "As a nation," Martin said in Toronto, "we can do whatever we put our minds to."

    All it takes is a happy thought and a little pixie dust. If he seriously believes such rhetoric he will fail as prime minister. And if he doesn't he shouldn't have said it.

    - Link Byfield is chairman of the Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy

    Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy
    #203, 10441 - 178 Street
    Edmonton, AB T5S 1R5

    Phone: 780-481-7844
    Fax: 780-481-9983
    Email: contact@citizenscentre.com

    #2
    I am starting to get some negative vibes about Mr. Martin! I suspect he has an agenda that isn't exactly what he preaches.
    He talks about "free votes" in Parliment but on what issues? Perhaps the ones he really wants to fail? So for example, if he doesn't want to deal with the dope issue for example, he has a free vote so he does'nt have to do anything? I doubt we'll be getting any "free votes" on things like whether we should give the large corporations more tax breaks?
    Sheila Copps(whether you hate her or not) has gotten a pretty ugly rush out the door by Martin. He told her quit politics or he would make sure she wouldn't win her riding nomination! Sounds like a real democrat to me! I assume if she goes quietly she gets some sweetheart deal, but old Sheila isn't one to go with the flow!
    Martin seems to be ready to kiss Bushes butt and make us all little American toadies which kind of bugs me. Harper and Martin seem to be competing for who can be the biggest American flunkie and sell us out for the cheapest price!

    Comment


      #3
      The tough part will be to remember what Martin did while he was with Chretian and not what he is doing now as he prepares for an election. Mz. Copps is crying foul because she is not getting her way and this is a very oppotyune time for Martin to cleanse the group -especially the ones who are an embarrassment to his party--imagine paying for dead rabbits hung on trees.I still fell that we will never have a true democracy if we continue with leaders with the dictitorial powers of our Prime Ministers office. Heck-we all talk about the Martin government and most of us had little or nothing to do about putting him in power. We do not elect a Prime Minister-He automatically becomes our Leader if his party wins the majority of seats in the Commons.

      Comment


        #4
        Someting to take note of too is that he said that he would let, or permit, MPs to have imput into senate appointments!!
        Duh?? What about regional imput,like provinces.

        Comment


          #5
          Well we have two senators in waiting that were elected! Martin could go a long way in calming the west by appointing them? Right now there is one opening in Alberta(Nick Taylors seat). Will Martin do the right thing and appoint the man the people of Alberta voted for? Or will we get some old faithful party hack?
          I think how he handles that one will show us where his head is in regard to the west?

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...