Expectation of anonymity on a public forum.

[malleefarmer]

Confused who got outed glen or Kyle?

[sumdumguy]

Who blew his cover?

[the big wheel]

Who blew his cover?

Phukin WHO can’t even get anything right.

[GDR]

GDR, I always appreciate what you have to say when you post. Always polite, informed and considerate, so I value you weighing in here.

But back to my original question, does that right extend to public figures?

If your MP joined Agriville(or any other social media, with somewhat wider appeal) during an election campaign under a false identity, to campaign for him/herself, and sling mud at the competitors, spreading lies, then deny their true identity when confronted, how would the voters respond? To me, that isn't the type of ethics and morals I expect in an elected official. This is really no different, this poster has been using this as a pulpit to preach the gospel of the CWB, while denigrating his opponents while denying his actual identity.

Is it a right? Probably, if one person is able to be anonymous why should that be denied to someone else?

Is it respectable in a public figure/ current election or public service position? Absolutely not. If you ain't got the balls to stand behind what you say you wouldnt have my vote.

In your example, all as I got to say is I dont plan on voting in any upcoming cwb elections, do you? Move on, maybe that applies to others as well, CWB is gone, not sure we all agree on wether what we got is any better but I'm sure we ain't going back so let's talk about the future instead.

[Zephyr]

Nobody gets paid to post on a forum.

The conspiracy wingnut bullshit is getting too much on here.

[farmaholic]

Nobody gets paid to post on a forum.

The conspiracy wingnut bullshit is getting too much on here.

....like chukChuck bio-engineered Covid19 as a bio-weapon so the socialists can enact near martial law and seize power of the world.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Nobody gets paid to post on a forum.

The conspiracy wingnut bullshit is getting too much on here.

Farmaholic, Apparently it is now required to use the
* denotes sarcasm
On every sarcastic post, sorry for the confusion.

Although, you might be onto something...

[BreadWinner]

Don’t blame AF5. I spilled the beans, he filled in the blanks.😎 good riddance. Thank AF5

[chuckChuck]

Sorry to disappoint you all. I am not a former CWB director. But its been fun to read all the asinine speculation. LMAO

I know you really don't want to listen to anybody outside of your clique of the like minded.

But you really have to be frail minded and sheltered to believe that all farmers share your particular point of views. Trying to get farmers to agree on anything is like herding cats.

Perhaps some of you guys need to get out a bit more and try to turn down the volume on the echo chamber.

If you are going to dish out the personal attacks then don't expect kid gloves in return.

Try to focus on the issue not the poster and present some facts and evidence to back up your position.
If you disagree with a post then explain why. If that is too difficult then don't say anything or stay off of Agriville.

There are several moderate posters that do a good job of presenting arguments without resorting to name calling and endless partisan rhetoric. Try to follow their examples.

Happy debating everyone and stay safe!

[farming101]

HI Chuck, thanks I had all but given up on getting a reply to my questions from 4 months ago.

Dig it up and please PM me. I do not want to bog down the forum with an old discussion.
I continue to patiently wait....

[bucket]

I must of missed the “call out”. Did Kyle have a problem with it? I know I’ve been called out by my name at least 5 times on different threads over the years. Who cares? Not even worth worrying if Kyle or anyone on here has a problem with it. If you do take a hike. Zero expectation for anyone to have anonymity on a public forum

I do know one thing....if you put all the posters here in a room ....there would be an excellent group of farm ideas and a good representation of farm views that any politician would be scared to debate their logic once a consensus was made...

It takes all kinds...

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Perhaps some of you guys need to get out a bit more and try to turn down the volume on the echo chamber.

If you are going to dish out the personal attacks then don't expect kid gloves in return.

Try to focus on the issue not the poster and present some facts and evidence to back up your position.
If you disagree with a post then explain why. If that is too difficult then don't say anything or stay off of Agriville.

There are several moderate posters that do a good job of presenting arguments without resorting to name calling and endless partisan rhetoric. Try to follow their examples.

Happy debating everyone and stay safe!

Excellent advice, thanks. As I said, every poster has something valuable to contribute at times. I trust no one will redirect this back at you in future dealings.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Well since Chuck isn't the same guy that his CWB colleague, Forage farmer came out to defend, then obviously this entire thread is much ado about nothing, and we can all move on.

However in the interest of consensus, I do recommend that next time you guys might want to coordinate your responses first.
Edit, this was meant as sarcasm.

[malleefarmer]

Well since Chuck isn't the same guy that his CWB colleague, Forage farmer came out to defend, then obviously this entire thread is much ado about nothing, and we can all move on.

However in the interest of consensus, I do recommend that next time you guys might want to coordinate your responses first.

From a million miles away I could see your barking up the wrong tree.

[Guest]

yes needed to be looking in the NW part of Sask , not East central
actually Mallee , i checked and it is 9051 miles as the crow flies , from my house to yours !