This website uses tracking tools, including cookies. We use these technologies for a variety of
reasons, including to recognize new and past website users, to customize your experience, perform
analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the
Internet based on your interests.
You agree to our and by clicking I agree.
You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.
we are not alone 2
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
the farmers, and true farmers behind barleyvote.ca need any help or informating choice producers can give them too. The CWB, no doubt, will be funneling our pool accout monies to the pro CWB side some how! Need to control them doing that, and get the vote out, and get barley the freedom it deserves!!
The Canadian Grain Trade
1931-1951 by D.A. McGibbon
U of Toronto press 1952
p. 64
QUOTE
The earlier theory had been that compulsory marketing would bring higher prices, but when compulsory marketing was actually establishd it was to keep prices under control. UNQUOTE
QUOTE
Wheat was no longer a free article of commerce, but was subject to the policies decided upon by the wheat committee of the Canadian Cabinet, the really effective body in determining the course followed by the Wheat Board.
UNQUOTE
QUOTE
It should be noted, however, that while the Government's measures were directed towards giving the wheat producers basic protection, the general wartime controls instituted to keep prices down applied more severely to wheat than any other commodity.
UNQUOTE
Comment