• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is APAS representing secondary industries at committee????

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    ......its read.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by bucket View Post
      Seems odd that APAS is actively lobbying for secondary industries like processors....have you ever seen graincos or meat packers lobby for farmers in front of an ag committee ?????

      Using farmers lobbying resources which are being used to help industries that can extract profit from consumers or end users seems really stupid because none of the profit comes back to the farm gate...

      I think people can see why farmers are irritated with our farm groups representing the wrong policy or group...using farmers money...

      Every time there is an announcement using government money they always say how it will help farmers ....it just is not happening....

      Protein Industries Canada always says there announcements will help farmers .....2/10ths of rain has done more good...

      PIC hasn't created one BPA demand for pulses with hundreds of millions of dollars handed out...do the math...


      BTW secondary industries have their own lobbyists and connections in government...
      Question for you Bucket.
      I would agree that as farmers in western Canada we have far less support from govt than most of our competitors and what supply management receives. You have distain for literally all commodity groups, APAS and any elected govt, municipal , provincial or federal. I have tried to get to crop week in Saskatoon most years and spend a day or two going to the annual meetings and talking to elected farmer board members. It always struck me of the passion they had to improve the lot of whatever crop they represented. Our local rm are members of APAS. I admit in their early years I didn't have a lot of good to say about APAS but feel they have matured in more recent years. I haven't gone to many of their meetings but follow what they are doing online and through their magazine. If I had a real beef I could get involved as they are always looking for reps it seems at times.
      From what I understand a high percentage of the provincial ag expenditure goes into crop insurance and the other support programs. For myself I would say that a real beef for me is the fact that the Ag stability program is a joke, we are losing much of the govt investment in plant breeding and poor handling of trade relationships with our trading partners has cost us dearly and the ongoing trade issues will continue to cause us problems. That being said as most western Canadian farmers, we are on our own we have had to be and nimble and efficient as we can be. It is not easy trying to find cheap land as most farmers are looking for more and many are willing to push the price up to get it. That tells me many farmers see a future.
      Back to my question , What do you want?

      Comment


        #13
        The federal government just made a SM announcement to an industry that has a formula that allows for indexing of costs to milk production....its the backbone of agriculture is what Bibeau said...


        Maybe farm groups are not listening to what is said or are too stupid to respond to that insult?

        Look at how quick programs were put in place for the pandemic issues...federally they have spent 400 billion to help out joe six pack....

        Farmers cant get a matching response to what the American government has done for their farmers in the form of direct payment in the last 5 years....

        So is anyone really paying attention when our prices are set from a distorted market in the states????

        The other problem is that farmers can't just go an off farm job in the current situation to help offset losses as there are no jobs...

        If you are farmer that left 50 percent of his crop out in 2019...which agristabilty counts as inventory...there is no help for 2020 because you have moved your income to another year...

        Tell your kids that if BSE hits or you leave a crop out ....there won't be help....ask them if they want to risk 25 years of working for that eventual outcome.....

        It won't bring young people to that industry when they can go work and have the government more than willing to pay them to sit on their ass...
        Last edited by bucket; Nov 30, 2020, 09:15.

        Comment


          #14
          I don't know of many farmers that receive government help through an ad hoc payment that sit on their ass not trying to make a go of it...

          There are a few ....but not many...

          Comment


            #15
            I went to the AGM's last year...the directors have their own agenda and only try to talk you into that narrative. ...

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by bucket View Post
              Tool Lewis was talking about a better transportation system.....I thought they were doing this since the events of 2013....same shit going on today...40 vessels out at the west coast ...but it doesnt matter because they are doing the best they can until the winter weather hits...

              No one correlates the fact with good weather they are still not keeping up to the production and export demands ...

              Walk into an elevator to deliver and they say they are working on October and November contracts....JFC....its been years to get this shit figured out how to move a 75 mmt crop....


              And then to have guys sit there in front of the ag committee and say the same phucking things they did 8 years ago about transportation....and lobby for them????????
              Cargil was bring in dec contracts in early nov to fill the nov train. Makes me think they will be short for dec. they are pricing out for feb. they are tryn to make it look like there is only so much they will buy at a certain price.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by TASFarms View Post
                Cargil was bring in dec contracts in early nov to fill the nov train. Makes me think they will be short for dec. they are pricing out for feb. they are tryn to make it look like there is only so much they will buy at a certain price.
                And yet we are hearing complaints from farmer orgs that the Railways are way behind on shipments. Something doesn't add up. AG transportation Coalition says CN is behind at least.

                Comment


                  #18
                  To date there should be zero excuses for being behind ...from railways or grain cos other than their own lack of planning...or lack of infrastructure upgrades..

                  If 2013 happens again are farmers going to pick up the bill again?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by bucket View Post
                    To date there should be zero excuses for being behind ...from railways or grain cos other than their own lack of planning...or lack of infrastructure upgrades..

                    If 2013 happens again are farmers going to pick up the bill again?
                    That is why I don't understand is the RR really behind or is the whole system of reporting screwed up to make the other guy look bad?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by wmoebis View Post
                      That is why I don't understand is the RR really behind or is the whole system of reporting screwed up to make the other guy look bad?
                      Don't matter....we all know who eventually gets the bill?

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...