Climate Change Australia

[Guest]

Wow that satellite data from the 1800s is impressive and especially the rise in seas level before the car was invented and mass produced.

Got any satellite data from the 1600s, or 500BC or 1M BC?

When were the photos taken cricket, sorry I mean jazz.
During high or low tide?

[jazz]

When were the photos taken cricket, sorry I mean jazz.
During high or low tide?

Looks to be about mid day in all the photos.

Are the tides forcing anyone off the coasts because that's a daily rise in sea level. People don't seem to worried about a meter rise every day, seems they wont mind a few mm rise every century.

[chuckChuck]

Photos taken of beaches at midday are irrelevant to the science of rising sea level. Its a small amount of rise over a long period unless we get into a tipping point of a strong positive feed back which can cause relatively rapid catastrophic sea level rise.

Scientists are already very concerned about potential tipping points that will lead to rapid large rises.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year.

Chuck, I thought you said there was a consensus, and that the science was settled? Your number works out to 12.5" per century.

Yet Austranada above claims it is less than 1/3 of that rate:

Actual mean sea level rise is 4 inches in the last century

Austranada has been coming to your defense on multiple occasions, and as thanks you go and contradict him, you guys really need to get your story straight before you post.

[jazz]

Scientists are already very concerned about potential tipping points that will lead to rapid large rises.

And they are concerned where they will get their next meal ticket to fund their mouse studies now that exactly NONE of their climate predictions have come to pass. Better discount the data on the ground and talk up a scary possible future to get those bucks rolling in again. Dispatch Greta.

[chuckChuck]

Chuck, I thought you said there was a consensus, and that the science was settled? Your number works out to 12.5" per century.

Yet Austranada above claims it is less than 1/3 of that rate:



Austranada has been coming to your defense on multiple occasions, and as thanks you go and contradict him, you guys really need to get your story straight before you post.

"Sea level rise at specific locations may be more or less than the global average due to local factors such as land subsidence from natural processes and withdrawal of groundwater and fossil fuels, changes in regional ocean currents, and whether the land is still rebounding from the compressive weight of Ice Age glaciers. In urban settings, rising seas threaten infrastructure necessary for local jobs and regional industries. Roads, bridges, subways, water supplies, oil and gas wells, power plants, sewage treatment plants, landfills—virtually all human infrastructure—is at risk from sea level rise."

I don't see Austranada's post. What data source is he using?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Jazz if you want to see what increased c02 does look to the Oceans. the acidification kills Coral, most great reefs are dying to the increase in carbon dioxide that acidifies and makes any shell building near impossible
Oh by the way we humans won’t be here long if we Kill off the oceans

Actually, that myth has been debunked as well. Whistle blowers like Dr. Peter Ridd (who recently won his court case on the issue), and Dr. Jennifer Marohasy are exposing the corruption and the true state of the health of the great barrier reef.

Lots of articles and links to papers on coral reefs on this page:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/?s=coral https://wattsupwiththat.com/?s=coral

[chuckChuck]

Actually, that myth has been debunked as well. Whistle blowers like Dr. Peter Ridd (who recently won his court case on the issue), and Dr. Jennifer Marohasy are exposing the corruption and the true state of the health of the great barrier reef.

Lots of articles and links to papers on coral reefs on this page:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/?s=coral https://wattsupwiththat.com/?s=coral

Trust you to use a climate change denial site as your source of information! Can't find independent science to back up your claims?

[furrowtickler]

"Sea level rise at specific locations may be more or less than the global average due to local factors such as land subsidence from natural processes and withdrawal of groundwater and fossil fuels, changes in regional ocean currents, and whether the land is still rebounding from the compressive weight of Ice Age glaciers. In urban settings, rising seas threaten infrastructure necessary for local jobs and regional industries. Roads, bridges, subways, water supplies, oil and gas wells, power plants, sewage treatment plants, landfills—virtually all human infrastructure—is at risk from sea level rise."

You should have advised Obama on that before he closed the deal on Martha Vineyard... B.O. should have known better being a globalist warmer activist. His new pad will be under water soon lol

[jazz]

"Sea level rise at specific locations may be more or less than the global average due to local factors such as land subsidence from natural processes and withdrawal of groundwater and fossil fuels, changes in regional ocean currents, and whether the land is still rebounding from the compressive weight of Ice Age glaciers. In urban settings, rising seas threaten infrastructure necessary for local jobs and regional industries. Roads, bridges, subways, water supplies, oil and gas wells, power plants, sewage treatment plants, landfills—virtually all human infrastructure—is at risk from sea level rise."

Do you even engage your head before you post? What nonsense.

For that anything even remotely like that scenario to happen every bit of ice on the planet would have to melt in rapid fashion and that means Greenland and Antarctica at the same time. You would need a year round temperature near zero in each of those areas to get that, otherwise winter accumulations of ice would offset some of the melting and it would take longer.

Greenland has NO sunlight for almost 6 months of the year, same as Antarctica. The average temperatures in each at those periods is -40deg.

You would need more than 20deg of warming to make a dent in those places. Even if that happened, it would take hundreds of years to melt. More than enough time to move a few million people a couple miles inland. 10 times that migrate from rural to cities now. Without direct sunlight on them, these two continents can NEVER melt.

Good god man, anything upstairs at all? Like no critical thinking at all? How did you get this far in life?