• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

The C02 reality ...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • furrowtickler
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2004
    • 21856

    The C02 reality ...

  • TOM4CWB
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2000
    • 16511

    #2
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    "Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions currently represent about 1.6 percent of the global total."
    https://www.google.ca/search?q=canada%27s+carbon+emissions+compared+to+t he+world&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjuruqP6-nnAhVxCTQIHX11DMAQ1QIoAXoECAoQAg&biw=1020&bih=528

    The: USA, China, India, South America, Mexico, Russia, Middle eastern region...the vast majority of the world has no carbon tax... further the carbon tax on Canadian consumers/Agriculture... does not reduce CO2 production... primarily it is a pay to emit scheme...energy in a cold climate... is required for survival. Kind of like needing to breathe to live.
    Last edited by TOM4CWB; Feb 24, 2020, 03:32.

    Comment

    • Herc
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2017
      • 772

      #3
      Originally posted by TOM4CWB View Post
      Kind of like needing to breathe to live.
      Don’t worry if they could find a way to tax the oxygen you breath they probably would......

      Comment

      • bucket
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 17021

        #4
        Originally posted by Herc View Post
        Don’t worry if they could find a way to tax the oxygen you breath they probably would......
        Seeing as C02 is partly oxygen....it looks like they have .

        C02 feeds plants which make oxygen....

        But what do I know....

        Comment

        • chuckChuck
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2006
          • 12722

          #5
          Same thing could be said about ozone depleting chemicals - Canada's share is too small and not the problem. But Mulroney pushed ahead and helped ban the worst ozone depleting chemicals under the Montreal accord.

          Comment

          • sumdumguy
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 11967

            #6
            But he didn’t kill the Canadian economy at the same time.

            Comment

            • Guest

              #7
              [QUOTE=chuckChuck;441877]Same thing could be said about ozone depleting chemicals - Canada's share is too small and not the problem. But Mulroney pushed ahead and helped ban the worst ozone depleting chemicals under the Montreal accord.[/QUOTE
              JHC. Now you’re onto mulroney

              Comment

              • AlbertaFarmer5
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2010
                • 12482

                #8
                Originally posted by TOM4CWB View Post
                "Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions currently represent about 1.6 percent of the global total."
                https://www.google.ca/search?q=canada%27s+carbon+emissions+compared+to+t he+world&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjuruqP6-nnAhVxCTQIHX11DMAQ1QIoAXoECAoQAg&biw=1020&bih=528

                The: USA, China, India, South America, Mexico, Russia, Middle eastern region...the vast majority of the world has no carbon tax... further the carbon tax on Canadian consumers/Agriculture... does not reduce CO2 production... primarily it is a pay to emit scheme...energy in a cold climate... is required for survival. Kind of like needing to breathe to live.
                It's even worse than that, it forces industry from the artificially high costs countries, into the low cost( and low regulation) countries, making the net environmental impact even worse than if it had remained where it started.

                Comment

                • fjlip
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 9791

                  #9
                  Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
                  Ask the same CULT Who the f*ck wants it COLDER? To reduce food supply? To increase heating/transportation cost? To reduce their billions with TAXES?

                  Agree, we should NOT be vilified with a per person C02 %, in such a COLD, empty country, with vast miles to drive/haul, and needing to HEAT homes/businesses over half the year!

                  Comment

                  • bobofthenorth
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 517

                    #10
                    They decided to call it a carbon tax because License to Pollute just didn't have the same ring to it.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...