What will we do for Carbon , for life and plant growth?

[tweety]

Who is we, and how do we know it won't go down?

Everyone not on Agriville apparently. Because gases don't magically disappear.

You've been asking the whole thread how will we grow anything in a low C02 environment assuming it will drop dramatically, but even with the simplest basic understanding of gases you know that gases don't just disappear just because you stop adding them. Does the planet have a CO2 leak only you know about?

The effects of the last century of industrialization will last thousands of years in the oceans in the form of acidity and in the atmosphere as greenhouse gases.

[Oliver88]

i still wanna see your solar panels ?
went by yesterday , are they hidden , behind the bush maybe ? , guess i shoulda came in ?

Maybe there was a hail storm this year for Chuck? It appears greenies do their goose hunting slightly different as well.



This is how Ryan Meilli, NDP, NFU wanted to create all of our power and raise our rates!

Who is we, and how do we know it won't go down?
I've spent this entire thread trying to get an answer to this very question, it is fundamental to the entire CAGW argument, and to the models.

What is your credible source for the millenia or more? Chuck started the thread claiming thousands of years, but could find no evidence of that, one of his go to sources claims it could be as low as single digits, now after all the effort we put into it, you start over at the same place.

we is the cult and its Sheeple

[burnt]

Just a Reminder. Carbon tax is a wealth transfer scam. Nothing more.

What is totally despicable is how (farm) organizations that are supposed to represent our interests are fully involved to the scam, using its language, working with its falsehoods, giving it another layer of false legitimacy.

[TASFarms]

Just a Reminder. Carbon tax is a wealth transfer scam. Nothing more.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

We do know, it won't go down. The carbon tax is an incentive to not compound the problem. At least in theory, or rather the hope. But the problem to date of CO2 levels will remain for a millennia or more.

Who is we, and how do we know it won't go down?
I've spent this entire thread trying to get an answer to this very question, it is fundamental to the entire CAGW argument, and to the models.

What is your credible source for the millenia or more? Chuck started the thread claiming thousands of years, but could find no evidence of that, one of his go to sources claims it could be as low as single digits, now after all the effort we put into it, you start over at the same place.

[furrowtickler]

We do know, it won't go down. The carbon tax is an incentive to not compound the problem. At least in theory, or rather the hope. But the problem to date of CO2 levels will remain for a millennia or more.

Tax a theory based on hope ?
Don’t worry we will plant more trees and the CO2 will come down , unless we use them all for wood pallets .. then we in trouble

[tweety]

Best point I have heard ....... so why the carbon tax if we don’t know ?
Tax on a speculation is not right .

We do know, it won't go down. The carbon tax is an incentive to not compound the problem. At least in theory, or rather the hope. But the problem to date of CO2 levels will remain for a millennia or more.

[furrowtickler]

What makes you think that once fossil fuels are no longer used that CO2 concentration would drop?

Best point I have heard ....... so why the carbon tax if we don’t know ?
Tax on a speculation is not right .

[tweety]

Here is someone offering a solution:

What makes you think that once fossil fuels are no longer used that CO2 concentration would drop?