• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

What if scenario. Fertilizer and diesel shortages and world supply.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SASKFARMER
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 7003

    What if scenario. Fertilizer and diesel shortages and world supply.

    Potential Grain Price Impacts

    Grain prices (especially wheat, corn, and to some extent soybeans) could surge dramatically due to:

    • Reduced global yields from fertilizer shortages (even modest cuts in nitrogen application can drop yields 10-20%+ for corn/wheat).

    • Higher input/transport costs pushing marginal land out of production.

    • Panic buying, hoarding, and food security fears in import-dependent regions.

    • Correlated rallies (grains often follow energy spikes; some analysts note 90% correlation between crude and corn in volatile periods).

    Realistic high-end estimates based on similar past shocks (e.g., 2022 Ukraine war fertilizer/energy spikes) and current analyst views on prolonged Hormuz issues:

    • Corn: Could reach $8-12/bushel or higher in extreme cases (some traders discuss $10+ if oil hits $150/barrel and yields drop significantly). Current levels are ~$4.50-4.70; a doubling or tripling isn’t unthinkable in a multi-year supply crunch.

    • Wheat: Potentially $10-15+/bushel (or more in spikes), as it’s more export-reliant and sensitive to Black Sea + fertilizer issues. Recent peaks in volatile periods have approached $10-12 historically.

    • Overall grains: Index-level increases of 50-150%+ from current baselines aren’t out of the question for sustained disruption, echoing or exceeding 2008 or 2012 food price crises but amplified by concurrent fertilizer/energy blocks.

    Analysts warn of:

    • New bull cycles in grains if crude sustains $100-150+.

    • Food inflation spikes (e.g., 2%+ added to US food-at-home via fertilizer alone).

    • Yield risks for 2026/2027 crops, tightening balances further.

    This is speculative and depends on duration, severity, alternatives (e.g., rerouting, domestic production ramps, releases from stocks), and policy responses (subsidies, export bans). A full-year shutdown is catastrophic and unprecedented—markets would likely see extreme volatility, with initial surges followed by potential demand destruction if prices get too high.

    In short, grains could easily double or triple from current levels in the worst sustained case, pushing wheat toward $10-15/bushel and corn $8-12+, with peaks even higher during panic phases. This would represent one of the most severe global food/ag shocks in modern history.
  • SASKFARMER
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 7003

    #2
    Impacts on the Regions I mentioned!

    • USA
    The U.S. has strong domestic production (especially nitrogen from natural gas) but still imports a portion of its needs—around 15% of imports from the Middle East historically, plus exposure to global price spikes. Farmers (e.g., corn growers) are bracing for higher costs and potential short-term shortages or rationing, especially for urea and phosphates. This could lead to reduced application rates, shifts in planted acreage (e.g., less corn), lower yields, and higher food prices downstream. Groups like the American Farm Bureau and National Corn Growers Association are highlighting risks to spring planting and food security. The U.S. can pivot somewhat to domestic or alternative suppliers (e.g., Russia, Canada), but global volatility will still drive up costs.

    • Australia
    Australia is highly vulnerable—it imported over 60% of its urea from the Middle East (UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia) in recent years. Domestic stockpiles may only last until mid-April 2026, after which farmers will scramble for alternatives (e.g., Southeast Asia), facing much higher prices and potential shortages. This hits grain and pasture production hard in a country reliant on imports for key nutrients.

    • South America (e.g., Brazil as the main agricultural powerhouse)
    Brazil imports nearly all its urea (about half typically from the Middle East) and a big chunk of phosphates. It’s just starting purchases for the 2026-27 soybean season, so the timing is critical. Disruptions could force competition for scarcer supplies from other sources, driving prices up and potentially reducing planted area or yields for soy and other crops. Brazil and other South American countries are listed among the “agricultural powerhouses” most impacted, alongside the U.S. and Australia.

    • Europe
    Europe has reduced domestic production due to high natural gas costs (post-Ukraine war legacy), relying more on imports. The conflict is spiking energy costs further (natural gas up sharply), which feeds into fertilizer manufacturing and prices. While not as directly dependent on Gulf urea as some regions, the global ripple effects mean tighter supplies, higher costs, and risks to crop production. EU farmers may face similar pressures as in the U.S., with potential shifts to less fertilizer-intensive crops

    Comment

    • farmaholic
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 17482

      #3
      ......by next fall it will be the largest world crop ever. At least that's what the Indusry will be telling us.... until it isn't. Sarcasm as always.

      Comment

      • SASKFARMER
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2005
        • 7003

        #4
        The country is likely facing the hardest time importing nitrogen fertilizer right now—and thus at risk of the worst crop impacts in the near term—is Bangladesh followed by India Africa and Sri Lanka.

        US and Canada — The US is relatively insulated due to high domestic ammonia production (~94% self-sufficiency) and earlier imports, but urea prices have roughly doubled in recent months, with spikes of 30-50%+ since the conflict escalated. Farmers face high replacement costs and competition for available supply. Reports indicate lower pre-purchases this year due to poor farm profitability, meaning more reliance on spot markets amid shortages. No widespread reports of excess unbought tons; instead, concerns about disruptions to March-April imports (peak season for nitrogen arrivals). Analysts note the US has been trading at a discount to global benchmarks recently, but global tightness pulls prices up.

        • Europe — Heavy reliance on imports (including from Russia, which supplied ~22% in 2025), combined with high energy costs and policy factors (e.g., CBAM carbon adjustments), has driven price surges. Imports spiked massively in late 2025 to beat policy deadlines, but current disruptions exacerbate tightness. No evidence of large unbought volumes; affordability issues and high prices are pressuring demand, but supply constraints dominate.

        • Australia — Over 60% of urea imports came from the Middle East in 2025, with domestic stocks only lasting to mid-April 2026. Beyond that, sourcing shifts to alternatives (e.g., Southeast Asia), but tightness and price hikes are expected rather than excess.

        Interesting times ahead.

        Comment

        • Old Cowzilla
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2020
          • 1582

          #5
          Couple of neighbors said they will clean up a couple of bins of soybeans instead of canola and the fert guys can keep the nitrogen . Might be a tough year for crop ins. companies . Wasn't the war in the Ukraine going to rock world grain prices when it started or like everyone says "it's different this time".

          Comment

          • goalieguy847
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2017
            • 671

            #6
            If wheat makes it to 8.50 new crop id eat my hat. ( id be happy to eat a hat if it made wheat values go up)
            last year we were roughly 1/3rd of our acres in wheat... this yr we have.. 5% . I dont see a real uptick coming down the line at us when wheat barely made it to 13$ during russian/ ukraine war start..and those area affected grew tons of acres of wheat.
            i want wheat to rise. We NEED wheat to rise.
            7.50 for new crop hrs and... 1300$ urea. Make it make it make sense. A canola blend for fertilizer here in alberta is up 30$/ ac in the past month.. and chemical is about to rise ( just got notice from our retail and a friend who sells off brand chem)

            BOOK YOUR CHEM. BOOK IT NOW. If its not on a boat currently or already on canadian dirt... its gonna be tough to get.

            no matter how dire the situation gets... wheat aint goin past 8.50... some magic unicorn crop will show up.

            Canola will ride on oil complex increase...

            But at this point.. everything needs to go up because margins are beyond tight.

            Comment

            • Rareearth
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2012
              • 1618

              #7
              So maybe a USA drought will do it?

              Comment

              • sumdumguy
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2007
                • 11992

                #8
                There’s talk of a super el nino later this year. 1986, then 1988 are memorable el ninos, lentils and canaryseed went ballistic those years. We never grew many peas buy Larry, Dave and Vicki would remember the pea pop-ups. In the el nino years we were not sorry to have bins full of carry over, for sure. The world needs to eat.

                Comment

                • TASFarms
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2014
                  • 1350

                  #9
                  Central to south east US was burning like crazy.
                  High mineral application plus a high amount of Iron to fix a chemical deficiency.
                  Last edited by TASFarms; Mar 23, 2026, 12:09.

                  Comment

                  • farmaholic
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 17482

                    #10
                    Seems those caused more harm than good for too many years on our farm.
                    They have their place for certain jobs but in my opinion are a poor replacement for the benefits of continuous cropping. Wide scale tillage degraded our farm's soil.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...