• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Canola 60 bushel swath!!!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robertbarlage
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 1242

    Canola 60 bushel swath!!!

    But going 35 !!!!! Needed less heat and more rain but it’s only our farm I am sure . 😢
  • Freightshaker
    Member
    • Jan 2020
    • 89

    #2
    Had some like that too. Could hardly put through the lexion and ran 27 bpa. Lots are disappointed with canola yields here. Is yours by chance an invigor?

    Comment

    • goalieguy847
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2017
      • 662

      #3
      Sounds like thats the case allll over the place.. last bit of flowers likely got blasted off taking 15 bushels with it. Then if it was swathed anywhere under 70% seed color change in the heat that took another 5...
      Welllll atleast the price should go up? In... may..
      But but but
      Canada ag said its gonna be a great big harvest!

      Comment

      • Robertbarlage
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 1242

        #4
        Proven 680

        Comment

        • furrowtickler
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2004
          • 21877

          #5
          Originally posted by Robertbarlage View Post
          But going 35 !!!!! Needed less heat and more rain but it’s only our farm I am sure . 😢

          Much the same east and south of here
          But the satellite pictures showed all 60 bushel canola from space the experts said so
          I guess the satellites don’t see all the blanks ….. go figure eh , who woulda thought

          Comment

          • LWeber
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2007
            • 1432

            #6
            Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
            Much the same east and south of here
            But the satellite pictures showed all 60 bushel canola from space the experts said so
            I guess the satellites don’t see all the blanks ….. go figure eh , who woulda thought

            What Satellite picture showed 60 bpa?

            Comment

            • quadtrac
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2014
              • 136

              #7
              Big swath lots of straw and running about half to maybe two thirds of what it looks like.

              Comment

              • LWeber
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2007
                • 1432

                #8
                Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
                Much the same east and south of here
                But the satellite pictures showed all 60 bushel canola from space the experts said so
                I guess the satellites don’t see all the blanks ….. go figure eh , who woulda thought
                [ATTACH]11032[/ATTACH

                In 2022 STATSCAN is Satellite based - Ag Can used 37.7 bpa for SK.

                Crop reporters say 34 bpa - Take away the drought year - crop reporters under estimate 7.7 bpa


                I eat live breathe this sh it every day. Farmers only get 50% of the information they need.
                Buyers know what acres are seeded because of sales/input sales and returns and they talk to each other.
                If any one is using the original seeded acres from STATCAN farm phone calls in March - they need their head read.

                If you plugged in 41.7 into the SK production estimates and the real seeded acres; like traders are doing - you would sh it at the number.

                For the record Furrow, I've counted kernels on wheat heads from a Satellite picture that orbits at 705 km; but no one uses that tech yet ...and i say yet...because it is coming. Today's model is vegetative health based on a program that has data back to 1987.

                How many farmers in your area under 37.7 bpa canola and how many over?
                30 and 50 is a 40 bpa average.

                I don't want to fight - take the emotion out of the equation and look at the spreadsheet i just posted...Take away the drought year and this will be the lowest canola bpa posted in 4 years... STATSCAN never called it a bumper... in fact i don't think anyone did. Not even the fat lawyer child...

                Comment

                • furrowtickler
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 21877

                  #9
                  Originally posted by LWeber View Post
                  [ATTACH]11032[/ATTACH

                  In 2022 STATSCAN is Satellite based - Ag Can used 37.7 bpa for SK.

                  Crop reporters say 34 bpa - Take away the drought year - crop reporters under estimate 7.7 bpa


                  I eat live breathe this sh it every day. Farmers only get 50% of the information they need.
                  Buyers know what acres are seeded because of sales/input sales and returns and they talk to each other.
                  If any one is using the original seeded acres from STATCAN farm phone calls in March - they need their head read.

                  If you plugged in 41.7 into the SK production estimates and the real seeded acres; like traders are doing - you would sh it at the number.

                  For the record Furrow, I've counted kernels on wheat heads from a Satellite picture that orbits at 705 km; but no one uses that tech yet ...and i say yet...because it is coming. Today's model is vegetative health based on a program that has data back to 1987.

                  How many farmers in your area under 37.7 bpa canola and how many over?
                  30 and 50 is a 40 bpa average.

                  I don't want to fight - take the emotion out of the equation and look at the spreadsheet i just posted...Take away the drought year and this will be the lowest canola bpa posted in 4 years... STATSCAN never called it a bumper... in fact i don't think anyone did. Not even the fat lawyer child...
                  Agree for sure , but many areas they thought would be great are not even close . Meota to Turtleford are very good
                  Just saying canola from road or satellite don’t see the main stem blanks like the guys in the seats
                  Yup some great areas , but dryness and heat took a huge toll satellites can’t see , yet

                  Comment

                  • furrowtickler
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 21877

                    #10
                    10-15 miles south east , 30 bus canola ((25-40)
                    Here , 35-55
                    Meota 50-60
                    All looked the same on vegetative maps end July basically

                    All look the same swath today

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...