Diesel aftertreatment provides ZERO benfit to the user aside from a reduced threat of ban from those who could care less if it disappeared. The benefits are very much a "public good", but yet all the costs are incurred privately.
If *I* see no benefit, then why am I paying for its maintenance under threat of fines or imprisonment if i get rid of it? Perhaps warranties should be eternal, and gov't should be paying thr cost of maintenance? If the benefits are difuse, then surely the costs should be as well. Have to wonder what that line item on a gov't budget would look like?
If *I* see no benefit, then why am I paying for its maintenance under threat of fines or imprisonment if i get rid of it? Perhaps warranties should be eternal, and gov't should be paying thr cost of maintenance? If the benefits are difuse, then surely the costs should be as well. Have to wonder what that line item on a gov't budget would look like?
Comment