• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WCE Press Release

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    WCE Press Release

    Media Release Printable Version
    WCE Has Risk Management Vehicle Ready for Dual Marketing in Barley
    Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - Winnipeg - Winnipeg Commodity Exchange Inc. (WCE) is confident that revisions made to the Western Barley Futures Contract that are effective with the October 2007 contract will result in the development of an international barley contract on the scale of the current canola contract when dual marketing is implemented. Winnipeg will become the price discovery and risk management center for international barley trade.

    The contract is structured to function for producers, domestic and international consumers and processors, exporters, grain companies, investors and the Canadian Wheat Board. As with canola today the revised contract under dual marketing will price barley on the Canadian prairies reflecting both domestic and international market activity.

    The current Western Barley Futures Contract has proven to be an excellent price discovery and risk management tool for domestic barley producers and consumers, however, because of the existence of the CWB monopoly, arbitrage opportunities between the domestic and export market cannot be fully incorporated in the price.

    Today prairie barley farmers are not getting sufficient price signals from the export market. CWB PROs do not provide farmers with accurate and timely price signals for the current or deferred export market and therefore cannot be relied on by farmers as an indication of whether they are achieving a fair price in the domestic market relative to the world price. Under dual marketing the Western Barley Futures Contract would provide those needed price signals.

    Farmers have come to rely on WCE to successfully hedge and price their canola. Canola production, exports and value added processing in Canada have steadily increased over the past two decades as producers have responded to visible price signals provided by the WCE canola contract. In addition market participants world-wide rely on WCE as the premiere price discovery and risk management tool for global canola and ****seed. These same price signals are needed for barley if farmers are going to achieve the same results in marketing their barley crop.

    Data collected and analyzed by Informa Economics (available on the WCE Website www.wce.ca) shows that the current PROs for feed barley understate the value of export feed barley in central Saskatchewan by as much as $34.00 per tonne. Farmers are able to respond to market conditions only if the appropriate price signals are received.

    As a first step to providing these needed price signals WCE is providing weekly export price data on the Website at www.wce.ca. This price data can be used by market participants as an indication of whether they are achieving a competitive price in the domestic market or from the CWB PRO relative to the world market.

    Winnipeg Commodity Exchange Inc., established in 1887, has been facilitating futures contract trading since 1904. WCE is Canada's only agricultural futures and options exchange and North America's first fully electronic commodity exchange. WCE offers futures and options contracts on canola, domestic feed wheat, and western barley.

    For further information contact:
    Will Hill, Senior Vice President
    Winnipeg Commodity Exchange Inc.
    (204) 925-5002

    #2
    They have also developed a process for calculating Portland prices.

    http://www.wce.ca/WebContent.aspx?Web_Content_Id=528

    Comment


      #3
      Charlie,Do you think that the contract limit in the front month should be changed if we are truly an international contract. Lets face it 10,000 mt is nothing in international trade. Current front month contract is limited to contract, or 5000 mt. I realize in the past liquidity was an issue, but in the future maybe not, so why limit it. You should lobby Will Hill, a Vice President at the Wce,if you know him.

      Comment


        #4
        Don't know but can ask. Increased volume will do this contract nothing but good. Which ever way the vote goes on barley, suspect it will be used more. The CWB will (or perhaps should) be using this contract more for both feed and malt barley farmer. Have also been exploring using this as a part of the pricing process to domestic malting industry.

        Comment


          #5
          Checked WCE. Limits (250 contracts) apply when a contract actually hits a delivery month. It also only applies to spec positions only - hedge positions are not included in this number. Just there to prevent a whole lot of speculators holding into a delivery month/panicking with all the implications for volatility (not the good kind). The limit on canola is 500 contracts but indicated both levels can be reviewed based on trading levels/market needs.

          Comment


            #6
            The Leader-Post (Regina)
            2007.02.01

            CWB, Ottawa off to court

            OTTAWA -- The Canadian Wheat Board will take the Harper government to court over a cabinet order forcing it to pay the salary of the interim president the Tories appointed.

            The legal challenge to be filed within days escalates the running battle the Winnipeg-based agency is having with the federal Conservatives over the future of the world's largest wheat and barley marketer.

            The board -- now controlled by farmers opposed to Tory plans to end the CWB's monopoly powers over wheat and barley -- decided Wednesday to take its fight over Greg Arason's $30,000-a-month salary to the courts even as it agreed under protest to pay him during his 90-day appointment.

            "The court will be asked to confirm that the CWB's board of directors, not the federal government, has the authority to establish the compensation of its president and CEO," the CWB said in a statement issued on Wednesday night.

            "Further, the CWB will be seeking a decision from the court that the government's use of the (cabinet) direction order was invalid and beyond its authority."

            It is the CWB's view that under the Canadian Wheat Board Act only the board of directors has the authority to set remuneration for a CEO."

            Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl had warned he would take the CWB to court if it didn't comply with the cabinet order and on Wednesday night his office said it was glad Arason will finally be paid.

            "We are disappointed it took a (cabinet) direction order but we are glad that Mr. Arason will be compensated for his work at the wheat board," said Conrad Bellehumeur, Strahl's director of communications.

            But Bellehumeur took a different view of the court challenge.

            "That is their prerogative," he said. "We definitely see this again as a waste of farmers' money."

            Strahl named Arason interim president and CEO on Dec. 19 after he sacked Adrian Measner, who had been an outspoken critic of the Tory vision for the CWB as its president.

            Upset that Strahl did not consult with the board over the appointment, the CWB has refused to pay Arason since he started the job.

            Strahl moved last week to ensure Arason would get a paycheque by triggering the cabinet directive.

            The CWB's decision to turn to the courts comes as Prairie producers are voting in a plebiscite on whether to move to open marketing of barely.

            At the heart of the legal challenge is the question of who controls the CWB -- the federal government or Prairie producers.

            The CWB says it has a legal opinion that Strahl is overstepping his authority and will also try to ensure that the board not only determines if Arason's interim appointment is extended but also what the salary would be.

            This marks the second time the CWB has turned to the courts.

            A legal challenge mounted last year over a cabinet gag order preventing it from spending money to advocate for the retention of its monopoly powers is still pending.

            Parsly

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...