Tell me what has changed

[burnt]

No I didn't tattle on you or anyone else specifically. The admin and maybe site ownersmade their choices (or didn't do much ) all by themselves. The like to this post was accidental; but maybe I won't lose any sleep over it. Maybe even a like is deserved...but I'm too busy with more important things to read that particular post just now.

That the like was accidental is no surprise.

However, I reciprocated anyway...

[jensend]

Why worry about it? The purpose of Agriville is to generate revenue for farms.com. And you can't fix stupid.

[chuckChuck]

Your last comment has no merit. Segregating based on vaccination status has no merit as well. Vaccinated can be carrier, transmitters, no different than unvaccinated, in fact possibly more likely as they won’t have symptoms to tell them to stay home.
Media pushes how effective vaccine is against delta, not do much, 39% effective according to Israel studies. As time goes by maybe you will come to understand, it’s not going away.
Vaccines are developed to stop transmission, this one is failing at the main reason vaccines are used.

Long term effects of the vaccine have yet to be seen. Ever heard of “antibody dependent reaction”?

So how does that explain that almost all of the increasing number of covid patients that are in the hospital had only one or no vaccines? Is it time to put 2 and 2 together and get 4. Or are you going to screw up again and get 5 or 22?

No vaccine is 100 % effective but the ones we got are pretty damn good at preventing infection and really fantastic at stopping people from getting really sick and going to the hospital with very low risk for most people.

Listen to Mitch! He hates democrats, put up with Trump, but loves the covid vaccine. Apparently the vaccine works just fine for die hard Republicans and freedom fighters like yourself there JWAB!

Roll'er up and get the job done. Or are you going to wait to get the delta variant and then change your mind??

[chuckChuck]

Why worry about it? The purpose of Agriville is to generate revenue for farms.com. And you can't fix stupid.

Remember Rick Mercer's show Talking to Americans where Rick would ask dumb questions with a smirk on his face and get even dumber answers from unsuspecting yanks with no clue. While Agrisilly is kind like that show sometimes, except most of the dumb ass american republican types live in Canada most of the year. Except for foghorn leghorn, who spends alot of time in his second home in Florida.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I wouldn't lose any sleep over the probable misinformation being propagated on this site.

It is the same handful of posters preaching to each other on one side, and the well intended but hapless Agstar on the other side keeping the issue alive, but doing more harm than good in the process.

It seems that everyone else has accepted reality and long since lost interest and moved on.

The unique visitors to these threads outside of the warring factions of regular contributors has likely approached zero. So their influence on popular opinion has also approached zero.

[oneoff]

Your last comment has no merit. Segregating based on vaccination status has no merit as well. Vaccinated can be carrier, transmitters, no different than unvaccinated, in fact possibly more likely as they won’t have symptoms to tell them to stay home.
Media pushes how effective vaccine is against delta, not do much, 39% effective according to Israel studies. As time goes by maybe you will come to understand, it’s not going away.
Vaccines are developed to stop transmission, this one is failing at the main reason vaccines are used.

Long term effects of the vaccine have yet to be seen. Ever heard of “antibody dependent reaction”?

I think one of Dr. Fauci's retorts to a senate session hearing questioner would be appropriate.

His retort was " You don't know what you are talking about". And shortly thereafter he added emphasis with "you don't know what you are talking about".

[Sheepwheat]

I think one of Dr. Fauci's retorts to a senate session hearing questioner would be appropriate.

His retort was " You don't know what you are talking about". And shortly thereafter he added emphasis with "you don't know what you are talking about".

You think that was effective? He was talking to a doctor. And the doctor cornered him like the slimy rat he is, so all he could do was try out an insult. He failed. Maybe try watching the whole exchange, not just the cnn version of events.

[agstar77]

Dr.Rand Paul slimy rat. You are right.

[Sheepwheat]

Dr.Rand Paul slimy rat. You are right.

Explain.

[oneoff]

You think that was effective? He was talking to a doctor. And the doctor cornered him like the slimy rat he is, so all he could do was try out an insult. He failed. Maybe try watching the whole exchange, not just the cnn version of events.

This is for you sheep.....A person saves deserved responses to suit the occasion. Rand Paul's attack on Dr. Fauci was such a situation that elicited "You don't know what you're talking about". Especially when you are talking to a professional "peer" like a "colleague" who as a "professional" "doctor" is directly addressing YOU (another doctor).

Rand Paul didn't have a suitable response. Now maybe YOU would rationalize that his time had expired ...or that Rand Paul had won the "banter". Those are childish deflections about what is really involved in Rand Pauls attack on a person's credibility.

But Rand Paul should still have a black eye from the slap down that he deservedly received.

Now Sheep and the misinformation you spout about Covid. Please tend to stick to farm animals; their care and topics that you have more knowledge than most others; and refrain from commenting repeatedly about "what you don't know what you are talking about"