• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Ottawa looking at a wealth tax

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jazz
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2018
    • 9308

    Ottawa looking at a wealth tax

    https://financialpost.com/opinion/jay-goldberg-ottawa-looking-at-a-wealth-tax-to-pay-for-soaring-spending

    a one-time three per cent tax on people with more than $10 million in assets, coupled with a one-time five per cent tax on people with more than $20 million in assets, would rake in $60 billion.
  • jazz
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2018
    • 9308

    #2
    Some of the even smaller farmers would probably have a net worth of $10M with the land price increases, equipment, buildings, inventory, stocks, insurance etc all re-assessed now after the inflation by our govts.

    Comment

    • Oliver88
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 4688

      #3
      3% of 10,000,000 = $300,000
      5% of 20,000,000 = $1,000,000

      The “free stuff” for Trudeau voters doesn’t pay for itself.

      Comment

      • furrowtickler
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2004
        • 21870

        #4
        They should tax off shore trust funds 50% …..

        Comment

        • furrowtickler
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2004
          • 21870

          #5
          Or how about a wealth tax on the pharmaceutical companies that just made billions off of Covid ?
          Nah that won’t happen

          Comment

          • foragefarmer
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2014
            • 3484

            #6
            Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
            They should tax off shore trust funds 50% …..

            You mean to say you haven't set one up?

            We all knew this was coming, and the next one coming up wants to use Bitcoin.

            Holy shit!

            Comment

            • jazz
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2018
              • 9308

              #7
              This appears to be a tax on individuals, not corporations. They would not after the rich Laurentian elite.

              Imagine the dairy and milk cartel might have something to say about it. Maybe some of those multiple home owners in Toronto and Vancouver. But in reality this is mostly a tax on large private land bases.

              I said before, it might be high time to transfer some land into a company just for pure protection.

              Dont have to offshore anything, use the tools we have.

              This is a budgetary item so it will need a budget resolution so 2023. Unless we can run Singh out of the country first.

              Comment

              • helmsdale
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 2127

                #8
                Originally posted by jazz View Post
                I said before, it might be high time to transfer some land into a company just for pure protection.
                Likely too late. Could be wrong here, but fairly certain you'd have to transact at fair market value to the company, and either cash or a balance owing to the shareholder would still leave you vulnerable.

                All one could do is try to "muddy the water" and make it more challenging for an audit to make sense of all the stacks of legal documents and bank statements.

                And there's the rub to implementing this whole thing... wealth taxes always look appealing as a source of untapped government revenue, but the implementation is anything but easy. CRA doesnt have enough personnel to forensically audit every single individual at tax time, let alone come to fair representations of "net wealth".

                Do they assess on appraised value? Assessed value? Market value?

                Do you allow people to "self report", and then audit only a small fraction? Arguably those with the greatest wealth would be the largest targets, but those same individuals would have the largest incentive to tie any "assessment" up in years of legal proceedings... and lord knows they'd have the financial capability to hire the best bay street lawyers.

                Do they treat liquid and illiquid assets the same? Do a pile of 2nd and 3rd houses get dumped on the market to create the liquidity necessary to pay the assessment?

                Does it simply lead to mass capital flight?

                Comment

                • jazz
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2018
                  • 9308

                  #9
                  Originally posted by helmsdale View Post
                  Does it simply lead to mass capital flight?
                  Very few businesses are like farming with heavy wealth non incorporated.

                  What other sector is as vulnerable. Smallish city businesses but I doubt they would qualify. Anybody with a sizable business has LTD. on their name by now. Doctors and Lawyers all incorporated too, but I know farmers with easy 10s of million held personally including equipment, all their main yard and inventory and investments.
                  Last edited by jazz; May 13, 2022, 12:12.

                  Comment

                  • furrowtickler
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 21870

                    #10
                    And the NDP will give its blessings to the Trudeau circus to go right after farms … just a guess

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...