Take your climate change and....

[jazz]

You know the rest.

- Polar bears now stranded on increasing Arctic ice pack
- snowiest Feb on record in parts of US
- 2 scientist deniers
- no studies linking Aus bushfires to climate change
- UNs own modelling of a net zero policy (ie economic shutdown, no FF) shows no effect on earths temperature.

[fjlip]

Love it! Thanks jazz...

[dmlfarmer]

You know the rest.


- no studies linking Aus bushfires to climate change

Another statement by Jazz that is BS. Here is a scientific study by 13 scientiests that links the Aus bushfires to climate change

https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/WWA-attribution_bushfires-March2020.pdf https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/WWA-attribution_bushfires-March2020.pdf

Second, the snowiest feb in parts of the US is not proof climate change is not happening. As been pointed out numerous times, that is weather not climate.

[Hamloc]

Another statement by Jazz that is BS. Here is a scientific study by 13 scientiests that links the Aus bushfires to climate change

https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/WWA-attribution_bushfires-March2020.pdf https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/WWA-attribution_bushfires-March2020.pdf

Second, the snowiest feb in parts of the US is not proof climate change is not happening. As been pointed out numerous times, that is weather not climate.

On CBC Dml:"Racers rehash hallucinations, challenges during the coldest Ultra to date." I was somewhat amused as there are usually 3 main themes on CBC, LGTBQ, indigenous and climate change with a little real news thrown in. I was amazed they would publish a story that acknowledged it actually still gets cold on occasion in the north. Now I will have no doubt you will point out this race has only run for 10 years so it is only weather but if the opposite had occurred and it was the warmest race they would be screaming climate change climate change!!!!!

[furrowtickler]

Another statement by Jazz that is BS. Here is a scientific study by 13 scientiests that links the Aus bushfires to climate change

https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/WWA-attribution_bushfires-March2020.pdf https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/wp-content/uploads/WWA-attribution_bushfires-March2020.pdf

Second, the snowiest feb in parts of the US is not proof climate change is not happening. As been pointed out numerous times, that is weather not climate.

Lol , pick and choose.

[FarmJunkie]

Only climate change I’d worry about is if the sun blew up.

[burnt]

There is no new thing under the sun.

Evidence that the Dutch sailed their wooden ships within an eyelash of the North Pole in the 17th century.

https://electroverse.net/did-dutch-ships-reach-the-89th-latitude-in-1665-and-1675/ https://electroverse.net/did-dutch-ships-reach-the-89th-latitude-in-1665-and-1675/

The scientists of the time, being alarmed at the warm temperatures that threatened the very existence of the polar bears, imposed a wooden tax...j/k.

An interesting twitter feed - https://twitter.com/Harry_Hardrada https://twitter.com/Harry_Hardrada

[jazz]

Second, the snowiest feb in parts of the US is not proof climate change is not happening. As been pointed out numerous times, that is weather not climate.

Fine I will accept that definition when the Gore and IPCC and UN and others drop their claim of a future without snow. They made it, how else can I refute it but to show its still fing snowing 20 yrs later.

Not to mention the arctic ice pack being gone.

I think its the other side that has the problem with definitions.

[dmlfarmer]

Lol , pick and choose.

Let me get this straight. You accuse me of picking and choosing because I point out a statement Jazz makes that is BS. He claims there is no study and I provide a link to an actual scientific paper and you laugh at me and accuse me of picking and choosing? So you think it is okay to public claim something that is false and to laugh at a person who points out the BS?

So if a salesman comes to your yard and makes a whole bunch of statements, at least one that you know is wrong, do you not question the rest of the statements he makes? Or you happy to buy his bullshit?

[fjlip]

"So if a salesman comes to your yard and makes a whole bunch of statements, at least one that you know is wrong, do you not question the rest of the statements he makes?"

That would be every Climate Zealot...except MOST statements/claims have been debunked, or never came to pass, so the rest of the claims we rightly assume are total f*cking BULLSHIT!