Posting here because this forum seems to think about the dollars-and-cents side of decisions, which is what I've been chewing on.
Nitrogen's one of the biggest controllable input costs, and a flat rate across different fields almost guarantees you're over-applying on some and under on others. I built a tool that works out a field-by-field rate from soil, satellite history and weather, with the reasoning shown, so the spend matches what the field can actually use.
It's free this season, I'm trying to prove whether it actually saves money on real operations, not just on paper. I'd run a few of your fields, you'd see the recommendations and decide what to do, and at harvest you'd tell me what happened.
Not a pitch, genuinely looking for testers who'll be straight with me about whether it's worth anything. Reply or message me if you want to kick the tires.
Thanks and have a wonderful season
Dan
For more about the tool: [url]www.agriflow.io[/url]
Nitrogen's one of the biggest controllable input costs, and a flat rate across different fields almost guarantees you're over-applying on some and under on others. I built a tool that works out a field-by-field rate from soil, satellite history and weather, with the reasoning shown, so the spend matches what the field can actually use.
It's free this season, I'm trying to prove whether it actually saves money on real operations, not just on paper. I'd run a few of your fields, you'd see the recommendations and decide what to do, and at harvest you'd tell me what happened.
Not a pitch, genuinely looking for testers who'll be straight with me about whether it's worth anything. Reply or message me if you want to kick the tires.
Thanks and have a wonderful season
Dan
For more about the tool: [url]www.agriflow.io[/url]