Subsidizing Climate Change

[fjlip]

F*CK wind and solar BULLSHIT, US will cut them off the public TIT, then see if the crap can float... unless Climate Scaremonger Dumocrats get elected!

I like this reality check website!

https://abruptearthchanges.com/2019/12/27/u-s-congress-abolishes-subsidies-for-wind-solar-energy-reality-trumps-ideology/ https://abruptearthchanges.com/2019/12/27/u-s-congress-abolishes-subsidies-for-wind-solar-energy-reality-trumps-ideology/

what a waste of money renewable energy is not just $$$ but resources, time, and wasted efforts that could be used else where to society's betterment!

[burnt]

"Climate policies aren't about controlling the climate, they're about controlling you."

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1210550241038143488 https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1210550241038143488

[chuckChuck]

From Hamloc
"Also interesting that German and Dainish citizens pay twice as much as Ontario for power. These two countries are always held up as successful examples of renewable energy. This article certainly shows what a waste of money renewable energy is and how it pushes up the cost of electricity!!!!"


Hamloc I didn't know you were into sweeping generalizations. I thought only A5 was prone to this failure of intellectual capacity!

Did you forget that Quebec and Manitoba have some of the cheapest renewable electricity in North America with their large hydro resources?

Did you not read the posts from Bloomberg and the International Energy Agency analysis and forecasts on renewables?

Prices are higher for electricity in Boston, New York, Chicago, and Detrot as well. Can't blame renewables for that can we! LOL

https://www.hydroquebec.com/data/documents-donnees/pdf/comparison-electricity-prices.pdf https://www.hydroquebec.com/data/documents-donnees/pdf/comparison-electricity-prices.pdf

Germany and Denmark have always had higher electricity prices than Canadians before renewables became a factor. So try comparing apples to apples. You don't think there might be other factors at play?

[furrowtickler]

"Climate policies aren't about controlling the climate, they're about controlling you."

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1210550241038143488 https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1210550241038143488

It’s all in the UN 2030 documents .... along with getting rid of private land ownership...... through climate catastrophism .... let that sink in as Canada is headfirst up the UN’s ass.
As most farmers are landowners ... this should be of grave concern , and is the number one reason I oppose this whole UN agenda starting with carbon tax because it’s just the beginning of the UN wealth distribution plan. Land and private property is next on the agenda.

[Hamloc]

From Hamloc
"Also interesting that German and Dainish citizens pay twice as much as Ontario for power. These two countries are always held up as successful examples of renewable energy. This article certainly shows what a waste of money renewable energy is and how it pushes up the cost of electricity!!!!"


Hamloc I didn't know you were into sweeping generalizations. I thought only A5 was prone to this failure of intellectual capacity!

Did you forget that Quebec and Manitoba have some of the cheapest renewable electricity in North America with their large hydro resources?

Did you not read the posts from Bloomberg and the International Energy Agency analysis and forecasts on renewables?

Prices are higher for electricity in Boston, New York, Chicago, and Detrot as well. Can't blame renewables for that can we! LOL

https://www.hydroquebec.com/data/documents-donnees/pdf/comparison-electricity-prices.pdf https://www.hydroquebec.com/data/documents-donnees/pdf/comparison-electricity-prices.pdf

Germany and Denmark have always had higher electricity prices than Canadians before renewables became a factor. So try comparing apples to apples. You don't think there might be other factors at play?

According to Wikipedia in 2015 42.1% of Denmark's electricity came from wind generation. You continue to use projections of how cheap wind and solar are but your projections don't agree with examples of existing installations. As for hydroelectric generation I have never said it wasn't a viable method of electrical generation but you need the water resources combined with the right topography.