Hemispherical Snowline Extent

[fjlip]

"Electroverse is not a recognized scientific organization, it is a climate change activist denial site."


For you EVERYBODY is!

Real good comments, describes the CULT/STUPIDITY very well... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uo9zZf_N-yg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uo9zZf_N-yg

[chuckChuck]

Thanks for attacking the messenger, now can you perhaps refute the science in the message?

Its not worth the bother because you don't believe in climate change science or scientists and it won't change your mind anyway.

If NASA, NOAA, the World Meterological Organization can't provide enough evidence and proof for you then nothing will.

Have fun defending your childrens author take on climate science!

[fjlip]

Look how HOT it's going to be... https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook

Refute Mickey Mouse...11,000 nobodies are SCIENTISTS... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be

After being found out they disabled signatures and viewing them. https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/

[furrowtickler]

Look how HOT it's going to be... https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook

Refute Mickey Mouse...11,000 nobodies are SCIENTISTS... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be

After being found out they disabled signatures and viewing them. https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/

The interview with Rex and this 11,000 fake scientist viewpoint is exactly why I hold great scepticism on the “climate emergency” nonsense.
Add to the the fake temperatures used in the study on Greenland and refusal to publish or even show the “corrected” temps later by msm solidifies how disturbing this whole scam is .
The truth is being exposed for what it really is , a UN sponsored wealth distribution tax , not off industry or elite but off the backs of the middle class workers. Canada needed to step away from the UN years ago , not dive headfirst into this quagmire.

[seldomseen]

Its not worth the bother because you don't believe in climate change science or scientists and it won't change your mind anyway.

If NASA, NOAA, the World Meterological Organization can't provide enough evidence and proof for you then nothing will.

Have fun defending your childrens author take on climate science!

So if its not worth the bother to try and change our minds then why are you always on here trying to change our minds?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Have fun defending your childrens author take on climate science!

I didn't defend him. I didn't even read it, I try to avoid exposing myself to any more confirmation bias. Instead, I keep reading what you post, trying to challenge my own biases. How about you? Have you ever risked reading or viewing something that challenges your religion? It would be much appreciated if you could make an effort to understand the science so you could formulate an informed and technical response to these links, so we could have an intellectual discussion about the underlying science and evidence. Instead of this predictable attack the source rhetoric. And then wonder why most of us won't waste the time trying to help you understand.

Is a children's author any less qualified than an actor, a 16 year old uneducated child, or a socialist disenfranchised former CWB director?

[jazz]

Its not worth the bother because you don't believe in climate change science or scientists and it won't change your mind anyway.

I made a claim with evidence just like you have with climate change. My claim refutes yours, so now show us the peer reviewed published paper that says land based snowpack extent is actually falling and not increasing and destroy my argument, if you can.

[tweety]

I made a claim with evidence just like you have with climate change. My claim refutes yours, so now show us the peer reviewed published paper that says land based snowpack extent is actually falling and not increasing and destroy my argument, if you can.

Um......

[jazz]

[QUOTE=tweety;432087]Um......

That's great, so no annual changes, spring and fall balance out and snow pack is exactly the same year over year. Nice research.

And there is still no climate change.

[Taiga]

[QUOTE=jazz;432088]

Um......

That's great, so no annual changes, spring and fall balance out and snow pack is exactly the same year over year. Nice research.

And there is still no climate change.

I guess we can conclude fall comes earlier every year, and spring comes earlier too. We need more leap years in a row to get the earth back on schedule!