• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What will we do for Carbon , for life and plant growth?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tweety
    replied
    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    Your circular reasoning is keeping you from addressing the actual question.

    Your thousands of years number is orders ( with an s) of magnitude too high. If this were an issue thousands of years from now, it would not be an issue, because we will have exhausted nearly every other resource long before that.

    This is a much more immediate problem IF, the hairbrained politicians, inept UN bureaucrats, and mathematically challenged green movements actually succeed against all odds to "decarbonize" within a couple of decades.

    If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it, to alleviate my concerns.
    Seriously, where will the release of stored CO2 from trillions of barrels of oil released over the last 100 years magically disappear to?

    Leave a comment:


  • burnt
    replied
    Originally posted by caseih View Post
    they use all the catchphrases , its in the leftard bible ; "systemic racism" , "flat earthers" , "the science is settled" , the list can go on and on
    and they're all too stupid to realize theyre are in a cult
    They come by that characteristic honestly - statistics show that one out of three Liberals is as stupid as the other two.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jay-mo
    replied
    Originally posted by caseih View Post
    and the 50% renewalables will be 49% hydro
    Yep, MB Hydro is currently building a transmission line to Saskatchewan to triple their supply of hydro power.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by tweety View Post
    Over thousands of years. You really want to talk about the challenges of food production in a low CO2 environment thousands of years from now?
    Your circular reasoning is keeping you from addressing the actual question.

    Your thousands of years number is orders ( with an s) of magnitude too high. If this were an issue thousands of years from now, it would not be an issue, because we will have exhausted nearly every other resource long before that.

    This is a much more immediate problem IF, the hairbrained politicians, inept UN bureaucrats, and mathematically challenged green movements actually succeed against all odds to "decarbonize" within a couple of decades.

    If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it, to alleviate my concerns.
    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Oct 30, 2020, 09:14.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by burnt View Post
    What is totally despicable is how (farm) organizations that are supposed to represent our interests are fully involved to the scam, using its language, working with its falsehoods, giving it another layer of false legitimacy.
    they use all the catchphrases , its in the leftard bible ; "systemic racism" , "flat earthers" , "the science is settled" , the list can go on and on
    and they're all too stupid to realize theyre are in a cult

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    A5 has no science to back up his opinions and gets distracted easily by irrelevant issues.

    But don't let that stop you from bring up wacky theories and using the flat earth scientific method! LOL

    Scott Moe and Saskpower are installing lots of wind power in Saskatchewan. 50% renewablse by 2030.

    Oly, you better call them up and tell them they are killing all the geese that are eating your crop. Along with all the powerlines, vehicles and windows that kill many many many birds every year. No mention of those?

    And large hail stones only hit solar panels! hahaaha If the hail stones are so big as the ones that caused the damage to the solar panels in the photo, your roof and windows, siding, vehicles will be done too. So should we stop using roofs too because of hail! LMAO
    and the 50% renewalables will be 49% hydro

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Oliver88 View Post
    [ATTACH]6898[/ATTACH]
    Maybe there was a hail storm this year for Chuck? It appears greenies do their goose hunting slightly different as well.

    [ATTACH]6897[/ATTACH]

    This is how Ryan Meilli, NDP, NFU wanted to create all of our power and raise our rates!
    And half a million or so geese are taken by recreational hunters per year. Nice like WasteIH
    Inconvenient truth. Damn details eh. Smash your keyboard and suck your thumb

    Leave a comment:


  • chuckChuck
    replied
    A5 has no science to back up his opinions and gets distracted easily by irrelevant issues.

    But don't let that stop you from bring up wacky theories and using the flat earth scientific method! LOL

    Scott Moe and Saskpower are installing lots of wind power in Saskatchewan. 50% renewablse by 2030.

    Oly, you better call them up and tell them they are killing all the geese that are eating your crop. Along with all the powerlines, vehicles and windows that kill many many many birds every year. No mention of those?

    And large hail stones only hit solar panels! hahaaha If the hail stones are so big as the ones that caused the damage to the solar panels in the photo, your roof and windows, siding, vehicles will be done too. So should we stop using roofs too because of hail! LMAO

    Leave a comment:


  • tweety
    replied
    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    The leak is called sequestration. It is why limestone exists in gargantuan quantities.

    Please provide a source for your claim. They run counter to all current scientific literature, even by the alarmists, even Chuck backed down from such a preposterous claim.
    Over thousands of years. You really want to talk about the challenges of food production in a low CO2 environment thousands of years from now?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by tweety View Post
    Everyone not on Agriville apparently. Because gases don't magically disappear.

    You've been asking the whole thread how will we grow anything in a low C02 environment assuming it will drop dramatically, but even with the simplest basic understanding of gases you know that gases don't just disappear just because you stop adding them. Does the planet have a CO2 leak only you know about?

    The effects of the last century of industrialization will last thousands of years in the oceans in the form of acidity and in the atmosphere as greenhouse gases.
    The leak is called sequestration. It is why limestone exists in gargantuan quantities.

    Please provide a source for your claim. They run counter to all current scientific literature, even by the alarmists, even Chuck backed down from such a preposterous claim.

    Leave a comment:

  • Reply to this Thread
  • Return to Topic List
Working...