• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Farmers in Canada will get no Credit for what they did to help the climate up to 2017

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blackpowder
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 9333

    #81
    No on said they wanted a dollar. Took it while there is all.
    This ain't going away.
    And I agree, we're doing nothing.
    Except the usual arguing.
    Everyone needs to ask for a refund.

    Comment

    • bucket
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 17033

      #82
      Once again , an issue that will divide farmers....and then conquer them into compliance by default..on the carbon issue.

      Typical government strategy of any stripe....look back in history at the elimination of the CWB..divided by the elimination of it,,,.then we were conquered by not being given transparency in the market...statscan is going back 5 phucking years to straighten out the numbers FFS....how much has the wrong numbers cost farmers.

      Then farmers went on a bin building binge. Farmers played right into Ritz's masters plan...storage costs downloaded to farmers.
      Last edited by bucket; Mar 10, 2021, 09:15.

      Comment

      • blackpowder
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 9333

        #83
        I usually agree with most stuff.
        But not the bin building theory.

        Comment

        • AlbertaFarmer5
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 12563

          #84
          Anyone who thinks it is a good idea to get into bed with the science deniers like Chuck, needs to spend a few minutes reading his NFU website.

          The supposed farmers in the NFU are also campaigning for eliminating fertilizer ( because climate change), all petrochemical inputs( because climate change), attacks on livestock ( because climate change) etc etc. This is the slippery slope we would be signing up for if we ignore the science and lobby for a few pennies for sequestering CO2.

          Comment

          • blackpowder
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 9333

            #85
            Fair point. What are we giving in return. We can't do nothing. But I believe we never ask for a fair exchange.
            Social license for market access my foot.

            Comment

            • bucket
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 17033

              #86
              Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
              I usually agree with most stuff.
              But not the bin building theory.
              Maybe it's just in this area...but when they closed Eyebrow as an example ...bins had to be built to offset the thousands of tonnes that couldn't make it from field to elevator anymore..three loads off the field is a 5000 bushel bin...

              Then by extension the other elevators within a 45 mile range started backing up as well ...

              A 10000 tonne elevator is 60-80000 tonnes that have to find a new home.

              Comment

              • blackpowder
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 9333

                #87
                We've exchanged opinions on this before therefore, respectfully I wont try to change your mind.

                Comment

                • bucket
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 17033

                  #88
                  Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                  We've exchanged opinions on this before therefore, respectfully I wont try to change your mind.
                  Location does make a difference into opinion. So does a elevator manager's attitude if they can remain open...

                  Good discussions always need opposing views...otherwise it's called cheerleading.

                  And from what I see from farm groups is a lot of cheerleading without much thought for the average farmer.
                  Last edited by bucket; Mar 10, 2021, 11:12.

                  Comment

                  • AlbertaFarmer5
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 12563

                    #89
                    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                    SF, just try to explain how carbon emissions don't cause climate change, but you still want to be paid well for capturing carbon? What do you think the reason is for paying carbon credits to farmers?
                    Chuck discovers hypocrisy. Good job. Now go back and read most your own posts and see if you can recognize the constant examples.

                    Comment

                    • SASKFARMER
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 7029

                      #90
                      Guys like chuck sooner or later fall into the pile of shit.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...