• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Sale of Agricore United Terminal in Vancouver

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • charliep
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2000
    • 9002

    Sale of Agricore United Terminal in Vancouver

    Just curious as to why no one have commented on the sale of the Vancouver terminal.

    http://www.agriculture.com/ag/futuresource/FutureSourceStoryIndex.jhtml;jsessionid=3LGV4WB4YA NQJQFIBQPSBHQ?storyType=grain&storyId=88900327

    Would seem to put more competition in port and put some of the smaller grain companies/farmer owned terminals on a better competitive footing relative to the big guys. What are others thoughts?
  • crusher
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2001
    • 1188

    #2
    What did FNA buy?

    Comment

    • kamichel
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 631

      #3
      Looks to me like nothing.

      Comment

      • nicolaas
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2005
        • 325

        #4
        Glad it got sold. Any competition on the coast that may help to bring down my elevation costs is a good thing. Sure do not like all my money going to a few big players. I like to spread it around a bit. Too bad about FNA, but at least its sold.... Now what to do about the railways...

        Comment

        • gregpet
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2007
          • 770

          #5
          Charlie, any word on the street if this group had to make a deal with the CWB for tonnage commitment to make it feasible? What are the consequences of a CWB deal to producers, single point grain terminals and the big boys? What will a CWB deal be worth if/when wheat moves to a voluntary system? I, personally believe the west coast is overbuilt with shipping capacity and would rather see the raw product processed here at home and not shipped out.

          Comment

          • kamichel
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 631

            #6
            One thing I did not like about the FNA deal was that it was just a membership that the farmer purchased. Plus it sounded to good to be true. I could be wrong but as a member the farmer would not really be the owner. So then who would be the owner in the farmer member FNA deal.

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...