Once we progress from thinking that intermittent energy sources are going to power modern civilizations, and move onto practical technologies, I still see intermittents being used for creating energy intensive storable products such as fertilizers.
But, as for fuels, the efficiency is so awful, that is seems like an unlikely avenue.
https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/h2-and-nh3-the-perfect-marriage-in-a-carbon-free-society/#:~:text=Currently%2C%20the%20round%2Dtrip%20effic iency,of%209%2D22%10. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/h2-and-nh3-the-perfect-marriage-in-a-carbon-free-society/#:~:text=Currently%2C%20the%20round%2Dtrip%20effic iency,of%209%2D22%10.
There is such a thing as EROEI. Wind and solar have such low EROEI's to start with that they can't compete as is, now cut that back by 5 to 10 times when trying to store and transport using ammonia or liquid hydrogen.
But, as for fuels, the efficiency is so awful, that is seems like an unlikely avenue.
Currently, the round-trip efficiency of liquid ammonia is 11-19%, which is similar to the values of liquid hydrogen of 9-22%
There is such a thing as EROEI. Wind and solar have such low EROEI's to start with that they can't compete as is, now cut that back by 5 to 10 times when trying to store and transport using ammonia or liquid hydrogen.
Comment